Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cinnamon synonym

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52
451
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 30, 2015, 06:47:01 AM »
Random posts about internet ghosts
And jokes about posts fall flat on most
Finding fault in YouTube videos and canisters of toast
Not uranium fooled not once but twice makes Iraq and Libya
A host of miscalculated votes by a third rate politician
From Pennsylvania who boasts to her daughter and leaders of nations
That organized militants calculated the flimsy cia installation on the Benghazi coast.
Legally free to eat Indian food and laugh and toast  how to roast congress is most
Important but to family members of the deceased her internet YouTube video and Iraq war vote
Bloats and
Bleeds American blood. And obfuscation from a liary person dosed out close to the truth but really scum from the bottom of a foggy moat. Thank god she resigned her blasť blouse from the joust. Be warned trinity what rough beast cackles toward tricky male private part nixons
Ghost.

And really? I know more than anyone on the internet? Please, i know less. Don't be so bitter. Trin

What was that about asab? Trinity college Dublin, ireland scl. Lfmao


452
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 29, 2015, 08:03:33 PM »
Clintons testimony should have been private because all the others were private.  Her answers to the YouTube video questions were pathetic and it made her look like an uncaring cold human being.  It humanized her and exposed her disingenuous attitude towards other human beings.  She lied about the video, she knew it was a planned military attack and admitted as much but seems to be able to live with herself.

A private session would have spared the dead victims families the pain of watching her pathetic obfuscation and untruths.

Let's try this again, what, with the basic facts and understanding.

1. "All the others were private."Hillary requested it be public her celebrity brings tv cameras.  The other depositions were not blown out on commercial news channels. Plus, victims families got to listen to the bulkshitt all over again. Get it? I realize you were born yesterday, but this is surprising. You know that there are hours, and hours, and hours of prior footage of the people that they've had before them, but you've been too uninterested to watch?oh? I could have watched Sydney Blumenthal in real time? Missed that one. You can google it! Heck, there's this thing called "Youtube" that the secretive Benghazi committee posts selected videos too. Or, if you don't have much computer knowledge, you can watch C-SPAN. Of course, since your only real point is that testimony you don't like should be secret, so as not to interfere with what you want to be true, I suppose you could have a place in Stalin's Russia.
2. Yes, it was a terrorist attack. Of course, had you paid attention to what I said, or the prior dozen or so investigations, you would have known that already. You would have already known that the State Department was going to say that this was a possibility early on, and that the CIA (not State, not the Administration) changed that. Also- it wasn't her lying. Small point, but still. Attribution is so important, isn't it?I dont give a *&^% about the initial release by Hillary and her staff its what she said over the dead peoples dead bodies with their grieving family members. And the email to her daughter where she divulged what she truly knew.
3. As I explained to you before, I'm not partisan. I tried to explain the whole thing about polling, Bayesian predictions, and my own personal desire that facts get recounted instead of partisan I do believe that but you have a stronger lean to the democratic party because you are using their talking points.  Dont answer but think about when you last voted fir a rwpublican I'd rather Clinton didn't win- but I may end up voting for her over some of the current GOP candidates. [] We'll see. It's choosing between the evil of lessers. any candidate but trump would be the lesser of two evils. That is funnyOn the other hand, at least I take some small comfort in not projecting my personal "pathetic obfuscations and untruths" on to other people- so there's that, I guess.

Also? I don't seek out law discussion boards to rant about my personal and political insecurities. So I also have that working for me. oh, ok perhaps you don't rant but you do. But who cares. That's your style. Venting in a way and i accept it. I ginon this board because my work right after law school is  awesome but time consuming and I like to vent about  politics at this time in our election cycles 


Ask yourself this, when Clinton said that she still believes that a YouTube video might have had something to do with the attack on Benghazi do you honestly believe her?

I think you lean mostly to the left. Besides, I truly think bernie might be the only one standing in a few months. 

453
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 29, 2015, 07:32:28 PM »
hollow, cold, uncaring, and sinister......... she laughs and eats Indian food hours

Not sure that's illegal, impressive intestinal fortitude sure, but not illegal


and mixing up peoples names isn't proof of guilt or anything other than mixing up a name. At least she didn't say she was going to defend  "our allies in the north" of Korea............

The attack at Benghazi was horrible and the deaths were tragic but this could potential could have been prevented if the state department had not been so disorganized with regard to security issues.  It is a systemic failure. What is cold, disingenuous and sinister is factually acknowledging to a family member in an email and a foreign government official that the attack was an organized, calculated military attack and then standing over the dead bodies with family members present and telling them that a video caused the deaths.

Do you understand?

Shapiro was expressing that after being questioned about the details of what happened doesn't say she further contemplated how we should honor the dead and find ways to prevented it from happening again-- instead she details ordering Indian food and partying with her camp.  The dead and the seriousness of the Benghazi event are an after thought to Hillary Clinton.

I see why Republicans, independents and now some democrats are done with her.  Jj
I understand that the parts of your post that I responded to had jack to do with what you are asking if I understand. Do YOU understand? No. No you don't.

Oh, I get it you were pointing out the things that weren't illegal that mrs. Clinton did and making a joke about here constitution. Very funny. Sorry, I didn't mention it earlier. 

That's right maybe she didn't do anything illegal. Who cares, the FBI are handling Clintons litigation at the moment. That's something to make a joke about, right?

To the average independent voter who smells typically republican stupid bullshitt with Clintin its  her warped personality and ethics that have driven son of us, and continuing to drive us away from her.
She's unscrupulous maybe not legally culpable with regard to Benghazi.

So sorry if I offended you.

454
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 29, 2015, 07:44:24 AM »
Clintons testimony should have been private because all the others were private.  Her answers to the YouTube video questions were pathetic and it made her look like an uncaring cold human being.  It humanized her and exposed her disingenuous attitude towards other human beings.  She lied about the video, she knew it was a planned military attack and admitted as much but seems to be able to live with herself.

A private session would have spared the dead victims families the pain of watching her pathetic obfuscation and untruths.

455
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 29, 2015, 07:26:29 AM »
Loki,

Your pushback is partisan.  And intelligent people see through the bureaucratic bullshitt.  You have obviously drank the Democrat party talking points. You mischaracterize the FBI investigation in that you don't realize that Hillary Clinton and her own actions as well as her staff are being investigated by the FBI.  James Comey made a statement expressing how he will not comment on the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email setup.  You can't separate Hillary out of the equation.  Her emails didn't write themselves.

If you want to believe that a YouTube video was responsible for Benghazi and not some demonstration in Cairo, so be it.

I for one dont believe the bullshittt. I know now that Clinton is in deep doo doo.

So you may want to re read what you seem to believe yourself.

You are obviously a partisan Democrat talkin point guy.

I dont care who screwed up at the state department.  Maybe Clinton isn't to blame, it is a bloated bureaucratic department with system failures. Get it now loki???

Clinton knew it was an organized military attack and she boldfaced lied to the dead American families.  She blamed the event on a YouTube video but she admitted to her daughter what she truly knew.  That is a fact, not a talking point, my friend.

Have popcorn and watch the fall if a politician from grace--stop drinking the koolaide you dont even know you have been drinking.


456
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 29, 2015, 06:53:33 AM »
hollow, cold, uncaring, and sinister......... she laughs and eats Indian food hours

Not sure that's illegal, impressive intestinal fortitude sure, but not illegal


and mixing up peoples names isn't proof of guilt or anything other than mixing up a name. At least she didn't say she was going to defend  "our allies in the north" of Korea............

The attack at Benghazi was horrible and the deaths were tragic but this could potential could have been prevented if the state department had not been so disorganized with regard to security issues.  It is a systemic failure. What is cold, disingenuous and sinister is factually acknowledging to a family member in an email and a foreign government official that the attack was an organized, calculated military attack and then standing over the dead bodies with family members present and telling them that a video caused the deaths.

Do you understand?

Shapiro was expressing that after being questioned about the details of what happened doesn't say she further contemplated how we should honor the dead and find ways to prevented it from happening again-- instead she details ordering Indian food and partying with her camp.  The dead and the seriousness of the Benghazi event are an after thought to Hillary Clinton.

I see why Republicans, independents and now some democrats are done with her.  Jj

457
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 28, 2015, 02:05:30 PM »
I watched hillary clinton's testimony about benghazi and think that it should have been held in private and not a public session just like all of the others.  And,  get depositions privately.  This should not have been done before the cameras, since, number one it has been a bone of contention for democrats who claim that the whole thing is fabricated to make clinton look foolish or incompetent so that it affects her ability to run for office. It has been a bone of contention for Republicans in that Americans had been killed in an attack and repeated security  requests went unattended by someone.  Also,  someone began an idiotic rumor that a YouTube video provoked an obvious, calculated military attack.

I'm an independent and some of us dont care which party is in power--- we look at the lowest common denominator.  Occam's razor, so to speak.  A. Security requests were not heeded but the system failed and perhaos not one individual is to blame.   The buck stops with the one at the top--that would be Clinton-- but she doesn't subscribe to that whole  heartedly since she still seeks higher office.  She admits to the letters and the dictionary meaning of the word "responsibility" and that is fine, too because she was not hands on responsible for the lack of security.

  But her email to her daughter marked against her words vibrating over the metal caskets of our murdered Americans into the ears of Chris Stevens mother and father and the other family members also SHAMEFULLY RESONATES with this Independent as hollow, cold, uncaring, and sinister.



I read this great article, by Ben Shapiro, which while I don't agree with all of it, the tone, however of the piece is dead on reflective of Clintons character .  More importantly he rightfully points out her disgracefully cold and disingenuous behavior and words with the brave victims families.

In another universe she might have been an effective politician but she ultimately gets in her own way.

I think like Nixon, the FBI has finally caught up with her and she'll get the restraint she needs.

By Ben Shapiro
No, it  looks like Hillary Clinton Didn't Care About Chris Stevens

Oct. 28, 2015

Last week, the media hailed Hillary Clinton's supposed political triumph at a hearing of the House Select Committee on Benghazi concerning the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2012 that ended in the murder of four Americans, including American ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens. Clinton appeared calm and collected, even as she lied repeatedly: She said that she believed a YouTube video still bore some responsibility for the terrorist attack, despite the fact that she told the Egyptian prime minister the day after the attack that the video had nothing to do with the attack; she insisted that political hack Sidney Blumenthal didn't act as an advisor, even though he routinely emailed with her about policy; she stated that she'd been transparent about her emails, although that nonsense has been rejected by the State Department.


Most of all, Clinton suggested that Stevens had been responsible for his own murder. She said that he "felt comfortable" on the ground, and that he was merely joking when he emailed about whether the Benghazi compound would be closed. "Chris Stevens had ... a really good sense of humor," Clinton laughed. "And I just see him smiling as he's typing this." Stevens' State Department team in Libya sent requests for additional security 600 times. They were rejected.

After Clinton finished lying, she went home and hung out with her entire team. She partied. "I had my whole team come over to my house and we sat around eating Indian food and drinking wine and beer," Clinton told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. "That's what we did. It was great. ... They did a terrific job, you know, kind of being there behind me and getting me ready, and then, you know, just talk about what we're going to do next."

As an apparent afterthought, she added to Maddow, "The point is, what are we going to do both honor and the people that we lost, and try to make sure this doesn't happen again."

Chris Stevens was always an afterthought to Clinton, despite her crocodile tears at the hearing, where she complained, "I would imagine I've thought more about what happened than all of you put together. I've lost more sleep than all of you put together." She didn't give Stevens her private email address, though Blumenthal had it. She couldn't remember holding a single conversation with Stevens after he was appointed ambassador to Libya. The night of his death she sent an email with the subject line "Chris Smith," mixing up his name with that of fellow diplomat Sean Smith. She spoke to survivors only days later. The night of the attack, she didn't speak with the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey.

Clinton's aggressive case for the invasion of Libya led to the overthrow and killing of dictator Moammar Gadhafi -- an event for which Clinton was happy to take credit, laughing, "We came, we saw, he died." She then completely ignored Libya as it turned into a terrorist hellhole, because that inconvenient fact undercut her narrative of strength and purpose. Her State Department refused to grant additional security requests because doing so would have implicitly recognized the failure of her war. Then, after Stevens died, Clinton and her team lied to the American people and the families of the slain, pinning the murders on an unforeseeable YouTube video-driven attack, rather than an utterly foreseeable terrorist attack.

Clinton is a coldly manipulative, deeply ambitious politician willing to say and do anything to achieve power. She was always that person, which is why she lied to Americans from in front of the flag-draped caskets of the murdered men in Benghazi. And she is that person now, too, as she laughs and eats Indian food hours after maintaining her lies once again before the American people.


458
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 27, 2015, 06:36:25 AM »
You are not serious. You are a fool. You don't grasp the serious FBI investigation that IS going on.  I have quoted to you how the director of the FBI is following the investigation of Hillary Clinton.  Your August 18 statement is factual incorrect but it appears you drank some propaganda koolaide. And  now you rant about about this board.  You keep bringing up Benghazi????? I dont care about Benghazi. I know Clinton lied to the mothers and fathers of those who died in the Benghazi attack.    Yes, you are dense.

Your in denial about the fbi investigation which has eaten away Clinton's credibility, particularly among independents. 
If you don't want to acknowledge this its okay.

Please, dont harass me, thank you.

So, I say to you, go home Charlie brown.  If you can recognize the interest in a nixonian politician you don't belong in this discussion. There are plenty of other topics you can discuss on lsd.

You not good when it comes to Hillary, sorry my man.

Im not joking. Do not harass me any more.

459
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 26, 2015, 09:37:49 PM »
Chemerinksy for President!
Interesting choice.  Gun control?
He reminds me of an old al franken snl character.  That's a very sharp guy but I think he sees himself more as an advisor.  They have longevity in politics over a campaign junkee.

460
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: October 26, 2015, 12:13:07 PM »
You are really a funny one. 

If you believe that no candidate is being investigated by the FBI that is fine. 
But the fact is that James Comey, the director of the FBI is following closely  the FBI  investigation of one particular candidate who is running for president.

I bet you have no idea who that candidate is?



 I'll even  you a hint:  he said the persons name out loud and it has been quoted many times.

The FBI investigation into Nixon was very interesting to follow but I'm afraid that my interest into this present day investigation is even better.  The saga continues and it is very popcorn worthy.  And it is not going aww until the FBI finish their investigation.

Sorry to disappoint you but I just broke out the kosher salt for my popcorn.

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52