« on: March 14, 2008, 03:14:43 PM »
I'm still waiting to be rejected to a few schools that are dragging their feet. My LSAT was okay and my grades were horribily affected by retakes. (I had a few Fs that I replaced with As)
How important is it for an admissions committee to improve the ranking of their school?
Consider this hypothetical decision: (neither candidate is me, btw)
(The following has been edited due to many people thinking the original scenario was ridiculous)
(All responses up to 3/17/08 were based on a 3.0 vs 3.7)
Candidate 1: 3.5 GPA 159 LSAT, Public University, Business, no work experience, no awards or extra-curricular, average personal statement.
Candidate 2: 3.3 UGPA 159 LSAt, Public University, Business, 4 Years of full-time relevant professional experience, many awards, leadership experience, fantastic personal statement.
Lets assume the Law School has a 25 Percentile GPA of 3.4, and that 159 is the median. Lets also assume the admissions committe thinks that #2 would make a better student and lawyer. Would they still be extremely hesitant to admit a student like that and Likely give candidate 1 the spot to improve their numbers?