Considering manna was a food, it doesn't even make sense.
Messages - mentor
« on: October 25, 2007, 03:45:17 AM »
Well, my SAT math score correlates perfectly using the method with my LSAT score, so everybody else's should too.
You're confused. The word is actually 'reguiring' - no second 'e' - and doesn't exist as a noun.
« on: October 24, 2007, 07:15:47 PM »
Sure it could. The ability to follow a mathematical process and the ability to follow a logical process, which is what LR boils down to, could be very related. That doesn't mean that V doesn't correlate, just that M does.
« on: October 24, 2007, 04:12:54 AM »
The longer a pretzel stays in contact with teeth, the higher likelihood of cavity.
The longer a caramel stays in contact with teeth, the higher likelihood of cavity.
The correlation thus holds within each category (pretzels, caramels).
We have no evidence to compare whether any duration of caramel-teeth contact has a higher or lower likelihood of cavity than any duration of pretzel-teeth contact.
The correlation does not hold across the two categories.
« on: October 24, 2007, 04:08:12 AM »
You're confused on the meaning/reguirements of general correlation.
As long as I'm busting your balls, 'reguirements' isn't a word.
« on: October 24, 2007, 04:05:59 AM »
1200 divided by 1/2 is 2400. But we know what you meant.
I heard it was just the math section that correlated.
« on: October 23, 2007, 05:43:52 PM »
But it's not all HS students... SAT takers may be a larger subset, but they're also self-selecting.