41
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?
« on: October 01, 2008, 01:26:21 AM »
You weren't supposed to read that. ONWARD AND UPWARD orsomething...
Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion
Resources
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
41
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?« on: October 01, 2008, 01:26:21 AM »You weren't supposed to read that. ONWARD AND UPWARD orsomething... 42
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?« on: September 30, 2008, 11:05:03 PM »
f-ing kill me. Somebody. Anybody. Please. Right here.
43
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?« on: September 29, 2008, 03:02:21 PM »And is it acceptable usage? Why is "there" an unnecessary word? I don't like your faulty assumption in point 3. 44
General Off-Topic Board / Re: The Overnight Posters Club« on: September 28, 2008, 10:53:16 PM »
::BREATHES FIRE::
45
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?« on: September 22, 2008, 10:44:22 PM »Is this law school or therapy? AFAIC, this may be THE most important thing you ever learn for your career. *A general "you". Not just Mu, specifically. 46
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Hair length.« on: September 22, 2008, 08:55:40 PM »I'm a guy, and I'll be starting at LS in 2009. I know that the law is a pretty conservative profession, and I wanted to know how long hair is viewed. I've been traveling overseas for about a year, and have grown my hair while I've been here. I've gotten pretty used to it being long- right now its about upper shoulder length- and it's well taken care of and groomed. I don't really think it would effect me while I'm actually at LS per say, but what about when I have interviews. Even if it is shortened to neck length, and in good condition, what would the people interviewing me think, from a general point of view? Length didn't seem to be a problem, although I think it depends on who you're interviewing with. Cleanliness and presentation seem more important. PM me for more info. Too lazy to respond to threads. 47
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Shouldn't we all?« on: September 22, 2008, 08:48:19 PM »
[drive-by]
Apparently, people were wondering how I would react to this news: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/22/africa/22mbeki.php Well, basically, we're all screwed. But I don't think so for the reasons you'd think, necessarily. PM me if you want to talk some African politics. I'm rusty, but I love to hate it. Miss P, I demand one from you. hahahahah Also, I'd just like to say, although you all probably know this already, that Mu, goalie, G, Cady, and even Stanley/ghost/ethereal omniscient LSD being are all f-ing awesome IRL. Not that others aren't. Just reinforcing the notion from recent experience with this particular motley crew. Also also, I'd just like to reinforce that, despite my mention of a "motley crew", Motley Cru still blows. Thanks to all. Sax, your slut pic killed me. Later, etc. I will be back on LSD on a more full-time basis shortly. (Oh, also also also, credo, PM me!) Love, J [/drive-by] 48
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Suggest a new Screen Name for another LSDer« on: September 17, 2008, 06:12:09 AM »
<-- Stanley Watson III
50
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Brutally Effective.« on: September 16, 2008, 10:40:57 PM »Hi (mostly) non1Ls. ::enjoys:: |