Source = who he got it from
I can post whatever I want on this site or wikipedia and say it came from LSAC staff. Hell, that happens here every day! Plus, it was written with the body of the post, as if a quote, not a source.
Stop being so damn skeptical. He's telling the truth and this is word for word what my pre law advisors email said:
Here is an important announcement from LSAC concerning changes
to the format of the LSAT, beginning June 2007.
Beginning with the June 2007 administration, LSAC will
introduce a variant of reading comprehension, called
comparative reading, as one of the four sets in the LSAT
reading comprehension section. In general, comparative reading
questions are similar to traditional reading comprehension
questions. However, there is one significant difference:
instead of being based on one passage, comparative reading
questions are based on two short passages. The two passages
together are of roughly the same length as one reading
comprehension passage has been, so the total amount of reading
in the reading comprehension section will remain essentially
the same. A few of the questions that follow a comparative
reading passage pair might concern only one of the two
passages, but most questions will be about both passages and
how they relate to each other. More information, including
test preparation material for comparative reading, will be
available on the LSAC website (www.LSAC.org
) in mid-February
2007. This information will also appear in the printed LSAT &
LSDAS Information Book, to be distributed in February 2007.
Also beginning with the June 2007 LSAT, test takers will no
longer randomly be assigned one of two different kinds of
writing promptódecision or argumentófor the writing sample.
All test takers will be assigned a decision prompt. The
writing sample will continue to be unscored.
These two changes are a result of extensive research by LSAC
staff and consultations with the LSAC Test Development and
Director of Communications
Law Schools Admission Council
Undergraduate Director, Philosophy Department
Director, Temple Law Scholars Program
Boss you're going to feel stupid in the near future for trying to second guess everyone. Don't mix this OP or this message up with some of those prank september scores released threads.