« on: December 11, 2007, 08:35:47 PM »
RC was hard, and there's good reason for people not mentioning specific questions... we don't want the LSAC police hunting us down. I know it sounds ridiculous, but it's not worth the risk. RC was hard IMHO because the questions that you might take for granted, such as main point, or structure required some extra thought. This in turn slows you down and gives you less time for other questions. Also, as a whole I thought that LR was average difficulty and games were somewhere between easy and average.
still standing by my -10 = 170 prediction
Agreed, I just think the "easy" questions were harder because I didn't understand the material as well as normal due to the convoluted-ness of the passages.
I'm thinking -10 to -12 for 170
-12 would be out of control. I think that might be a bit of wishful thinking on your part.
Probably, but games and RC will cancel each other out and I think the LR were both harder than Sept.