Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - rizz

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11]
Studying for the LSAT / Re: The Four Stages of the LSAT
« on: October 17, 2006, 06:54:14 PM »
Ahhhhh - you're all ridiculous!  162 =/= worst law school ever ... it can be a tier 1 or 2 school!

It's not all or nothing - don't freak out everyone!

Looks like someone's hit stage three already. Way to break the curve.

Law School Admissions / Re: All of you high school kids
« on: October 17, 2006, 04:42:56 PM »
My name is rizz and I approve this message.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: quick/dumb question
« on: October 17, 2006, 04:39:34 PM »

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Engineering, what's the deal?
« on: October 17, 2006, 04:30:03 PM »
I hate to tell you eagle, but engineers are smarter than you. This is why you are frustrated. There is no such thing as an 'engineer who can't cut it'. If a student can make it through the rigors of the engineering cirriculum, then they HAVE what it takes to be an engineer. I laughed when I read your post. Stupid liberal arts kids always make me laugh. And as ionlyknowy stated, there is no 'law' major. There are institutions that actually have a pre-law major, but if you decide to take this you better have what it takes to become a lawyer. If not, then you are crap out of luck when it comes to job opportunities. I am still laughing so hard ad your nonsensical jibberish that I cannot even think properly.

How is this for an idea, switch to an engineering major. Then you wouldn't have to cry because you are not as 'special'.

Daddy doesn't love you.

Go jump off a cliff. Seriously, I'm sure you'll be a pleasure to work with.

Haha, just kidding, you're alright.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: RC Changes?
« on: October 17, 2006, 01:20:16 PM »
I'm not surprised. Historically the lsat has evolved pretty quickly. That we've had the same format for almost 15 years now means we are due for some significant changes. This sounds pretty minor though.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAC Alert....
« on: October 17, 2006, 01:15:49 PM »
Yep, they did this to me too.

More and more i'm think it's a requirement to be a sadistic villian with a handlebar mustache in order to work at LSAC.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Today's Meeting
« on: October 16, 2006, 04:49:02 PM »
Hey good to know!

well, ttyl

Studying for the LSAT / Re: PMs (poll)
« on: October 16, 2006, 02:29:43 PM »
I will look forward to disclosure day when we can finally see just how accurate it was.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAC Access
« on: October 16, 2006, 01:45:25 PM »
Why do you guys even use citrix? Just press cancel when that selection screen comes up. I use linux and it works fine.

Canadian Law Students / Re: McGill, GPA's and LSAT
« on: October 16, 2006, 12:07:20 PM »
you people are all insane and don't know what you're talking about. BUT, just to throw my two cents (which are extremely relevant here). i had a 3.18 GPA and a 164 LSAT, and I got into mcgill, even though my application was late. i barely got into wisconsin in the US school i applied to. a few T20 waitlists, but that was about it.

May I ask what were your extra currics and year trends? 3.18 sounds very low for a school that weights GPA so heavily.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11]