Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ySKhYr

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
how do you know columbia doesn't require one this year?  did you call the admissions office?

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Can't finish the entire TM course
« on: June 25, 2007, 11:33:08 PM »
back to the original thread topic, this just me of course, but i went to class up to lesson 9 or so and ended up fine.  the rest i felt was not very essential; really the most essential was to build a good foundation, which you can establish after around 5 or 6 courses.  the rest is up to you.  i went to 9 courses, quit completely for a couple months due to school starting, and then studied again a week or two before the actual test.

lol......these posts are great

for a slightly more serious response, i went from start finish in my lsat study process hating logic games.  but then again, i missed 2 on the actual test, and if i had gotten those 2 questions right i would have exactly your score.  so maybe you're onto something here... ::)


Studying for the LSAT / Re: buy my Logical Reasoning Question - ha
« on: January 29, 2007, 09:57:52 PM »

Studying for the LSAT / Re: did so so on SAT, but did well on the LSAT?
« on: January 26, 2007, 01:37:09 AM »
fairly strong correlation here too--1530 and 176.  Even though they're very different tests, I think it takes a lot of the same skills and test-taking acumen to be good at them.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Do you draw out every formal logic question?
« on: January 24, 2007, 08:58:33 PM »
hm, i dont think i diagrammed a single LR question on the actual LSAT.  after a certain point you can just see it in your head.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Freaking Out
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:51:39 AM »
Heh, I know how you feel...the first time i EVER finished a games section getting -0 was 3 days before the actual test.  However, that was the only time it would ever happen to me.  I averaged about -6 to -8 LG right up until the actual test.  I got lucky on test day (more focused?  more adrenaline?  not sure) and got -2.  Don't let it get to you.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: 170+ requires your innate ability
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:53:08 PM »
i have completely changed my opinion after a thorough analysis of my personal performance.    sacrificing my social life(tonight was the first night ive been out in about a week) for the feb test ive been able to get my scores all the way up in to the 170 range.  i have been studying 4 hours a day and the only time i miss a question now is out of carelessness.   it is my contention that all that is needed for 170+ is a good memory, to recognize the sentance structures and logic patterns, and a fair amount of intelligence. granted, someone with an iq of 100 would never be able to get a 170, but i beleive that most people in the 120+ range will be able to score well with dedication.    i have average intelligence(for a college student), but a very strong memory, and i am going to easily score above a 165. anyway, thats my new opininon.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5