Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - vsavatar

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13
81
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post your score estimate
« on: February 04, 2006, 06:46:34 PM »
155-156 is likely, 158 if I'm lucky.

82
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post-Mortem Feb. 06 ----> Logic Games
« on: February 04, 2006, 06:35:26 PM »
The second I saw birds in game two i got pissed and thought of jays, shrikes and wrens...........

 >:(

LOL, Someone on this board actually said a couple days ago that's the one thing they did NOT want to see on the LSAT was jays, shrikes, and wrens.  As soon as I saw that game, I thought of that post.

83
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem - Feb 06 Reading Comp
« on: February 04, 2006, 06:00:35 PM »
But he also said the practice was draconian.  He was talking about the populace's response when he said "unpopular", but he wouldn't have used the word draconian if he didn't think it was an appropriate word.

84
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Writing Sample
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:56:21 PM »
I chose peer reviewed journal.

85
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:42:17 PM »
That was on there, but it might have been in the experimental section.

86
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:39:51 PM »
Yes, but if it wasn't about his medical condition, then it might not have been Tyler that leaked it.  What if it was his financial information.  It could have been his accountant that leaked it.

87
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:36:46 PM »
I thought the one about the mayor was the answer "The confidential information was not regarding the mayor's medical condition"

88
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem - Feb 06 Reading Comp
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:34:30 PM »
I think it really would have been funny if there had been a groupthink question like this:

The author of this passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements:
A) Group cohesiveness is the primary determining factor of GroupThink
B) People who engage in groupthink are more likely to develop well-reasoned, and moderate solutions.
C) People discussing the LSAT after the test will be more likely to engage in GroupThink than people who do not.
D) The factors contributing to GroupThink will never completely be known.
E) A non-cohesive group is more likely to experience GroupThink than a cohesive one.

89
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Experimental?
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:20:06 PM »
Well, considering I had to make wild guesses on the last to LR questions in section 3, I guess I don't feel too bad now.  Too bad section 2 couldn't have been experimental.  I still cannot believe I farked that one up so badly.

90
Studying for the LSAT / Re: FEB lsat difficulty discussion
« on: February 04, 2006, 05:17:20 PM »
A 161-163 in June, but that was on a 99 question test.  This is a 100-101 question test, depending on which LR sections were experimental and which were not.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13