Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Migrate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11
51
Studying for the LSAT / Preptest #8 (Answer Typo?)
« on: May 26, 2008, 10:09:14 PM »
Does anyone know the answer to Preptest 8 Section 1 (Logical Reasoning Question #9?) I think it's a typo... Kaplan's explanation and the Nova explanations are kinda funny cuz the Kaplan one says D is correct and Nova says C is correct, while having their own explanations to it... does anyone have the LSAC key, or mind clarifying the answer?

52
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Preptest 39 Section 2 Question 10
« on: May 26, 2008, 10:07:06 PM »
Thanks for the response. But I still don't understand why that would be a good thing, if, as stated in the answer choice "france could not make reasonable decisions based on a consistent french line." If the answer choice just said, "Decision by refrendum would make the overall course of policy unpredictable", that makes perfect sense. But the latter part means that unpredictable decisions are GOOD, since other countries could NOT make reasonable decisions based on consistent french line..

53
Studying for the LSAT / Preptest 39 Section 2 Question 10
« on: May 22, 2008, 09:42:00 PM »
Can someone pleez help me with this?

Claude: [blah blah] France should hold referenda on major foreign-policy issues...[blah]
Lorraine: [blah] Therefore, the introduction of such referenda would lead to foreign-policy disaster.

10. Which one of hte following, if true, provide the most support for Lorrain's conclusion?
Answer is C) Decision by refrendum would make the overall course of policy unpredictable, and countries frinedly to France could not make reasonable decisoins based on a consistent french line.

I eliminated everyhting else, but I thought C was a weakener. Lorraine's conclusion is referenda would lead to froeign-policy disaster. C says referendum would make decisions upredictable..if friendly foreign countries could not make decisions based on CONSISTENT french line, wouldn't it be good that it makes decisions unpredictable (i.e. inconsistent)?


54
Law School Applications / Kaplan LSAT
« on: May 16, 2008, 04:49:13 PM »
Hey guys
do any of you have PDF files of Kaplan's LSAT explanations for recent tests? I would really appreciate it if anyone is willing to share. Thank you:)!

55
Studying for the LSAT / LSAT Explanations
« on: April 28, 2008, 07:33:40 PM »
Does anyone have kaplan explanation pdfs for testpreps from 2002 to recent? i would really appreciate it if anyone is willing to share. Thanks!

56
Does anybody have these two LSATs? Please email me!! I would be willing to trade in for LSAT explanations.

Thank you!!

57
Personal Statement / Re: Addendum Help: LSAT
« on: October 03, 2007, 04:20:21 PM »
i'll be willing to read over it~~~ i'll also be willing to share mine with ya~

58
it's at Yonsei right?
I'm thinking about taking it there in 2008...
good luck :)

59
Law School Applications / Re: LIST: Schools who have Optional Essay
« on: August 19, 2007, 11:39:09 PM »
great topic!
I also cannot find columbia's diversity statement.... is it in the actual application?
can someone post what they actually ask for?

60
Studying for the LSAT / Hand Scoring
« on: June 12, 2007, 07:14:33 PM »
I remember erasing two answers, and the erasing thing just didn't "feel" like they were erased... do you guys know if handscoring request needs to be made before they grade it?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11