This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ericptk2000
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9  11 12
« on: April 20, 2007, 12:12:09 AM »
That or make yourself as nervous as you can on all of your real answers and try to keep as calm as possible on all of your lies. Probably won't work and they will know exactly what you are up to, but worth a shot. Maybe even convince yourself for a month that your real name is not Lampshade Punk (try light bulb preppy). It might just throw that machiene way off!!
« on: April 20, 2007, 12:07:31 AM »
I guess if they have a policy that directly states you will not be hired if you used that type of drug, then rationally (although not ethically) it would be better to lie. I think Polygraphs are only 99%+ accurate, so you could always tell people that you are HONESTLY part of that 1% in which the machine screwed up and save face. Seriously though, in this case you might as well lie if you had done the drug because you would gain nothing from telling the truth.
« on: April 20, 2007, 12:01:25 AM »
Yea, there are actual psychological studies that indicate the more you tell someone you are honest the more likely you are being dishonest. Not implying you are lying, just something that is a little bit interesting.
« on: April 19, 2007, 11:56:50 PM »
It was actually kind of a joke, but the question certainly sounds a bit suspicious. Anyway, it seems like a lose lose situation because if you are taking a polygraph it is extremely difficult to beat. People do beat it, but I think it would take some training and if it was a serious polygrapher, they know how to look for cheaters.
« on: April 19, 2007, 11:51:04 PM »
Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. for the next 30 schools since I did not apply.
Still waiting on Case!
« on: April 19, 2007, 11:49:28 PM »
It seems to me that you better hope the DOJ doesn't track these threads because you are gonna be screwed. Hope the drug wasn't that bad! Good luck either way.
« on: April 18, 2007, 06:49:05 PM »
It is like a law school version of the fight club. I wonder who will win.
« on: April 17, 2007, 03:40:27 PM »
Not sure how many Deans Michigan has had, but from what I hear Heaven's has been there for an eternity. This guy is not only knowledgeable but he is omniscient. Down side is that he is also omnipresent, so don't think you can get away with missing a class.
« on: April 17, 2007, 01:33:24 AM »
If you go to Pitt, since I believe you said that you lived in the Pitt area, it would only cost about 60k because of in-state tuition. Whereas out of state tuition at Cooley would cost you roughly $11,500 per year for a total of $34,500, I think you would be better off going to Pitt.
Anyway, I am sure this is a flame and not worth the time responding. Does anyone know how you can determine whether a school "scholarship stacks"? I am interested in finding out whether MSU does this. Thanks.
« on: April 09, 2007, 07:18:09 PM »
Sorry, I couldn't resist mocking those 1L (student's from Great schools) who put up the taking question's threads. Anyway, does anyone know roughly what percentage of students at MSU lose their scholarship?
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9  11 12