Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Maintain FL 350

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 97
Job Search / Re: 2L Summer & Post-Grad Employment Search & Alternatives
« on: January 20, 2016, 10:09:45 AM »
To Maintain FL 350 -

Thanks! I sure wish the employers respected my GPA too..

So to share a little about my background, I'm located in the Bay Area (San Francisco Bay Area - so think anywhere from Concord to Oakland to SF to Palo Alto) I'm willing to move within California but ideally stay in the Bay Area as I have a house here. Honestly at this point, salary requirement is up in the air. I really want a job that would put me near 80-90 K (yes I realize I might be daring to dream). In a perfect world, 100,000 (highly unlikely I realize). But realistically 60-70k to start would be nice? Too much to ask?

Alright, that does help. I'm in LA but I'm familiar with the Bay Area market. I lived there for a few years and my wife went to law school and worked in SF.

As you know, it is a very popular place to live and there is a lot of competition. Also, having a 3.0 from Berkeley provides different opportunities than a 3.0 from GGU. So it depends.

I would recommend looking at government offices throughout the region (Contra Costa, Alameda, even Sonoma/Rohnert Park/San Jose if you can do the commute). Also, assuming that you're not at Berkeley/Stanford, look at small and midsized firms in the suburbs. There are lots of small firms in Walnut Creek, Oakland etc. Be prepared for unpaid positions.

If you don't have a connection to the firm/office, I recommend dropping off your resume in person. Some people advise against this but I can tell you as someone who has sifted through the literally hundreds of resumes that pour into an office, being able to put a face with a name helps. Be polite, don't overstay your welcome, but introduce yourself and let them know how interested you are in what they do. You may only get to speak with the receptionist, but it's better than a blind resume drop.

$60-70,000 in the Bay Area is not unrealistic, but you're not going to get it without some marketable experience. It is IMPERATIVE that you get some legal experience under your belt. If that means an unpaid internship, take it. If it means helping draft MSJs in boring divorce cases, take it.

How to make connections? The fact is, some people are better at this than others. Incidentally, this is why I think most law students would benefit from a couple years of work experience before law school.

Here's an example. When I was in law school I took a class taught by an adjunct prof who was practiced a type of law that I was interested in. I did well in his class, was always prepared, and one day mentioned that I wanted to do what he did, and did he have any advice? He mentioned that his office had internships and that I should apply. Surprise surprise, I got the internship. I was not a top student (although I did well), and I was competing against people from much higher ranked schools. I got the internship because of the connection. Hopefully that helps.

Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« on: January 20, 2016, 09:43:10 AM »
Will the democrats push Biden into the race and/or will there be a brokered convention?  Uncle al?? Anyone?

No, at this point Clinton is almost guaranteed the nomination. Sanders can win Iowa and New Hampshire, but that appears to be it. Clinton has a very commanding lead in just about every other primary. She will easily get enough delegates.

There is no push for Biden, certainly not for Gore. A brokered convention? Why? If Clinton has enough delegates, and the DNC wants her anyway, why would there be a brokered convention?

As far as orange jumpsuits, I'll believe it when I see it. We've heard this about Clinton a hundred times before. Some looming scandal is going to take her down. Never happens. Remember how the Benghazi hearings were supposed to be some kind of bombshell? Nobody cared. The House Republicans care about this stuff way more than the general public does.

The question isn't whether Sanders can get the nomination, the question is whether Clinton can win nationally.

Clinton v Trump/Cruz, I think she strolls to the White House no problem. Clinton v Rubio, however, and I think she gets nervous.

This is the irony about this race. Despite the huge electoral vote advantage she has going into the race Clinton is a vulnerable candidate, especially in swing states. The Republicans may very well hand her the keys to the WH simply because they can't seem to nominate a reasonable candidate. Amazing what has happened to that party.

Job Search / Re: 2L Summer & Post-Grad Employment Search & Alternatives
« on: January 19, 2016, 09:28:00 AM »
First off, congratulations. Anything above 3.0 in law school is a respectable GPA.

Second, if you can provide a little background like where you are located, if you're willing to move, whether you have a minimum salary requirement, etc., then it's easier to answer your questions.

But generally, I think OCI is a mediocre (at best) option for most students. Unless you're an academic superstar you probably won't get hired from OCI. This means you've got to pound the pavement and hustle.

You mentioned that you have family finances, so I assume you have (or have had) a job before. Getting a legal job is not too drastically different from getting into any other competitive line of work. Sending out a million resumes to every open position will not be very useful. You need to make connections and utilize any connections you already have. If you have any specific marketable experience (whether from your previous job or during law school) try to match it up with a legal job.

You mentioned in-house and sports management positions, but you need to very flexible. In this market the ability to wear many hats and to be adaptable is key. 

Paid positions are going to be pretty tough to get at this point, but if you can afford to accept an unpaid position at a firm or government office I'd do it. The DA, PD, City Attorney and a multitude of state and federal agencies have unpaid interns. Even these are somewhat competitive, but it's imperative that you get some experience before graduation. Even if it's not a field that you're interested in or an office you'd never want to work at, you need something on your resume.

As far as another degree, I wouldn't even worry about that now. More debt, more time out of the job market, and I'm not even sure it would be all that useful. To land a job in law or sports management you need experience. If you have the experience then an MBA won't matter. If you don't have the experience then an MBA still won't matter.

Focus right now on finding a legal position, then focus on passing the bar, then focus on getting a job. 

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Score Theory
« on: January 07, 2016, 05:48:52 PM »
Prestige is important.  It attracts reliable clientele.  Nobody wants crummy clients.

No, it doesn't.

Most of your clients will have no clue where you went school, nor will they care. As far as most clients are concerned, Harvard and Arizona State are pretty much the same thing. They will come to you either via referral, because you have a good rep, or because you were the first name in the Yellow Pages. Not because of where you went to school.

At a big firm where the clients themselves might be Ivy League grads, there could be a preference for pedigrees among the clientele. But even so, I can tell you this: I worked at a firm with both Ivy League grads as well as lawyers who went to no-name schools, and I never once heard of a clent saying "No, I don't want that guy. I want a Harvard grad." Never happened. At a small firm or solo practice, even less so.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Score Theory
« on: January 07, 2016, 03:24:20 PM »
Now, do you need a 165+ to work at BigLaw? No. You don't. I've worked at BigLaw, and I know that they don't ask for your LSAT. That doesn't quite end the discussion, however. The most If you want to make the really, really big bucks, become a Plaintiff's Attorney. 33% (or whatever) of a bunch of settlements starts to add up.

If you graduate from a T14 with good grades (or a T5 with almost any grades), then yes, of course you will have a much better shot at high paying biglaw jobs as opposed to the average graduate of Unknown State U. This is stating the obvious.

Loki's quote above, however, is something that most 0Ls are clueless about. The wealthiest attorneys I've met are guys who learned a particular field of law very well, like consumer class action suits, and struck out on their own. They make the kind of money that would make a biglaw partner tear up. I know a very unassuming divorce lawyer with a small, low key office and a stellar reputation. That guy is a multimillionaire.

The point is that you are unlikely to get wealthy (I mean truly wealthy, not just well off) working for someone else. In law, business, whatever, people can get a good salary working for someone else. They usually don't get rich until they find a way to work for themselves.

Does that mean that you can't get rich as a biglaw partner? Of course not! But, as Loki pointed out, it is unlikely that a newly hired associate will stick around long enough to make partner.

Law School Admissions / Re: LSAC is confusing
« on: January 07, 2016, 03:02:16 PM »
This is easy, just call LSAC and ask what's up. They may simply mailed it a little late.

As far as the law school waiting until they have your next LSAT score, Citylaw is correct. It has to do with scholarships and (possibly) admission. If your numbers are already sufficient for that particular school, but you plan on re-taking anyway, they just want to see what you end up with. If you get a higher score, they may increase the scholarship offer. Don't worry about it. 

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Is Kaplan's course worth it?? PLEASE HELP!
« on: January 06, 2016, 08:28:10 PM »
I took Kaplan and found it to be sufficient. Not awesome, but definitely helpful. For me, the classes were okay, but what I really liked was the Kaplan study center.

They had one nearby, and I was able to spend all day studying in relative peace and quiet (as opposed to the college or public library). They also have tons of old LSATs that you can take and get immediately graded with a breakdown on your strengths and weaknesses. Also, there was always at least one LSAT instructor available as well as the other students, so you could always get feedback.

I know a lot of people don't like Kaplan, but I found it useful. My score went up quite a bit from my diagnostic, which I think was 154. Specifically, I found Kaplan to be helpful with reading comp. I don't think I would have figured out the best approach to that on my own.

Anyway, your mileage may vary.

Law School Admissions / Re: C&F Question
« on: January 04, 2016, 06:55:35 PM »
Check with your state bar and see what they require. Just remember: when in doubt, disclose. The bar can be forgiving of many things, but if they think you're being dishonest you're in trouble.

You will almost certainly need to disclose on the bar app, not sure about the others. Maybe.

You will probably have to send in an addendum to the bar app, and it may hold things up. They may ask follow up questions. Again, as long as you are completely honest I doubt that this will be a serious problem. People get admitted with far bigger issues.

Contact the NC state bar and get the info straight from the horse's mouth, don't rely on anyone on the interwebs to provide more than casual commentary. Good luck, I think you'll be fine!

Law School Admissions / Re: C&F Question
« on: January 04, 2016, 04:33:36 PM »
I don't what state you're in (the rules vary), but this sounds like a VERY minor issue. The main thing with the C&F is to disclose everything up front: the good, the bad and the ugly.

For the most part, the bar is looking for major red flags: arrests, academic discipline, expulsions, that type of thing. Even those issues might not be a barrier as log as the applicant is completely honest. Be sure to check with your specific state bar, but as long as you are honest about it and fully disclose, I doubt if it will be an issue.

Current Law Students / Re: Use of a mall as a public place for protests
« on: December 29, 2015, 09:06:11 PM »
In my experience, trial court judges follow the law 99% of the time. They usually lay down entirely predictable opinions, even when you really hope that they'll stretch it just a little bit in your favor. Nobody likes to get reversed on appeal.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 97