Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Changed Name

Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76
731
Recommendations / Re: Nervous! Are your LORs "received" yet?
« on: October 23, 2007, 07:01:29 PM »
Thanks CalGirl for the information, it's much appreciated. I'll be keeping a look out for you and the other Cal people on this board.

732
Recommendations / Re: Nervous! Are your LORs "received" yet?
« on: October 23, 2007, 04:05:02 PM »
Just one question... I can see both of my letters of recommendation under "Account Status"..does that mean they've been processed and everything is ready to go or does it mean they've just been received and still need to be processed?

And to CalGirl, you have some amazing numbers, congratulations, you'll get in somewhere great! Go bears!

733
Recommendations / Re: Nervous! Are your LORs "received" yet?
« on: October 23, 2007, 01:11:12 PM »
Oh, i just checked... One has been received!! haha.. I'm just freaking out b/c I've sent off all my apps and this is the last piece of the puzzle and I'm a borderline candidate.. i'm trying to get any advantage i can

734
Recommendations / Re: Nervous! Are your LORs "received" yet?
« on: October 23, 2007, 01:07:50 PM »
I'm kind of in the same boat. Both of mine were sent in last week via regular US mail. Did anyone else send them in by regular mail? If so, how long did it take to get there??

Oh and CalGirl... did you go to berkeley??

How do you know if they have been received? Do they email you?

736
How many wrong to get a 170?

737
Has anybody figured out the logic behind how they release the scores? Last name? Geographic location? I would guess geographic location. Anyone from California receive their scores yet?

738
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Score release rumors/information
« on: October 19, 2007, 04:11:06 PM »
so what's the deal? Are we still thinking that it'll come today? Or is it too late for it now? .. damn, this is just like June. Get your hopes up and then shafted!

739
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Confusing TCR
« on: October 19, 2007, 03:07:50 PM »
D) attempts to support its conclusion by an appeal to the emotion of fear, which is often experienced by people faced with the prospect of losing their jobs to robots

haha.. and who says the LSAT doesn't like to add bits of humor?

740
I'll help with the second one also, since i don't want to leave.. haha..

Here it is conditionally:

If you support tax plan, then you have no chance of being elected.

If you know economics, you will NOT support the plan.

Therefore, If you have a chance to be elected, then you have to understand economics.

This is flaw question, and I think the flaw come primarily from the second premise:

If you know economics, you will NOT support the plan.

Knowing econ. is the sufficient condition. If you know econ. you will DEFINITELY NOT support the plan.

but you can still not support the plan and not know economics.
Just because you do not support the plan, we can't assume you know economics (we don't really know anything. Hell, i could not support the plan, but i don't know anything about Econ.)

I think this will become more obvious as you do more and more questions involving necc. and sufficiency.


Pages: 1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76