because only stupid asses do a "Pre-Law major, while usually only intelligent mofos engage in a Physics or Philosophy major. Therefore, the Physics and Phil. majors will not do better on the LSAT because they were trained to do so, it is more in the virtue of them being intelligent.
Hunny, its a classic flawed argument, your attacking the person instead of an argument. I guess all that philosophy training didn't help much. So let me say this: a pre-law major (I am a "legal studies" major- same difference) changes heavily between colleges. I go to a private liberal arts school, and my curriculum required me to take courses in philosophy, heavy history, literature, sociology, english, law (legal writing, specific areas), logic, humanities, computer, some business, some mathematics, geography, politics, etc. I also used my required electives credits to incorporate a minor in social sciences. And yes, before you ask, I took classes at every level from 101 up to the top, and took courses at 2 different colleges. My degree is very well rounded, thank you. I have also seem some um..."characters" in philosophy classes...and I don't expect to see them passing me in the law school halls. I am not saying by any means that philosophy majors are not brilliant by the way, just that not all are "only intelligent mofos". I am sure you philosophy majors will have seen some people in class that just plain shouldn't have been allowed through the door. Philosphy is hard, and so are a lot of other majors. My point is, don't dump on someone else's major. Maybe they were just interested in it- and like others have said- no major is required for law school. It's personal preference.
Ok- I'm done venting now. Woohoo! The LSAT is over, let's party!