Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - nate

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17
Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 10, 2005, 12:07:57 AM »
As of now I'm interested in land use law but I know this might change as I take courses. I have worked with the Virginia Wind Energy Collaborative (VWEC) on designing land use laws for wind towers in the area. I've noticed that GW LS has assisted the VWEC on their website. I wrote my PS on that project. Any chance my unusual work experience helps?

i'm absolutely sure it will. it will help you stand out from all the patent examiners in the evening division (the only group possibly more populous than the international law hopefuls), let alone all the 1Ls like me that don't work and just finished undergrad.

and that actually brings up a good point. i'm almost certain that those who make it clear they're going to work while attending school have an edge over those who are just using PT to transfer to FT. while GW doesn't hesitate to admit that PT is often just a backdoor to FT, i also think they want to maintain a decent size group of people that actually do complete the program while working, if not just to convince themselves that there's a good reason to keep the PT program (which are said to affect rankings). that probably gives any person with a steady job, such as yourself, an edge over the unemployed college graduate like myself looking for an easy way in to the T20.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 09, 2005, 11:43:56 PM »
Thank you nate for your insight. I am applying to GW PT but plan to keep my current job in the region until I can transfer. What suggestions do you have for those that plan to work while doing PT. In addition, I have similar stats as yourself which I recognize as being on the lower end. Could you explain any soft factors that might have helped yourself (and might help me). Once again that was one of the most helpful posts I've seen here.

did you edit this post? if not, i apologize for skipping the last part. yes, my stats were on the lower end. i wish i could say what soft factors helped, but as i said before, i was waitlisted at some lower tier ones. so i honestly don't know if i have a good answer.

i was diagnosed with diabetes during my sophmore year of college. i was diagnosed at the end of fall semester and was getting treatment in to the beginning of spring semester. i included a fairly detailed addendum demonstrating that if i hadn't missed so much school, and performed as i did the other years, i would have had more like a 3.8. i really think that helped for GW (where the other schools didn't seem to care). other than that i'm not a very interesting person, honestly. i did an honors thesis with a history professor who then wrote me a great recommendation, and i also was a founder and editor-in-chief of an academic journal within my undergrad history department. other than that, there is absolutely nothing special on my resume.

there is one thing that i do know...half the 1Ls at GW want to "practice international law". i'm not trying to say you can't do so; people just often don't know what it is when they think they want to do it. if that's your plan, try and avoid filling your personal statement with information about it, unless you have something very specific within that area of law that you do want to be involved in. i can only imagine that they get a ton of those types of personal statements. i wrote my thesis on european immigration, which is technically part international law, but i had some ideas of what i wanted to do with it, and referenced GW's specific clinics and even a professor. i think specificity might help because for PT they want to see if you're a good fit for the school. but again, i don't know if that helped or hurt me, so don't take it to heart.

but the nice thing about applying to GW PT is that you know they're actually looking at your soft factors. unlike FT, they can afford to take people they really want. unfortunately for some, that means they can afford to skip out on others that they don't really want.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 09, 2005, 11:29:46 PM »
Thank you nate for your insight. I am applying to GW PT but plan to keep my current job in the region until I can transfer. What suggestions do you have for those that plan to work while doing PT. In addition, I have similar stats as yourself which I recognize as being on the lower end. Could you explain any soft factors that might have helped yourself (and might help me). Once again that was one of the most helpful posts I've seen here.

Only to be sure that you are truly willing to do it for four years. I started seeing a "tired beyond belief" look in some of the people's eyes 3 weeks in to the semester. As I said before, many people have decided to quit their jobs and focus on law school part time. So I guess my advice as far as that goes is, if you have the stats to go FT at GW, do not enter the PT program lightly. I think a few of my fellow students who quit their jobs, and who also could have gone FT to begin with, are kicking themselves for not having quit work before law school started.

This all seems pretty obvious, but you really have to be ready to do some serious work at GW PT. I have friends working and going PT to tier 2 and 3 schools, and it sounds like it's pretty laid back and not extremely difficult. GW, however, if full of gunners. Fortunately the PT students tend to be more friendly and less back-stabbing competitive than the FT students (from what I'm told from 2Ls that have switched), but the type of competition you will be up against is no joke for someone also working 40 hours/week. I guess this point just adds to the "be sure you want to work and go PT" point.

if you have any other specifics, please ask.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 09, 2005, 11:16:07 PM »
I don't think I would.  But I'm not really concerned with being at a T14 school.  I mean, if I were unhappy, then I would, of course.

Matter of personal preference I suppose. 

well, to each their own. i'm interested in biglaw, though only for a few years. after taking one of my exams, i now wish i was at GULC because i could afford to rank lower in the class and still have a chance at a market-rate job. additionally, i might have to move across country, or even overseas, depending on where my girlfriend goes for her masters/PhD. the top 14 are the only truly "national" schools. i also have grad school plans of my own, and going to the most prestigious school is without a doubt a good choice if you ever want to teach law (though i do only hope to teach jointly, with a spot in an undergrad department, so it's not like GW will be a negative).

but yes, if you have no reasons to go to a T14, there is probably no reason to do so. the prestige whoring for no real reason gets pretty old, though be forewarned that it does continue even in to law school.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 09, 2005, 10:51:14 PM »
Do you know if GULC is similar to this for PT?

in most ways, i would say it is, at least from what i understand. the main difference is that you can't switch until the end of 1L, so the grades you receive might have something to do with being able to transfer (but i doubt it).

but just as i said i would choose GW PT over a lower tier one FT, i would choose GULC PT over even a top 25 FT. looking back on it now i really wish i had applied there.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: GW PT
« on: December 09, 2005, 10:06:20 PM »
i'm a 1L PT student at GW this year, transferring to FT next semester. there's some comments i want to make about the situation, and i can try and offer some advice, or answer any questions people have.

you can transfer after the first semester no matter what. the school told us at orientation that the bulletin says they "reserve the right" to forbid someone from transferring from one to the other, but they have not yet ever actually done so. additionally, seeing as how grades don't come out until part way through the 2nd semester, even if you were to fail a class (which is almost impossible, and if so, you should probably seriously reconsider the whole law school thing), you'd be in full time before they could do anything about it.

what i wasn't made aware of until orientation, is that while you do gain full time status your second semester, unfotunately you still have to take classes with the part timers. that means spring semester 1L you're taking all your classes with the evening students, with an additional class during the day to make you "full time". that leaves 2 classes of the required "core" to take. a lot of people take one of them over the summer (and do an unpaid internship in the area) and then the other one in the following fall. others do an externship for credits, or study abroad, and then take both of the classes the following fall. either way, because of GW's residence requirement, in order to graduate within 3 years you have to take some kind of credits over the summer (which you probably should anyways).

this is really a popular option. of the 120 or so people in the PT division, i think about 50, maybe even around 60. many came in with the plan to transfer, while others have quit their jobs since and plan to go FT. really, being able to start FT in spring semester is a great option, and not a bad way to ease yourself in to law school.

there is probably a legitimate worry about going this route not being as prestigious as getting in FT. unfortunately, like it or not, there are probably some employers who are going to actually care about this, despite the school's strict policy of telling us that having started PT won't matter at all, that no one cares, and that no firm has the time or energy to see why you didn't take property your first semester. i think it's bull. however, i think in the end the difference is more subtle, and probably doesn't end up affecting most people. if you want a market-rate job, GW is a place where you really have to finish in the top 1/2. having gone PT is not going to give someone who ranks in the bottom third of the class more options than you if you rank in the top third, or any such nonsense like that. when you're in the school, employers are going to care about where you finished overall. the only time i can imagine it would matter is if they were choosing between you and someone with the same grades who happened to start FT. even then though, from all the 3L's i've talked to who switched themselves, this really doesn't seem to be the case.

i see no reason to go to a lower ranked school unless it's somewhere around the top 25. again, there might be some stigma involved with going PT to FT. however, in the end, you're still at a school where the top third (perhaps even 40-50%, some tell me) can get market-rate firm jobs. i would see no reason to go a lower tier one that doesn't offer the same opportunities. i had a 3.5/161, only sent out a few apps, and got waitlisted at wisconsin and indiana-bloomington. i don't know if i did something wrong (i'll never know, really), but that left my choices between GW PT and Loyola Chicago FT, so the choice seemed clear. i guess the only person who i would say choosing to go to GW PT might be a tough choice is for someone who gets in to somewhere like BC or fordham FT. in that case i would say go there. i have one friend at GW who got in to boston u FT, and for some reason went to GW PT...that makes no sense.

you also have to realize that there are some other potential problems with starting out PT. one major problem is that you don't really get to meet the FT 1L's. you'll have no problem meeting other PT'ers who are transferring, so it hasn't been an issue for me. however, it is a little weird to walk around the school during social events and not really know anyone. i met some FT 1L's at the beginning of the year, but haven't talked to most of them since. it just seems to work out that way unless you happen to know some people in the FT division from before school starts. another problem is student activities- a lot of them meet around 5 or 6, right when evening classes start, so you can't get involved in much your first year (you can probably pay to join, but that's about it).

and if you are considering this option, be warned- do not fool yourself in to thinking that it's a secret way of starting law school in which you can do absolutely fabulous becuase you have all day to study 2 subjects. everyone thinks this is how it's going to be and it never is. even when people are told it won't work out that way, they always think it's going to be different for them. but there's a very good chance it won't. i don't know what it is, but i think it's that there's really only so much you can do when it comes to studying. reading the assigned reading over and over all day is not going to help you understand the material any better, and when the semester comes to an end you'll be in basically the same spot as the PT'ers who work during the day. the only way i see around this is to get a study group together within the first couple weeks of school, get together a few hours at the end of every week (unlike FT 1Ls, you have no class on friday), and just discuss everything you learned during the week.

lastly, having nothing to do until 6 is a schedule that is pretty hard to get used to. i think it has really gotten to a lot of my fellow students. take this in to serious consideration if you choose this option.

wow. i didn't plan to write so much, but that's what i wanted to let everyone know about the matter. any questions, don't hesitate to ask.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: gulc vs gw
« on: October 23, 2005, 02:35:51 AM »
Well thank you, Nate.  I try my best. 

my pleasure.

so you're a GW 1L who is also from michigan?

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: gulc vs gw
« on: October 22, 2005, 08:49:40 PM »
Is it possible to transfer from GW PT to a T14 FT?  If so, I would imagine that you'd have to place even better than top 20%, since the PT class isn't as numerically competitive (LSAT, GPA), right?

T14 schools and their stance on letting PT students in as transfers...



yale (though pretty convinced it's a no)

as far as being PT at GW, these schools generally claim that PT students must rank at the same spot as FT students. though, they will all advise you that there is no guarantee of admission at any ranking, and that having taken less credits might put a student at a disadvantage against someone who has..

personally, i would fail to see why you would need to rank higher in PT than those in FT who transfer. while it's true that the admissions requirements are lower than those for FT, they're also higher than many other tier 1 schools. if T14's take students from the top 15% or so from any tier 1, why not GW PT?

saxby, by the way, makes an excellent point about the PT students and the rankings in general.

Reviews, Visits, and Rankings / Re: gulc vs gw
« on: October 22, 2005, 06:12:50 PM »
If you want a T14 job, I could see that.  Otherwise I just don't.  I wouldn't leave somewhere I was happy to go somewhere I was only interested in because of a ranking a news magazine assigned.  If an employer actually thinks I'm not as good becuase my school was number 20 instead of number 14, I'm not interested in that employer. 

I would have to really investigate how I felt about the school I was already at and how I might feel at the new school in question in order to make a decision. 

well, i do want a T14 job, at least to begin with. and if i was sitting at the edge of the top third- where i probably wasn't making LR- and had the ability to transfer to a T14 where job prospects are better, then i'd go for it. in terms of those jobs, top third at GW is cutting it pretty close from what i understand. i also have future graduate school plans and would like to teach at a 3rd tier (maybe 2nd tier ) law school if possible. for that i see GULC as opening up many more doors, even though GULC itself certainly doesn't guarantee anything for legal academia.

i really do like GW. and if i'm so in love with the place at the end of this year that i don't want to leave, i won't. but if i'm still indifferent about transferring to a "national" school in the same town that has as many, if not more opportunities, it doesn't seem like a bad option to me. it's only 2 more years of school, but might mean a lot more for years after that.

Where should I go next fall? / Re: part time vs. full time
« on: October 22, 2005, 02:08:38 PM »
PT programs are usually always easier. in fact, many schools suggest PT to those they waitlist.

generally, you have to wait a year to transfer to FT. at other places (GW is one) you can transfer after the first semester. i don't think any school would let you switch immediately after you are admitted. any way though, you have to make up some credits during the summer after your first year, and you'll end up graduating in 3 years.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17