Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - nate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17
41
Studying and Exam Taking / Re: Grades????
« on: January 20, 2006, 08:29:30 PM »
3.2 just seems ridiculously high. i'm at 3.0 right now (praying it will only go up), and according to the handbook that's a "with honors" gpa. so basically, about 60% of the class is in "with honors" standing. crazy.

42
Studying and Exam Taking / Re: Grades????
« on: January 20, 2006, 07:16:20 PM »
TDurden-

what's GW's median?

congrats, btw!

43
BTW I just got all my grades but one:

C (2 credit)
B- (3 credit)
B- (3 credit)
B (3 credit)

for an average so far of 2.64. My missing class is a 4 credit class. My school uses a 2.8 curve. I'm pretty darn upset about it right now but I'll be over it by tomorrow morning after I eat some greasy pizza and chocolate bars! LOL.

But seriously, is a 2.64 on a 2.8 curve really awful? I'm being told it's about right.

no that's not awful at all. that puts you somewhere around the median. of course "median" means different things at different schools in terms of employment etc., but i don't see why being in the middle of the class is bad at all. congrats.

44
Transferring / Re: Questions for People Who Have Transferred.
« on: January 20, 2006, 03:46:55 PM »
nate,

I don't see how I couldn't at least consider transfering. I couldn't happier with my professors, the administration, etc.  On the other hand, my wife is attending graduate school too; her program is unranked and doesn't even offer her desired concentration.  Unlike me, she got into top 10 schools, so I have felt guilty for subjecting her to a sub-par acedemic experience.

I will have to weigh all the options and make the final decision after next semester.

well you definitely should consider transferring. i understand the situation you're in with your girlfriend is difficult. my own girlfriend will be in a semi-similar situation next year. do you happen to know if it's possible for grad students to transfer?

but i was just going to say, there are "early action" opportunities that you can take advantage of having only this semester's grades.

45
Transferring / Re: Questions for People Who Have Transferred.
« on: January 20, 2006, 03:08:12 PM »
snough,

are you considering transferring?

46
General Board / Re: The truth so quit whining
« on: January 19, 2006, 11:38:32 PM »
don't be apologetic. that was a good "rant", if you could even call it that. you make good points.

47
General Board / Re: Anon LS Dean here taking questions...
« on: January 19, 2006, 11:34:11 PM »
i guess what i want to know is, why do schools continue to place such a strong emphasis on socratic method? why don't schools get more creative and pressure their professors to give their students periodic tests throughout the semester, or write papers for grades during 1L classes?


That is the way it has always been and always will be.  Remember, this method teaches one to think.

You answered your own question as far as the "lowered-tier" comment.

I am old and "suredly" was what I grew up with.


I'm going to have to disagree. Granted I'm only a 1L, but I've already noticed a HUGE difference between last semester and this one. Last semester we were called on radomly- were expected to know all of the facts, the legal rule, all of the legal reasoning, the holding, etc, on the spot. It put so much pressure on us that we almost couldn't learn.

This semester, however, most professors have switched over to calling on people in alphabetical order. Obviously, it's more relaxed. However, those who are truly concerned with learning are able to read cases in order to learn, rather than read cases in order to get called on. Now our conversations in regards to the law, in my experience anyways, are much more lively and engaging before and after class. We're actually dedicated to what we learn, rather than being nervous about being put on the spot.

The socratic method is the way it's been, not always, but for a long while. And yes, being put on the spot teaches one to think, in some regards. But being put in a positive and cooperative environment also teaches one to think; often in a more efficient manner. In fact, I'd be willing to say that most people in my school would say that the Socratic method is more of a hinderance to learning than other alternative methods. What that's worth, I honestly don't know.

Is there no possible compromise or balance among such competing views? Must it always be purely socratic?

48
General Board / Re: Anon LS Dean here taking questions...
« on: January 19, 2006, 09:56:05 PM »
many have criticized the "elitist institution" of legal academia. they have claimed that professors continue the (arguably) inefficient and negative teaching-model that is the socratic method, purely because it's how they succeeded in law school, and thus feel all that are going to succeed should do so through the same system that they do.

i am sympathetic to this argument, though i will admit, if it doesn't change i can deal with that just fine too.

i guess what i want to know is, why do schools continue to place such a strong emphasis on socratic method? why don't schools get more creative and pressure their professors to give their students periodic tests throughout the semester, or write papers for grades during 1L classes?

from what you say about people "joking" about your school, i'm assuming it's a lower-tier school, so that raises another question. why don't lower tiered schools get more creative with this stuff? is it an over-arching desire to be as much like the higher ranked schoools, as possible?

49
the school might not find out, but the bar association will. i hear they've got quite the background-check/research abilities. whether it's true or not, i don't know, but i wouldn't  be messing around. why go through law school just to find out that you can't become a certified lawyer?

50
General Board / Re: do lawyers get secretaries...
« on: January 19, 2006, 02:07:01 AM »
Yes this is pretty routine for big law firms.  Especially if you've made it past the grunt work and training of a new hire.

so not right when you start, then?

and any idea about "midlaw"?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 17