Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - V

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 68
51
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Proctors shorting us
« on: June 06, 2005, 10:43:14 PM »
something similar happened to me in October, but the proctor realized their mistake and tried to compensate at the end.   I didn't report anything to LSAC, I figured it would be an exercise in futility. 
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,10209.msg150333.html#msg150333


Okay so she realized it but would switching timers compensate the loss of time>?  I mean were talking like almost 3 minutes here and that could be few extra points, assuming of course the time was used wisely and precisely.

52
YOU KNOW WHAT IS bull, THE FACT THAT THE POWER WENT OUT DURING THE LAST SECTION.  DID ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER PROBLEMS? 

PS: I WAS AT GMU IN VIRGINIA.


I'm really sorry to hear about this and my petty issue doesn't hold weight next to yours.  Write and call and go from there.  Good luck!

53
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Proctors shorting us
« on: June 06, 2005, 10:29:30 PM »
I used a "Silent Timer," and the proctors (surprisingly) were accurate to within 10 seconds on each section.

I had my 'silent timer' too and it doesn't do squat apparently.  I sincerely mean no disrespect, just stating what happened. 

54
Don't know. But you may get be a note in your permanent record indicating that you were "robbed".

Thanks a lot Sancho.  You know it's funny b.c. I didn't pay attention too that due to other things in front of me, but really glad people made a fuss b.c. I kept saying if I only had another minute, and gee...   :o

55
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Proctors shorting us
« on: June 06, 2005, 10:20:17 PM »
No question, report it. Could only help.

That really sucks. 40-45 is pretty significant. Too bad their crappy timer didn't add the time on instead.


Tell me about it.  So how can it help though?

56
And that's my q.  Not to sound selfish, but it's great and all that it will  help the next herd, but what about us who decide to keep?

57
Like 40- 43 seconds, which is almost a minute.  WTF.. you know, and in retrospect b.c. of my nerves, I just thought that I had started the timer too late, but now that I'm seriously thinking about it, it's just wrong, you know.  So what do you think?

You should report to LSAC.


I plan to tomorrow.  But seriously, like what does reporting do for me now, esp. if I end up keeping my score.  It'll help the next slew of kids but what about us?

58
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Proctors shorting us
« on: June 06, 2005, 10:15:30 PM »
Okay that's what I think too.  Thanks a lot!

59
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Proctors shorting us
« on: June 06, 2005, 10:13:04 PM »
Like 40- 43 seconds, which is almost a minute.  WTF.. you know, and in retrospect b.c. of my nerves, I just thought that I had started the timer too late, but now that I'm seriously thinking about it, it's just wrong, you know.  So what do you think?

60
RC was ball busting, undoubtedly.  I couldn't get a feel for things until I got to my 3rd passage.  So... sucks to be me.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 68