Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - AspenLizzy

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36]
Studying for the LSAT / Re: games-conditional rules question
« on: May 01, 2006, 03:38:47 AM »
The P stands alone... L is already there.  I think you may be making an incorrect reversal of R on thrus ----> L on mon.

Hi all.  I'm new to this borad hoping to get some feedback on a question I wrote.  I am trying to understand justify the conclusion questions and in my quest I have decided to take on the persona of a lsac writer.  Please let me know what you think.

All people like bears.  Bears are cuddly and cute. 
If you don't like bears You are heartless.

The conclusion of the argument follows logically if
which one of the following is assumed?

A) People are heartless if they don't like bears.
B) If you like bears then you are a person.
C) Heartless people sometimes like things that
   are cuddly and cute.
D) No people are hearless.
E) If you are not a bear then you are not cuddly and cute.

Also, if you are so inclined please leave feedback on why or why not this is a valid question and why the answers you did not choose are incorrect.  I'm studing on my own so all feedback is greatly appreciated.

The answer (i think) is the 11th letter from the left


Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36]