Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Question

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 19
11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 05:12:31 PM »
what about the fossil/isotope question, i went with "isotopes unreliable in fossils" so can't compare to present-day mammals

for the other question about dinosaurs, went with "different climatic regions"

12
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 05:08:19 PM »
i went with dogs running, but i now wonder about the cows answer... did the cows have an element of dying anyway that would parallel the ill aspect of the heart disease people... because the dogs lacked that element

13
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 05:04:01 PM »
yeah, that was the 30% dangerous driving thing... i went with "random sampling didn't account for peak hours".

14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 04:54:59 PM »
blue cars = "other people driving their blue car"?

I had that one but I changed it to something else. Damn.

don't know, you might be right...  Does other people driving the cars have any bearing?  Had it down to two

15
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 04:46:55 PM »
blue cars = "other people driving their blue car"?

16
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List LRs you remeber
« on: February 12, 2005, 04:35:18 PM »
Blue cars, accidents
Bones with isotopes, fossils
3rd-Party student helpers not actually helping
Computers not likely to replace TVs

17
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2003 Answer Key
« on: February 11, 2005, 05:48:43 PM »
Found it on page 2

Thanks

18
Studying for the LSAT / June 2003 Answer Key
« on: February 11, 2005, 05:39:46 PM »
Anyone have it?

Thanks,

19
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 2 LR Questions
« on: February 06, 2005, 02:32:50 PM »
Thanks...  That's exactly what I needed to hear.  A concrete reason not to diagram that "Of course" sentence.  Seems to me like it could be diagrammed as a conditional statement with the variables ordered in the order in which they appear in the stimulus, but I guess we can't be sure.


20
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 2 LR Questions
« on: February 06, 2005, 02:17:05 PM »
Thanks, so I should not be diagramming the sentence beginning with "Of course...".  How do you know to not diagram it?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 19