# Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

### Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

### Messages - Poops

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 42
51
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: Formal Logic Problem giving me trouble
« on: April 20, 2007, 04:26:05 PM »
harvardorbust, I'm not understanding your inferences.  I really only understand formal logic using the some and most trains as described in powerscore.

I understand how you got T ---->M<--m--S which includes T---->M<--s-->S (most includes inference some right?) and T---->M---->D

However, your final inferences I can't understand.

T<--s-->S (How did you get this inference?  Starting at T, to then take a train away from M, I thought you could only use a double arrow, double not arrow, or all arrow because some and most arrows do not count because they do not necessarily include the entire group (page 322 of Logic Reasoning Bible).

I'm sorry for being all technical, but I can only understand formal logic using this method.  If you could please help I would REALLY appreciate it.

Listen pal; you don't need a diagram to make an inference for this; we see that some S is older than M (that's our inference from "most"; but we also know that all T are older than M; but since some S is older than M and not all, we can assume that some S are not as old as T because all T are older than M and only some S are older than M;

52
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: Formal Logic Problem giving me trouble
« on: April 20, 2007, 04:05:21 PM »
Thx Syzer.

And Piggy, I agree that your answer was fine. It's just that I have seen a couple of LSAT problems that made similar distinctions so I thought I would point it out to Syzer so that he would be vary of such cases.

Umm. Does that pig have TWO SNOUTS AND ONE EYE?! Haha. I just noticed that!! WTH?!?! I thought it was one of those "mirror" images. FREAKY!!

PS: rmkrause, that's exactly how I diagrammed it on the test.

you have to thank me actually

53
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: Formal Logic Problem giving me trouble
« on: April 20, 2007, 03:52:33 PM »
1. All tulip trees are older than the maples.
2. NOT ALL of the sycamores are older than the maples.

2 means that some of the sycamores are younger than some of the maples, right?  So if all of the tulip trees are older than the maples, some of the sycamores must be younger than all of the tulip trees.

hth.

Actually Piggy, that's not entirely correct reasoning. Sorry if it seems like I'm nitpicking but you have to be careful about these things on the LSAT.

Statement #2 says that some of the sycamores are not older than any maple tree. You cannot assume that the sycamores are younger than some of the maples. It could be the case that every sycamore that is not older than any maple is actually the same age as the maple tree.

Thanks for explanation man
They are so thorough;keep it up please

54
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: why ziplocks?
« on: April 20, 2007, 12:21:02 PM »

I just imagined myself carrying a ziplock on subway on my way to a writing centre. I can tell you that that would the most embarrassing moment of my life if any of my peers see me with a ziplock
you can always do it Las Vegas style
like when you take beer into strip clubs that dont serve but allow you to have it
it just has to be in a brown paper bag at the door, and there is usually a trash can for the brown bag near the entrance
except you wont have to pay the doorman \$20 for the paper bag at the door

ROFLLLLLll

55
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: LIVE LSAT CHAT TONIGHT 7pm PST/10pm EST!
« on: April 20, 2007, 12:20:12 PM »
INTERNET RELAY CHAT

irc://irc.everywherechat.com/lsatchat

Just your friendly reminder!

Come join Jeffort, Liz, and others tonight starting at 10pm EST/7pm PST as they dissect difficult LSAT questions!

People pay \$\$\$ to get live tutoring from Testmasters/Powerscore/PR/Kaplan.
Take advantage of this opportunity as these qualified individuals offer their services for FREE!

If you don't have an irc client like mIRC, then go to: irc.everywherechat.com:8000/login.htm

Click: "Sign On" (Use your LSD username instead of "guest" so we know who you are.)

Then type (without quotes): "/join lsatchat"

Hope to see you all there!

PS - You can also join the chat by registering on Jeffort's website

(I would have posted on the other thead but it's already grown so much. I thought a fresh new short thread would be better.)
\

do we know you?

56
##### Studying for the LSAT / why ziplocks?
« on: April 19, 2007, 07:11:49 PM »

I just imagined myself carrying a ziplock on subway on my way to a writing centre. I can tell you that that would the most embarrassing moment of my life if any of my peers see me with a ziplock

57
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Live Chat Discussion Sessions
« on: April 19, 2007, 01:46:03 AM »
Poops, how about Friday night 7ish pacific time...liz? okay?

wroks for me as well.. it;s 9 eastern time?? sorry no clue about pacific time but i am fine with Friday
Thanks people and sorry about that

10 eastern

even better!! Thank You guys once again!

58
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: Any September LSAT takers?
« on: April 19, 2007, 01:30:14 AM »
quick!  look something up!

I am sorry for my offensive comments, Julie. They were so out of place

59
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Live Chat Discussion Sessions
« on: April 19, 2007, 01:29:40 AM »
Poops, how about Friday night 7ish pacific time...liz? okay?

wroks for me as well.. it;s 9 eastern time?? sorry no clue about pacific time but i am fine with Friday
Thanks people and sorry about that

60
##### Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Live Chat Discussion Sessions
« on: April 19, 2007, 12:58:07 AM »
why dont you guys figure it out and get back to me.

lol kk

people can we do Monday??? or any other day but this Sunday  .
We can do Friday, Saturday, or even tomorrow

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 42