This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - blackpowerman
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26  28 29 30
« on: May 23, 2007, 02:43:07 AM »
with all this jumble mumble bs about tier 4's being crap- wheres the truth?
if you are at at tier 4 and enjoy or have thrived or whatever let me know please!!
dispel the rumors our concede to the facts!!
« on: May 20, 2007, 12:33:39 AM »
that's a gigantic political issue there- and i dont know what you were trying to say exactly, but thanks for the info...
i won't judge a school on the basis of its alumnus' personal/political/religious endeavours.
i mean, oj simpson is a graduate of USC....i don't thing application numbers dropped any nor did the quality of the school.
anyways, id like to know about the quality of education please!
« on: May 19, 2007, 03:02:59 AM »
who knows what about st thomas florida law??? i have heard absolutely nothing about them!! what gives?
« on: May 17, 2007, 11:12:29 PM »
i have nothing against black people!! at all!! i dont understand why you say that- just because i dont like al sharpton does not mean i dont like black people. thats ridiculous.
also, what question did u ask me that i did not answer?
« on: May 17, 2007, 02:12:08 PM »
wow, you googled me eh? well well, im exposed now...whatcha gonna do? should i be expecting the feds at my door? and btw...the name on my birth certificate isnt the name i "go" by so its not my "real" name brother.
but let's say for argument, that it is my real name. what now? do i win a prize? lose the competition? get ousted off the island? voted off stage? get diagnosed with aids?
im nervously waiting miss p, let me know brother...im waiting.
and on the other topic
what would happen if fox, cnn, etc, would refuse to air al sharpton? first of all, they know hes a racist bigot and want him to prove this every time he is on air. second of all, he will just get on BET or something and say" oh, fox won't let me air me because they are racist. its ridiculous, he shouldnt have a voice in this country after all the *&^% he has done. remember him calling the former NYC mayor a "n-word whore" and greeks "homos"- wheres the justice for that?
« on: May 17, 2007, 05:25:35 AM »
im gonna assume ur saying i put my real name on my account? not so much...
anyways back to the argument
many "naturalized" BLACKS owned slaves in america. in fact, one black slave owner in particular was one of the largest slave owners in all of south carolina. a free black man, william ellison was a famous cotton gin maker and owned many many black slaves. the same ones lined up on the beaches of west africa readily sold by black tribal chiefs.
read more here...
In an 1856 letter to his wife Mary Custis Lee, Robert E. Lee called slavery "a moral and political evil." Yet he concluded that black slaves were immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially and physically.
The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
read the rest herehttp://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
« on: May 17, 2007, 04:12:53 AM »
i am curious if you were saying i was baiting you! you know i have nothing but love for you baby! anyways, its cool if you don't want to share, just curious u know, that's all.
« on: May 17, 2007, 04:11:03 AM »
CNN and FOX and everyone else HAVE to give al sharpton air time...or else they will be in the hot seat for "discrimination". take a look at the "new black panther" who are denounce by the original black panthers founder huey p newton.
kahlid abdul mohammed is a racist, outspoken racist by the way, yet he gets air time. when is the last time you saw the KKK getting air time? never. CNN and FOX are held by the short hairs, and lets say they DO want to air al and jesse and kahlib- its only because of ratings and they look good on the political front.
anyways, give that a shot
« on: May 16, 2007, 01:53:50 PM »
im late for work but fuq it..
ok, let see where do i begin.
first, i knew not every NAACP member was black, i threw that in there just for sake of argument. second, KKK is a hate group while NAACP is a political group. the KKK does not want anyone who isnt pure white anglo saxon to be in their group. the NAACP will take anyone who will join- white, black, jew. the naacp wants a diverse culture to stray away from their counterpart-the black panthers- who are a hate group. also, TITLE alone, national association for the advancement of colored people one can refer that....it represents colored people. i have yet to see the NAACP take an issue on a non colored person and back them up. if you have seen sucha thing, please let me know im curious.
now, about my africa rant. i didnt mean you would SURELY be suffereing, but i have done a bit of reading/research through college about the state of affairs in Africa and the majority of things aren't going so well. and before the evil white man went to africa and stole the slaves- wait a minute- it was africans who sold africans into slavery. nevermin then....
now just because you are black doesnt make you african. im speaking about true african descendents. please tell me that harriet tubman would want her struggles to be shot in vain with the political fires of al sharpton and jesse jackson. read the book "shakedown" if you care to learn anything about jesse jackson. as long as the "black man is down" and theres a "struggle in the hood", al sharpton and jesse jackson thrive. without this, htey are nothing and they know it. its sad that they represent the black community when much of the black community realize they are being hosed.
back to africa and their thriving economy. africa was thriving through- wait a second- slavery!!!!!
i stand behind my research that slavery was occuring well before the european imperialism took shape. europeans simply went to the african market and bought what was willingly sold- sure, its wrong, but in those times, thats the way it was. please dont portray africa as being an innocent victim of euro pillaging. it wasnt like they invaded africa. africa was indeed exploited- however, africa exploited africa, europe simply entered the fray at that time.
also, my father is first generation descendents of the slavs- (czech) the original slaves- where the word came from. where is my redemption?
ok, you are hell bent on comparing conferderats to nazies. here's another attempt to debunk this myth. nazi germany was ethnic cleansing/genocide. they wanted to rid the earth of jews. early america, confederates, were not ethnic cleansing, in fact, many white plantation owners/politicians had sex/relationships with slaves and procreated. i will go ahead and save the argument on ur side- yes, some were raped, but not all. they obviously did not want to rid the earth of africans.
so now that im back, are you gonna gethafuqoutahere? i hope u stay and continue our debate.
« on: May 16, 2007, 03:07:34 AM »
with all due respect, would u mind sharing ur lsat gpa with us just for informational purposes. you got into santa clara, a rather good school. u must have not done THAT bad...
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26  28 29 30