I am curious when most SA Offices in big cities make their hiring decisions.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - mcleod13
That is what I thought too. I thought I would atleast try to look into it a little. She seemed pretty sure of it and has been a good source of information before. However, I had never heard of it nor has anyone else..
O.k. I am a little confused. I go to school in Illinois and have received an offer of an interview at the Miami SAO. I would really like to get this job, however, since I have a family and these things bills my travel fun is a little depleted. Anyway, I knew they wouldn't reimburse for travel.
I was talking to a friend at school and she mentioned something about NALP reimbursing for travel if you interview with one of the employers listed on their site. Does anyone know if this is true? I looked at the website and, although I was tired, from what I could tell it was for private firms and it was for the firms to reimburse and not NALP.
Anyone have information?
Hello all, I haven't written on here in a loooooooooooooooong time but I am in need of some help. I have an interview monday and was just informed that I have to bring a writing sample with me. They just decided it was a good idea. I have absolutely NO idea of how to format a cover letter for a writing sample. My career services office did not help at all.
Can someone give me a rough idea..
That was my point exactly. We did not spend alot of time on it either there are only but a few ways to teach the same material. Of course there are going to be different methods, however, the law is the law. How one lawyer argues is dependent on that lawyers abilities and preferences. You have absolutley no idea of who teaches here. We have professors from Harvard, GW, GTown, and other top schools. Why is it that you claim that grads of top schools are trained better but yet you fail to think that these same grads can teach students at lower tiered schools. In fact we were told that it wouldn't be tested, but it was used as history. But the fact that you and I disagree is no reason to say I don't know what the hell I am talking about. It is a difference in opinion. You don't attend my school and I don't attend yours.
but come on, you don't think that the people who you work with/for matter at any point? Not who your professors are, not who your bosses are, not who your co-workers are?
I think it will matter to a point but only as to the experience factor. I worked for 5 Judges the past year. It was a paying job so I did A LOT of work for them. I would also talk to them personally. One was a grad from University of Illinois, another was a grad of University of Chicago, and one was from my school. I learned a great deal from all of them.
Like I said, going to a higher tiered school does not mean that a graduate has it made and that everyting will be handed to them on a silver platter. .
What honestly makes you think that as soon as you have a JD you can hold your own against anybody? The fact that you think what you learn in law school is the RAP kind of shows how inadequate your education is. How much preclusion did you learn? Choice of law? pre-emption?
I just saw that I didn't support what I meant. When I said that, I was referring to the fact that I will have a JD and upon bar passage will be able to practice law. Of course I won't have the experience necessary. But that wasn't my point, I was attempting to make a statement that it will be my personal ability and not my schooling that will make my career.