« on: April 02, 2015, 10:51:37 PM »
I was going to concur with Maintain. My only added notes-
Watch out... Scalia in the house!!!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
For all you know we are all using the same screen name and hired by Law School Discussion to disagree to generate content.
But no, I'm not the Dean of Harvard Law School.
2. I think that UPenn should be a slamdunk decision. But it is still a risk-reward scenario. I have had friends who can't hack BigLaw. Who burn out after one or two years (which can be a lot of due diligence / doc review type tasks, depending on your litigation/transactional slant). It's said that the law is a lot like a pie eating contest, where the prize is that you get to eat more pie. Go to UPenn, and you will have a career, but you'll need to plan around that debt (with the benefit being that UPenn is one of the very few schools that graduates people to jobs that can take care of the debt). OTOH, go to another school *and you may never have that BigLaw job or clerkship you dream of*. But if you find out that what you really wanted was to be a public defender, or some other job that doesn't provide great remuneration, then you have a very manageable debt load. Of course, there's the possibility you can't find a job if you don't do well (something that is exceedingly unlikely if you go to UPenn).
But if I were in your shoes, I would go to UPenn.