11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Too many people are lying
« on: June 30, 2007, 01:50:55 PM »Lol, JGR, you're trying too hard now, buddy.
What up Hank.
Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion
Resources
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Too many people are lying« on: June 30, 2007, 01:50:55 PM »Lol, JGR, you're trying too hard now, buddy. What up Hank. 12
Studying for the LSAT / Too many people are lying« on: June 30, 2007, 01:48:06 PM »
Every poster could not be getting a 178, 172, 175.
You are telling me the 1 percent of people who get these scores all post on LSD? 13
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:22:26 PM »AH! Has everyone else gotten their scores already? My update box just says 07/02/07. Good job. 14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:17:31 PM »No it was not one setion. Some people had the dog game. Some people had the railroad reading comp. I belive everyone had a repeat section.I had neither. Mine was not a reissue. I doubt that. Maybe you never praticed a section so you did not see the difference. I doubt they would give some people repeats and not other people. That would be totally screwed up. 15
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:16:13 PM »BRUTUAL scale. I got a 163, very disappointed. THE DAMN EXPIRMENT SECTION. I KNEW IT WOULD KILL PEOPLE. NOT ONLY DID THEY USE REPEATS.THEY USE REPEATS FOUND IN THE MAJOR PREP CLASSES LESSONS. 
16
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:15:11 PM »You know, it seems to me that if the experimental is such a useful tool, as they proclaim, that they would take the time to make use of it and write their own questions for it. That is why i cancelled. The expirmental screwed me up. I did not do so well on the first logic games section. So i was hoping that was the expirmental. Then i get a repeat RC. The RC that was in my powerscore class. It was a lesson we went over. So my mind turned off. Then it was hard to get back into LSAT mode. I never thought they would do something like that. 17
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:10:49 PM »I'm still not believing that...that scale is ridiculous. With relatively hard LR questions and a new RC section I don't think it's possible for them to give us one of the hardest scales ever. No it was not one setion. Some people had the dog game. Some people had the railroad reading comp. I belive everyone had a repeat section. 18
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 01:04:53 PM »I'm still not believing that...that scale is ridiculous. With relatively hard LR questions and a new RC section I don't think it's possible for them to give us one of the hardest scales ever. Its true . The trick was the expiremental. It was from the powerscore and testmasters course books. Infact it was in the lessons. Most people who prepared would remember the Railroad passage, or the dogs game. The dogs game was in the powerscore lesson book and the bible. So it gave people a mental break. THAT = HARDER SCALE. 19
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 12:59:27 PM »
i knew i should CANCEL! DAMN
20
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2007 Score Posted!« on: June 30, 2007, 12:57:18 PM »
DAMN SCALE SUCKSS
|