Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - cs_rudy

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13
I can't tell you when I last saw it, but I can tell you this: I went to the law school forum in Los Angeles and one of the LSAT writers said that there will no longer be multiple question stimuli. I was somewhat surprised that he came out and said that, so take it for what it's worth.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: weaken , flaw and inference Q help
« on: November 17, 2007, 11:01:16 AM »
The last one is E. The author gives no reason why the recent report is more reliable than the older report, so he doesn't have the basis to claim that the older report should be discarded.

I don't recall anyone asking about writing the wrong schools name on one's personal statement, Shi.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: June '07
« on: November 15, 2007, 12:15:38 PM »

I got the same score as you did on the June test and was scoring about the same on my PT's. I don't think December will be as bad, though, -8 for a 170 is unprecedented to say the least.

Kansas and Journey. These two music groups will help you achieve epic levels of focus.

Studying for the LSAT / Help With LR Strengthen Question...
« on: November 12, 2007, 10:55:50 PM »
Advances in photocopying technology allow criminals with no printing expertise to counterfeit paper currency. One standard anti counterfeiting  technique, micro printing, prints paper currency with tiny designs that cannot be photocopied distinctly. Although counterfeits of micro printed currency can be detected easily by experts, such counterfeits often circulate widely before being detected. An alternative , though more costly, printing technique would print currency with a special ink. Currency printed with the ink would change color depending on how ordinary light strikes it, whereas photocopied counterfeits of such currency would not. Because this technique would allow anyone to detect photocopied counterfeit currency easily, it should be adopted instead of micro printing, despite the expense.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the recommendation made by the argument?

A. When an anti counterfeiting technique depends on the detection of counterfeits by experts, the cost of inspection by experts adds significantly to the cost to society of that technique.

B. For any anti counterfeiting technique to be effective, the existence of anti counterfeiting techniques should be widely broadcast, but the method by which counterfeits are detected should be kept secret.

C. The process of micro printing paper currency involves fewer steps than does the printing of paper currency with the special ink.

D. Before photocopying technology existed, most counterfeits of paper currency were accomplished by master engravers.

E. Many criminals do not have access to the advanced photocopiers that are needed to produce counterfeits of micro printed paper currency that cashiers will accept as real.

As always, I will post the correct answer once I get a few responses.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Liz, cum hear dood...
« on: November 11, 2007, 10:06:13 PM »
Sorry. You're right. I was just being an a-hole.

What I meant to say is: You shouldn't go to the same law school as me.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Flawed method of reasoning - diagram?
« on: November 11, 2007, 09:10:19 AM »
HDUBS can you please include ALL answer choices. I don't mind helping you, but I would like to learn something myself as well. Also, don't tell us which is the CR right with the answer choices. If you do this people are bound to justify an answer choice on the basis of the fact that it is right and give you incomplete answers.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Beginning of trend of increasing RC difficulty?
« on: November 10, 2007, 04:11:21 PM »
I have heard this as well, but what makes it more difficult? In my opinion the RC has remained rather consistent, on balance, or maybe even gotten a bit easier with the advent of comparative questions.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: explanation please?
« on: November 10, 2007, 02:13:38 PM »
I don't have your TM book in front of me, but the stimulus clearly provides the percentage of accidents that took place on the left. Either it's wrong in the answer choice or it's wrong in the stimulus, but somewhere it should say "right".

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13