« on: August 25, 2004, 10:25:24 PM »
Ok, it's not a big deal, but look at how he said it. "Public good"? Hmm... I paid 50 bucks to be part of this "public" that would benefit from the Logic Games Bible. Very well-written book, though.
Thanks for your message and your kind comments. I have reviewed the
issue you referenced on page 148, and you are correct: the two diagrams
should be reversed. I will have that correction posted today. Thank you
very much for pointing that out to me.
Regarding personal acknowledgement for submitted corrections, we have
decided not to follow that path. Please let me explain why. We look at
LSAT preparation as an education endeavor, not a competition to point
out mistakes and then get credit for them. We hope that in the spirit of
the public good that individuals will point out errors to us for
posting. If not, we expect that they will be found anyway as the book is
used by our students and teachers.
With your question on strengthening arguments, I am not sure which page
you are referring to. If you could tell me exactly what page you are
referencing, then I would be happy to provide you with more context for
Director, Course Development