Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Freak

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 490
1
The $70k difference is considerable. However, the real issue is what prospects you will have in practicing law in the field you desire with those schools. If you have a line on work, then going to the less expensive school is probably a better idea. It would also be a very good idea to see where your potential employer would prefer you attend. The secondary issue, which you can resolve quickly, is how much money does a starting lawyer earn, in the field you wish to practice.


2
How did they "run him through the ringer"?


In my state, those with DUI, etc. had to go to multiple meetings with Bar officials prior to sitting for the bar.  This is probably what Freak is referring to.

Yes, but the meetings occurred after passing the bar exam....

3
which states would you say are the most likely to take it? As for ten years, most of that would be spent in training if he went for the full LLM.

I'm an attorney in Illinois and I can tell you that fraud will probably result in the bar turning you down in Illinois. If it's more than 10 years old, then you have a chance. If not, you'll have to beg and plead for the bar to even think about accepting you.

I don't know, but I can tell you that a friend was admitted in IL with a Class A traffic offense (not even a DUI), but they ran him through the ringer and it was over 10 years old.

4
I'm an attorney in Illinois and I can tell you that fraud will probably result in the bar turning you down in Illinois. If it's more than 10 years old, then you have a chance. If not, you'll have to beg and plead for the bar to even think about accepting you.

5
This thread further confirms my decision to marry an Asian foreign woman. American women generally show too little respect to their husbands. In case people reading this don't know, men need respect in a relationship more than love. Women need love more than respect. Taking the man's name is a sign of respect. My fiancee shows respect to me in an incredible number of ways including insisting on cooking, cleaning and doing laundry - by hand - plus never complaining about my bad habits and instead praising me to others. Further, she offered to take my name despite the fact that only 4 people on the entire planet have her last name.

After considering this, I've decided that she should keep her name and simply add my name at the end. Yes, she might have a long name, but she's considering dropping her middle names (she has four names) so that she has only three names - 1st name (actually one of her middle names), her last name, and my name with no hyphens.  Our children will have 3 names - 1st name, her name, my name & no hyphens.

She showed me respect by offering to take my name when the topic arose and I showed love by proposing a compromise that satisfied both of us. I also traveled almost exactly half-way around the world (i.e. as far as one can go) and quit my job to be with her while we await a VISA.

Yes, it is so respectful of her to agree to be a maid, cook, nanny, and hooker for the price of one. Why can't you clean your own laundry by hand or with the washing machine? Can't you learn to cook? It isn't difficult.  Do you want a partner or a domestic slave? I am not saying that people don't play different roles in a partnership: maybe one works and the other does a lot of the domestic tasks or both work and share responsibilities- but you shouldn't expect it or feel disrespected if she doesn't want to do all of the things your mommy used to do for you. I resent, as a woman, your entire post. There are also a lot of men (not saying most by any means) that show disrespect for their wives  in far worse ways than in the way you implied women disrespect their husbands (I am guessing you meant disrespect by refusing to do housework or not take last names). Days of servitude in American marriages are over- you're correct. And perhaps (let me just guess here), your wife, living in her current country (which I only know is in Asia), finds you (and this is the truly sad part) to be her best option at a decent life because her country isn't as evolved as America. I guess that's why they have mail-order brides.

PS. A lot of women like to cook or do laundry and help their man; but it shouldn't be all the time (even if she is a homemaker because of children) and it shouldn't be expected. Yes, full-time employment is tough, but you gotta do your chores as mom says!

PPS. Wow, you're a really modern man to have decided for her about her last name.

You just called my fiancee a hooker! For your information, I showed her this and she's deeply offended by what you wrote. You are exactly what I'd expect from the typical American woman - selfish. Maybe that's why America has a 50% divorce rate or maybe it's "modern men". She on the other hand has an L.L.B. from the Univ. of London and is fluent in 4 languages with a passing knowledge of several more. We met in Chicago while she was here on another VISA. She's incredible and I love her more than words can express. She chose to be with me because of how I listen to her and treat her with love.

I'll have you know that I've worked since age 11 (I'm 31 now), paid for all my major expenses (housing, cars, education etc.), done my own laundry since 11 and my Mom rarely cooks except on special occasions (although she did due to money when we were young). She's the best Mom any man could want - she home schooled her 3 children until high school (part-time home school). Clearly better than your Mom who failed to teach you respect. Have you paid for all your cars (cash), insurance (cash), college (cash) and law school (loan paid off), and house ($50k loan remains) by yourself? Plus have enough money saved to take over a year off work and support 2 people with no money from anybody else? I highly doubt it. (paid-off Nov. 2010)

As for her doing everything, as I wrote - she insists! Although sometimes she'll relent and let me help. I've done those things for myself most of my life. She feels it's disrespectful for the man to do those things. And yes, she intends to be a homemaker. Our children will know two cultures, speak several languages, and have excellent education.

I won't reply to any further posts by you, but I couldn't let your vile spew of vomit go unwashed.

6
It is an immigration law issue and here's why:

I am waiting for my fiancee to receive a VISA and we began the process in Nov. 2009; we still have no VISA interview. Is Obama implying that I should smuggle her into the US and then wait for asylum i.e. a corrupt politician to pull some strings? In other words, should we break the law and hope for mercy like his aunt received? I mean after all should attorneys respect the law as officers of the court (I'm an attorney too)?

It would take much less time & money to smuggle her into the US and await asylum. Clearly it should be easier and less expensive to follow the law than to break it and have the law still on your side in the end. Obama's aunt should've been jailed while she waited 7 months for a 5 min. hearing to decide if she's to be put on a navy ship (on rotation to her country) - in the brig - and sent back to the country from which she came. I state 5 min. because that's all the time my financee will receive in the VISA interview. I don't even have the right to testify on her behalf in person - despite the fact that I'm a 4th generation US citizen and I moved to her country while we await the interview. Further, the interviewer has almost complete authority to decide if she receives a VISA. Of course, I will try to get into the interview.

The point is that getting caught breaking the law shouldn't result in a better result than if one never broke the law. As things stand, it makes sense to sneak into the US rather than immigrate legally - an immigration law issue.

7
It depends on the State, but regardless the LLB holder still must pass the BAR exam.

8
Minority Topics / Re: Asians-URM
« on: June 03, 2010, 01:54:54 AM »
I'm marrying an Asian with an LLB who speaks 4 languages fluently and I'm a US attorney. Incidentally I'm living in her country where whites are definitely a huge minority - so for now I'm a URM.

Anyway, they are URM and since they typically do very well in school, they should receive a huge affirmative action boost because they beat the pants off almost everybody (yes, my fiancee is very smart - although she continuously denies she's smarter than me). In other words, they don't need URM status because they are typically so academically proficient. Meritocracy suits them well - as it should everybody IMHO - but if people insist on AA, give it to them in huge doses.

9
This thread further confirms my decision to marry an Asian foreign woman. American women generally show too little respect to their husbands. In case people reading this don't know, men need respect in a relationship more than love. Women need love more than respect. Taking the man's name is a sign of respect. My fiancee shows respect to me in an incredible number of ways including insisting on cooking, cleaning and doing laundry - by hand - plus never complaining about my bad habits and instead praising me to others. Further, she offered to take my name despite the fact that only 4 people on the entire planet have her last name.

After considering this, I've decided that she should keep her name and simply add my name at the end. Yes, she might have a long name, but she's considering dropping her middle names (she has four names) so that she has only three names - 1st name (actually one of her middle names), her last name, and my name with no hyphens.  Our children will have 3 names - 1st name, her name, my name & no hyphens.

She showed me respect by offering to take my name when the topic arose and I showed love by proposing a compromise that satisfied both of us. I also traveled almost exactly half-way around the world (i.e. as far as one can go) and quit my job to be with her while we await a VISA.

10
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Criticism of the Common Law
« on: June 03, 2010, 12:14:13 AM »
I'm a third year attorney. I've argued dozens of motions, aribtration hearings, tried 3 cases and argued 1 appeal. I've also lived in a developing country where the government is horribly corrupt - I could cite examples. Mr. Stanford is a hack and his arguments have no merit (google him). The American common law system works very well - I've seen it's results first hand and they're just - 1000x better than I see in the country I now live.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 490