|
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - SoCal123
1
« on: May 01, 2009, 04:48:08 PM »
4
« on: February 03, 2009, 05:06:00 PM »
I was just pointing out that we do, in fact, know the method to the madness. If not a flame, I'm thinking high school sophomore.
OK, now THAT was a flame for sure.
No guessing there. 
I was just saying dude seems to lack some basic research/reading/reasoning skills.
Certainly, to define something as basic is to define it as "base", simple, rudimentary...or average. Meaning those who would study it would be average. The rankings and their madness are hardly fodder for the faint of heart, which is to say "average" people. So, "lacking basic" reasoning and research skills?...no. Another assumption you make is that because one does not do something, it must be the case that he cannot. Heck, it's a jump to assume someone has not done something, let alone the rest.
Rankings are simple arbitrary madness, and I take them seriously or not so seriously depending on the day of the week. I do not get into every subtlety of the rankings, though I do understand quite a bit. As for my reasoning? 51/51 on the LSAT and perfect (A+) grades in undergraduate philosophy, near perfect grades on all essays, including term papers (never below an A). Those are "reasons" to think otherwise.
But, honestly, we've gone way to far on this topic. I don't even think we are so much disagreeing as over-analyzing. It's killing my buzz.
Go Lawdog, way to go Goodwill Hunting on Ninja!
I wish I could do the same but my academic career would not have the same sting, sadly... 
Was Goodwill Hunting unable to read?
I said Goodwill Hunting, not Rainman. Slow on the driveway Ninja, slow on the driveway...
5
« on: February 03, 2009, 12:26:03 PM »
I was just pointing out that we do, in fact, know the method to the madness. If not a flame, I'm thinking high school sophomore.
OK, now THAT was a flame for sure.
No guessing there. 
I was just saying dude seems to lack some basic research/reading/reasoning skills.
Certainly, to define something as basic is to define it as "base", simple, rudimentary...or average. Meaning those who would study it would be average. The rankings and their madness are hardly fodder for the faint of heart, which is to say "average" people. So, "lacking basic" reasoning and research skills?...no. Another assumption you make is that because one does not do something, it must be the case that he cannot. Heck, it's a jump to assume someone has not done something, let alone the rest.
Rankings are simple arbitrary madness, and I take them seriously or not so seriously depending on the day of the week. I do not get into every subtlety of the rankings, though I do understand quite a bit. As for my reasoning? 51/51 on the LSAT and perfect (A+) grades in undergraduate philosophy, near perfect grades on all essays, including term papers (never below an A). Those are "reasons" to think otherwise.
But, honestly, we've gone way to far on this topic. I don't even think we are so much disagreeing as over-analyzing. It's killing my buzz.
Go Lawdog, way to go Goodwill Hunting on Ninja! I wish I could do the same but my academic career would not have the same sting, sadly...
6
« on: January 29, 2009, 11:58:13 AM »
I was just pointing out that we do, in fact, know the method to the madness. If not a flame, I'm thinking high school sophomore.
OK, now THAT was a flame for sure. No guessing there.
7
« on: January 19, 2009, 01:01:52 PM »
Of course, Chapman has the 3rd lowest ranking in the country according to this ranking (based on success of alumni).
http://www.avvo.com/stats/school_overview
Does anyone know how AVVO comes up with their rankings?
8
« on: January 06, 2009, 04:41:22 PM »
9
« on: November 29, 2008, 11:55:28 PM »
What are your thoughts on Irvine's new law school?
How does it compare to Pepperdine, Loyola, Chapman, and San Diego if you had to choose between these and Irvine?
10
« on: November 29, 2008, 11:47:53 PM »
 "Isn't Chapman that "Dog the Bounty Hunter" guy?" is actually winning this poll. WTF
|