Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - dbmuell

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
My supervisor is aware (good friend of mine) but since she has literally NO authority to grant me part time status, I will very soon have to sit down with her boss and lay out my plans.  My plan is to lay it out as "I am going to law school.  I would very much like to continue here part time while going to law school part time" rather than "may I go to law school and work part time?"  They're very understanding and I think he will approve it but the beauracracy here is astounding, so it will likely go through months of HR buck-passing before I know for sure.  I almost feel bad bringing it up now since they just promoted me yesterday  ;D

So far it has not.  If this is a leading indicator that scores are on their way tomorrow, it would seem that they probably are not.  Anybody have an wisdom on this?

Law School Admissions / Re: I'm starting to have second thoughts.
« on: October 06, 2006, 11:05:47 AM »
I think the whole "most lawyers are unhappy" is a class LSAT-style causal reasoning fallacy.  It seems to me (from reading this board and other interactions) that a large portion of people that go into law school in the first place are classic overachievers.  While being an overachiever can make you very successful, it usually comes with a psychological cornucopia that includes low self esteem, workaholism, type-A style stress, and a constant need to "be the best."  For many, I think the unhappiness was inevitable due to internal psychological factors- becoming a lawyer and trying to make the big bucks was an effect, not the cause, of this factors.

I, for one, am not in this for the money.  I know full well that I'm going to go into a pretty decent debt load and come out the other side probably making less than I do now.  For that, I could care less. If I'm making less money, driving a little less car and can find work in law that I enjoy, I'll take it!

Law School Admissions / Re: I'm starting to have second thoughts.
« on: October 06, 2006, 10:00:14 AM »
I feel the same way as the earlier poster that said basically "If I don't do this, I will regret it for the rest of my life."  I have a very comfortable job as a Software Engineer, in a very comfortable town, good income, nice car, plenty of money in the bank.  My work-life balance is excellent.  So why am I considering a career in law?  I'm considering a career in law because every M-F morning, I wake up, drive to work, get to my cube and spend the next 8 hours watching the clock tick down so I can leave this boring job that I have no passion for.  I can't imagine what it would feel like after I've been doing this for 35 years...

The reason I relate my experience is to raise this question: All things financial aside, are you doing what you want to be doing in life? Are you happy going to work and doing the job that you're doing now, or do you see yourself more happy doing something else?  Put all financial matters aside and think of this honestly.  Will your kids' lives really be upset by the fact that you lacked for money for three years?  More so, would being a a job you dislike cause other reactions in your homelife that might be even worse?  Remember, you have a LOT of years left to work.  If you're not happy doing what you do, there's no better time to fix it....

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Were you one of these LSAT test takers?
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:47:19 AM »
I was that guy.  I'm actually worried that if my cursive is as illegible as it seemed to be that they would withold my score.  Can this happen?

Even though I know he is likely being sarcastic, I think that Mr. Future hits on a very interesting consideration that  reflects on how our society defines "earning" something.  It seems to me that one of the core foundations of capitalistic society is that there are 3 ways to justly achieve a higher income or status: hard work, luck, and assumption of risk.  The first two are obvious but what of "assumption of risk?"

Ingrained in our notion of "success" is the fact that one need not necessarily be the smartest or hardest working to achieve it. Sometimes the successful person is just the person with the "biggest stones" who puts the most on the line in hopes of achieving the highest award (IE- putting your life savings on the line to invest in a risky venture that takes off). Likewise, when someone makes the decision to cheat on the LSAT, they are making a huge gamble in hopes of a (likely) moderate increase in score. They put it all in and take a risk that most of us would never dream of: banking their entire (legal) future on the fact that they will not get caught.  Considering the the odds are heavily stacked against them, they are taking a perilous bet and it could be argued that they have technically "earned" their higher score by virtue of being willing to take that gamble and risk losing out on LS altogether. 

My favorite analogy  for this is the guy on the motorcycle that weaves in and out of a traffic jam, conceivably arriving at his destination sooner than everyone else.  This angers a great deal of people, as they feel that it is "unfair" that he should arrive sooner than them at his destination and they should have to wait.  In reality, I submit that he is "earning" his early arrival by assuming a litany of potential consequences. These include expensive traffic tickets, or simply being splattered all over the pavement.  This avenue of "unfairness" is available to everyone but most choose not to assume that risk- a choice on both sides of the issue.

While none of this really affects the issue of whether to "tell" on someone who is cheating (still your choice on whether to bring the risk of their venture down upon them), to me it raises some interesting considerations as to the ethics of cheating in a capitalistic society.  I would argue that cheating is neither just nor injust- simply a different way of playing the game.  Likewise, getting caught is neither just nor injust, but merely the laws of probability paying a visit to someone who made a lofty gamble. Much like with short-term winners at poker, those laws of probability seemingly would assure that someone who makes a lifestyle of cheating will get caught eventually.  A gamble that they choose and a consequence that they will have to live with.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: TESTMASTERS Weekend Course...Worth It??
« on: October 05, 2006, 01:14:36 PM »
Having done the PS full length course, I tend to think that you would be bored to tears in just about any class if you are practicing in the low 170s. Remember, when you take a course, the class will slow down and wait EVERY time somebody does not understand an answer.  You will spend most of your time listening to the instructor explaining material to people who are crossing their fingers and praying for a 150, while the material will come almost immediately to you (disclaimer: not intended as a dig on people scoring in the 150s).  I was not a particularly high scorer (low to mid 160s on my preps) and I was often bored stiff.  The courses offer generally good instruction but if you're already scoring well, you're much better off with private tutoring, self-study or just an insane amount of practice.

I agree with all above but I find some added bonuses.  I feel like all the time spent with RC passages has really increased my overall rate of comprehension.  When I ready magazine articles/essays/news I find that I am retaining a lot more of the little details and finer points.  I also feel like I've learned to really pick apart people's bulls**t at a much faster rate by immediately identifying faulty logic.  Overall, I'm better off for having done it!

Studying for the LSAT / Re: What do I do with my life now?
« on: September 30, 2006, 12:43:22 PM »
Drink, heavily.

Studying for the LSAT / What's with the people who can't follow directions?
« on: September 30, 2006, 12:33:46 PM »
Is it normal for the LSAT that some f**ktard that can't follow directions requires the rest of us to sit there while the proctor deals with them?  We had Ms. "Writing on the book when we've clearly been told we shouldn't have pencils in our hands," Mr. "My watch is beeping so now we all have to wait while the proctor puts it outside" and the killer duo of the anonymous "My cell phone is rining while the proctor reads the instructions" and Ms. "it couldn't be me because my cell phone is right here and it's not ringing."

Is it possible that this many people taking the LSAT are incapable of reading the simple, one-page directions that print right along with your admission ticket?  If you are one of these people, we all thank you dearly for extending our torture because you can't handle elementary directions...

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5