Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - cs_rudy

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: anyone on the West Coast get their scores yet?
« on: December 20, 2007, 06:55:42 PM »
I got mine at 2:12 PM pst. I'm in los angeles, but I took my test in redlands. I don't flame.

12
PM it I'll take a look

13
Studying for the LSAT / Re: GMAT after LSAT, anyone here done that?
« on: December 07, 2007, 11:35:44 AM »
I wouldn't normally post this on LSD but due to the nature of this thread it seems fitting.

What are the powerscore bibles of the GMAT prep world? I need to take the GMAT and I want to buy the best prep materials possible. If anyone could provide a list of the best study books, I would appreciate it.

14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: GMAT after LSAT, anyone here done that?
« on: December 07, 2007, 03:04:31 AM »
I love the unsupported assertion in the last posters post that because the GMAT is graded on a curve there's no difference in "difficulty". What does the curve have to do with anything? Are the questions more difficult or are they not?

15
Personal Statement / Re: Anyone willing to read a FINAL PS draft?
« on: November 30, 2007, 12:34:13 AM »
I'll read it if you'd like.

16
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Assumption question
« on: November 30, 2007, 12:23:38 AM »
C---> not T

P---> T

Conclusion:

P---> not H

   or

H---> not P

We need a premise that makes this conclusion follow. If we combine our other terms we get:

C--->not T--->not P

or

P--->T--->not C

Answer choice B says H--->C, which yields:

H--->C--->not T--->not P

simplified: H--->Not P

Thus B allows the argument to be properly drawn.

17
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Conditional Reasoning question
« on: November 30, 2007, 12:16:20 AM »
MB ---> D

D ---> I

Therefore, MB ---> I; S ---> Not MB

S--->not MB is unsupported, so we need a premise that supports it.

Answer choice D says "the spirit is perfect" which is the same as saying the spirit is not imperfect.

S--->not I

If we take the contrapositive of MB ---> I, we get not I---> not MB. If we combine this with D we get:

S--->not I--->not MB

Which yields S--->not MB, which is the unsupported part of the conclusion.

18
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How Many Hours Do I Need To Study?
« on: November 29, 2007, 09:42:55 PM »
If you're already reading prosser and keaton, you only need around 22.5 hours.

19
Studying for the LSAT / Re: my best LR score yet!!!!
« on: November 28, 2007, 08:40:48 PM »
I missed a record high 5 on the second section of September '07 and as I went over them, they were all really easy. Something about that last section is mind numbing.

20
Studying for the LSAT / Re: December 2003/Test 42: Game 4: Question 19
« on: November 27, 2007, 11:37:12 AM »
Ahhh...thanks. I took it to mean that two reviewers had to review more than one play together (which could only be M and O). So O would always be greater than K. Now I get it. Thanks Jeffort.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14