Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - dashrashi

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 360
101
I mostly said it because it was true. He is an angry little thing as is, though, isn't he? I find him simply comma appalling.

I tend to agree that I could beat his ass lawyer-wise. Baseless assumptions, jumping to conclusions, extreme hubris? Not what I tend to look for in an attorney's argumentation style. Anyway, I flirt with the jurors. Bomp chicka wow wow.

102
I'm sorry if it offended you, and I certainly didn't mean it to apply to anyone beyond the OP.

103
[redacted]

104
I mean, inasmuch as he was hoping strangers on the internet would fawn over his LSAT score. I think he's kind of struck out as far as that goes, though.

105
Flame. Got it. Thanks for the, uh, "tip"-off at the end. Ba-dum-ching.

Out of curiosity, if you can answer a single question without arrogance, annoyance or derision, would you feel at all badly if I am genuinely a random person, who came upon this forum because of being uncertain about what he should do?

No... I don't suspect you would care at all actually.  Your goal is merely to increase your own narcissism at the cost of sacrificing others (though the actual sacrifice only goes as far as in your mind).

Good luck to you, if you deal with clients, students, and/or jurists even 1/10th as badly as you do here, you're likely a federal employee and resigned to a life of mediocrity  :-\

I wouldn't feel badly because for most of this thread, that's exactly what I assumed you are. And with your initial posts, you had as much empathy from me as anyone would get. Then...you started getting points deducted. And like any good French Olympic judge, I'll stand by those deductions. I prefer thinking you're a flame because it depresses me that someone like you (purport to be) could actually get through 20-odd years of life without the figurative smackdown you so richly deserve.

Also, you are a seriously terrible writer: "Your goal is merely to increase your own narcissism at the cost of sacrificing others (though the actual sacrifice only goes as far as in your mind)." ...What? What does that even mean? Is that in English? How does one have a goal to increase one's narcissism at the cost of sacrificing others? Do I have an altar I sacrifice them on? Narcissism isn't something we understand as people trying to increase--people are narcissistic, which leads them do certain things, but it doesn't connote a goal in and of itself. This is not because I disagree with your point, note; it's because you're using the words in a, uh, highly non-standard way. Again, I do not think these words mean what you think they mean when strung together in this order. Earlier, you called my posts "banter," which again shows that you're not familiar with connotations of words. "Banter" implies congeniality/friendliness, perhaps even flirtatiousness. You don't use it to describe (what you clearly perceive as) someone attacking you.

So. My prescription, actually, in the spirit of presuming that you're an actual person, is that you need to work on your writing. Smaller words--fewer syllables, fewer SAT words, etc. More Hemingway, less Faulkner, as I always say. That and LSN will probably help you more than strangers on the internet fawning over your LSAT score.

106
Flame. Got it. Thanks for the, uh, "tip"-off at the end. Ba-dum-ching.

107
I think we have all been too hard on Technologic, and, because of our natural inclination to resist brilliance, we have considered his perfection unobtainable.  All hail Technologic and his wonderful LSAT score.  He will surely defy the odds and emerge from a top 5 law school with a perfect GPA.  He will then go on to become the first Supreme Court Justice that both conservatives and liberals can agree upon... in short, he will be the savior of the universe.  ::)

I think you're probably right. How could I have been so blind?

108
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« on: May 22, 2009, 03:12:39 PM »
Not Yale. I know the classes in the Geology dep't (good morning, gut class, how do you do?) and Oceanography is not a strong enough presence to provide you with a major. Also, you're basically disallowed from triple majoring. I only ever met one person that did it, and they were like Elec Engineering/Comp Sci/Math, so there was a LOT of overlap. Additionally, you would have to be seriously f-ing stupid to get a 2.4 at Yale, I don't care how many science classes you take.

109
General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« on: May 22, 2009, 03:00:38 PM »
I've decided that, essentially, he's full of *&^%. Now it's "top 2 in some areas," and god only knows which publications he's even talking about. South Carolina Education Monthly or similar, perhaps.

Oops, there I go with my childish religious references.

110
Not to be an a-hole (you've got the monopoly in this thread, and I don't intend to challenge you for the crown), but you're edging into Cooley-rankings territory, all of which makes it even less likely that a school will overlook your GPA. Sorry.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 360