Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Miami88

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 18
Acceptances / Re: Hamilton at CLS vs. SLS vs. HLS
« on: February 03, 2014, 12:18:26 PM »
1) Any one of these would be amazing.

2) Everything equal... If you absolutely KNOW you want to live/work in California, and in the Bay area in specific, go to stanford. If its New York, then Columbia. If you aren't committed to anywhere but want the most universal pull, Harvard.

3) That is, of course, assuming all is equal... all may not be equal. Check out the course offerings, professor backgrounds, and relative rankings as related to public interest. Also look up law firms/organizations that specialize in public interest - where did those lawyers go to school? Where are those organizations located?

4) The largest factor that may sway a decision is $$. You may have to double check, but I'm almost certain Stanford and Harvard do not negotiate scholarships (neither does Yale). This is simply because they do not offer merit scholarship, but rather need-based scholarships. These scholarships are based on how your specific level of need matches up to the rest of the class, and then divided amongst the funds. Now, if there is a very significant discrepancy (ie. Harvard offers you 75k while Stanford doesnt offer you anything), then you may want to contact the respective fin. aid offices. Other than that, it is what it is. You may be able to negotiate more with Columbia though.

4) Another factor is loan-repayment and, more importantly, loan-forgivenness programs. Harvard has an amazing loan-forgiveness program. So long as you are working in a legal position, they will help you out significantly. Stanford has a similar program, however, is limited to positions related to public interest (yay!). These are all great safety nets. I'm not sure if Columbia has a similar program. Note that these programs are significant as they are essentially guaranteed "scholarships" in the future and should factor into your calculations side by side Columbia's scholarship offer.

5) My speculation is that Harvard may offer the strongest outcomes for you, followed by Stanford, and then Columbia. At this point, however, you just have to wait and see where the $$ falls.

Good luck and congratulations!

Law School Applications / Re: Addendum
« on: January 31, 2014, 10:18:50 AM »
I would. Just be succinct and factual. Highlight specific strengths, upward grade trend, etc.

Good luck.

Law School Applications / Re: Need help with ECs
« on: January 12, 2014, 01:06:56 AM »
Sure? Theres not really a way to answer this... There is no pre-requiste, cookie cutter path for applicants to follow in order to get into a particular school. Further, regardless of whether you have "enough" ECs - you should only do another EC if you were to do it regardless of applying to law school.

If you want more info on what adcomms are looking for, read the various blogs and what not that they have up. They explain (to great extent) of what they like and, more importantly, what they don't. Yale has a great one - the advice offered seems, for the most part, pretty universal to the admissions in law school.

and this as well...

Good luck!

Law School Applications / Re: Need help with ECs
« on: January 12, 2014, 12:05:40 AM »
I would only do extra-curriculars that you really want to do - otherwise, it will more than likely look pretty obvious that you are only doing them to wow the adcomms. The admissions reps want intelligent, passionate, interesting people in their law schools. The specifics do not really matter.

My recommendation is to invest the bulk of your free time not in trite ECs, but in LSAT prep. Stronger LSAT scores > unauthentic ECs. If you have more time left over, do ECs that you really enjoy (or something at least related to what you truly enjoy). If you are still in school, also make sure to get the strongest grades as you can (again, in whatever courses interest you the most).

The bulk of a decision will be based on your LSAT and GPA. Soft factors, like ECs, major, background, etc., will add to your file, but not make it.

Good luck!!!

Law School Applications / Re: Late Cycle Consequences
« on: January 10, 2014, 12:55:02 AM »
Not sure - you could go through of last year's cycle. Look up people that applied to the school you want, at similar times, and with similar numbers/backgrounds. Generally, applying later in the cycle would most affect borderline applicants. In other words, people with lsat/gpas far over a school's 75% (i.e. auto admits) are probably going to get in no matter when they apply. The opposite is true for auto denies. If you are in the middle, and on the lower end, then there may be fewer spots for you. You will be competing against a larger pool of applicants for less open slots. Its not inherently bad, just more difficult.

Good luck!

1) If you get a 173+, you certainly will have a shot at several top 14 schools, even with a 3.37 GPA. Check out for more specifics. Your soft factors will certainly play up your application.

2) Although you may have rocked those practice tests, understand that the strong majority of LSATers will score under their practice test scores. I'm not saying its impossible for you to score in the range you want, but it will be harder than you think. My best advice is to quickly review a test prep book(s)  like Kaplan or Powerscore.. then take every single PT under exact test conditions until test day.

3) The difference between a 3.37 and 3.4 is exceptionally nominal. I think your time would be better served trying to get about 3 points on your LSAT or even writing stronger essays. Now, if you can get a 3.5 or 3.6, then thats another issue, but three one-hundredth of a decimal point is not all that alluring. On top of that fact that you will HAVE to get perfect scores in those classes. Which, based on your current record, may be harder than you think unless you take throw away easy classes. On top of the fact that you will have to explain to Columbia why you postponed graduation to take basketweaving to bump your GPA... Just my thoughts.

4) Although law schools really like seeing people overcome hurdles, be them external or self imposed, they also want assurance that the hurdle is FAR behind the student. My only concern with the drug issue is time. Although nine months is certainly very commendable, it is not in the same ball park as saying you have been ten years sober. If you are going to discuss your drug problem, then, you have to have several other hard pieces of evidence to substantiate your claim that it is really behind you and you have grown because of it. Have your grades improved drastically since you became sober (i.e. straight Ds and Fs to now straight As and Bs)? Finally, placement will be key. Although addendums are exactly what this kind of thing is for, you may decide that having a short paragraph in your personal statement is easier to acheive the above. You will be able to keep what you say more broad/vague, add luster to your personal statement, and still get the benefit of talking about a personal hurdle you overcame. Just a thought.

5) Finally, apply to more schools that just the top 14. Although there are certain perks in the top 14, it is not exclusive to them. If you know where you would want to live/work, apply to all the top full time and part time schools in that region. If you have a specific area of specialization you want to pursue (i.e. intellectual property), apply to all the top schools for that, even if the schools aren;t in the top 14. Not only will this give you more options, if you end up scoring as high as you hope, you will be able to snag strong scholarships (i.e. full rides). You may then be able to use those scholarships to negotiate for money at schools you would really like to attend (even some in the T14).

Good luck!!!

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Terrible Dec LSAT Score, Need Advice
« on: January 03, 2014, 09:18:03 PM »
It depends on a few things.

1) Your next score. If you get a 140 - then you are in deep. If you get a 175, you are doing amazing.

2) The school. Some schools will average all scores together. This is particularly stinky if you get a really high score. The good news is, however, that most schools don't do this - rather, they will either take the higher score and ignore the others or look at all scores together holistically.

3) Presentation. The last thing that will affect how a school interprets your score is how you present it to them. The majority of schools will already be asking for an addendum if you have multiple scores. This essay will be key. Be honest... but present yourself in the strongest and most positive light.

Overall, a higher second score will put you in a better spot than where you currently are...

Now... whether you should take the test again is another issue. At a 144, you have quite a bit of room to improve upon, which is good. However, if there really wasn't much you could have done better, than it may be a waste of your time to study and retake. If you were sick, didn't study properly, etc., then it may be worth it.

Good luck!

Where should I go next fall? / Re: South Florida law schools
« on: December 29, 2013, 02:50:34 PM »
Gotcha. Vibe is huge in decisions like these. Well, it looks like you will have a difficult decision ahead of you, but thats certainly a good problem to have. :)

Where should I go next fall? / Re: South Florida law schools
« on: December 29, 2013, 12:25:34 PM »
Did you ever negotiate with FIU? I'm sure if St. Thomas and Nova offered you $$, you can get something from FIU. That, plus the fact that FIU is so cheap for Florida Residents, would make it pretty enticing.

Good luck! :)

I would of course double check - but from my understanding...

1) If I do submit the application minus the transcript will Loyola or American still receive the transcript automatically (from LSAC)?

Yes, as soon as LSAC processes it, they will send it over.

2) Also, will my application still be considered without the transcript?

No. Schools will only review a complete application. Note that this means slightly different things to different schools, like the number of LORs and what not, but usually the LSAT and transcripts are mandatory for completion. The schools will process any information they receive, but they won't review it for a specific decision until it is complete.

Good luck!

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 18