Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Miami88

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16
Minority Topics / How minorities work....
« on: July 20, 2011, 05:32:36 PM »
Hi guys,

So I have two different hispanic backgrounds - does this affect how law schools will view the URM?


Studying for the LSAT / Re: Practice Test Score 145
« on: July 19, 2011, 12:32:31 PM »
Think of it like this...

In music school they say off the bat you MUST be practicing at least 21 hours a week - which matches up with your 3 hours a day. This, however, is a long term plan (for 4 years of practice). If you have a year + to study for the LSAT, 21 hours a week shouldn't be all that bad. I have personally found 4-6 hours a day to be ideal for my improvement. If you are trying to get into the high 160s within 3 months - try 30+ hours a week. My goal is the low 170s - which may take 6 months+ at 30 hours a week for me.

If you are serious about the LSAT and law school, structure you day so that you can squeeze in as much efficient LSAT study as possible. Even on days you can't get a whole lot in still keep your mind on LSAT. Read through sections you have done, review methodology - question types, etc. Read online resources about the LSAT, like this forum. Keeping your mind on the LSAT is just as important as studying for it. A day shouldn't go by without you at least looking at something LSAT related.

One more thing - taking the diagnostic test is fine but make sure from here on out you focus only under un-timed conditions. Once you have a firm grasp of fundamentals (once you can answer all the questions correctly un-timed) then move on to timed tests. Why? If you can't answer the questions un-timed - theres no way you will be able to answer them timed. Once you can score in the 175+ range on an un-timed test - then move on to time management. Make sure that you are learning an efficient method (which all of the major prep companies have) so you can bring your time down when it is relevant. You will also notice, however, that once you have a firm grasp on fundamentals, timing should become less of an issue. Remember, its not speed but efficiency.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT Study Group/Question
« on: July 18, 2011, 04:19:57 PM »
Thats a good point. The numbers posted by individuals tend to vary in accuracy - a lot of them even say up front that they are not that accurate. It should then be used as a rough guide (it seems like the majority of stuff posted by individuals are legitimate though).

That being said, there is a page for each school that lists their avg. ranges and what not. These tend to be pretty accurate as all the ones I have seen are the exact same thing as the information posted on university websites. I, of course, would start with the university's websites first - then move to sites like these.

Another site is ... this is a calculator straight from LSAC (creators of LSAT) who use information directly from Universities.

Hope that helps.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: RC Question
« on: July 07, 2011, 12:59:26 PM »
This business about the "best" answer is nonsense.  The right answers are right (they are supported by the passage AND answer the question asked) and the wrong answers are wrong (they are either not supported by the passage or they don't answer the question asked).  The writers never give you two right answers where one is subjectively "better" than the other.

That being said, the ONLY questions on which I would skip reading all the answer choices are Must be True questions in the Games section.

After more practice I definitely understand the why the "best" answer concept is off - it truely is either right or wrong. That being said - why do you only skip Must Be True LG questions? What about Inference LR questions (sometimes presented as Must be True)? I'm sure there are other question types that warrant finding the answer and moving on?

This concept seems to be left out of discussion in most of my study material (Princeton Review and Kaplan). In the explanations they often say something like: "B) This is the correct answer because of _____ - move on to the next question. But for study purposes lets look at why the other answers are wrong." The majority of the times they don't say that - but when they do its not really clear why?

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Logic games books
« on: July 03, 2011, 09:19:51 AM »
I'm liking the Kaplan book - but I'm not sure how it stacks up against others. I started the Kaplan book getting about 90% accuracy in about 15-20 min per game. I am half way through the book and am now at 100% accuracy at about 10-11 min. per game. I'm probably gonna be buying the McGraw and PowerScore books after I finish Kaplan.

If you do pick multiple books - make sure not to get confused with your methodology. In the end you should pick one way to do each step/game type/question type - if that means combining different tech. thats fine, just as long as it works .

Good luck

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Strengthen/Weaken LR Help
« on: July 01, 2011, 01:14:59 PM »
General questions like this are hard to answer, because its tough to know what you're not understanding.  Post some questions (PT#, Section#, and Question#) that have you stumped.

I understand why they are right and wrong - after the fact.

This lead me to figure out where the error is occurring and I have pin pointed it. I am actually doing great in preparation for questions (understanding conclusions, evidence, assumption, scope, formal logic, keywords etc.) and most of my predictions are dead on with the correct answer choices - and all of this is done within efficient times. It seems, however, the answers themselves are messing with me. For some reason I can't see through the awkward language. When I do I get really excited because it sticks out immensely from the rest, but if not I begin to tread.

I have noticed this now in my Reading Comprehension section as well. I understand everything just fine until I begin reading the answers - even when I have the exact prediction of the correct answer, I often don't see it. This, then, seems to be a major issue I am having with all questions.

Any advice? Here are examples of the above issue. I know exactly why they are wrong but maybe there are common "wrong answers" that I am falling for that I just don't see?

PT 27, Sec 3, Q 24 - Answered A instead of E
PT 24, Sec 3, Q 9 - Answered B instead of E
PT 35, Sec 1, Q 4 - Answered D instead of C
PT 24, Sec 3, Q 22 - Answered D instead of C
PT 36, Sec 3 Q2 - Answered C instead of A
PT 17, Sec 3, Q 12 - Answered B instead of D

By the way, thank you so much EarCat - so far you have really helped!

Studying for the LSAT / Re: 156 LSAT - School Questions!
« on: June 30, 2011, 09:04:10 PM »
It seems like your GPA is perfect for FSU. Your LSAT score seems a little low, but not impossible. Strong soft factors may ease a few points off of the LSAT - but not much.

It seems that people only recommend retaking the test if you feel like your score was either nowhere near your actual score OR you can score much higher. The median LSAT score for FSU is 159 (the range is 158-161). Worst case scenario a school will average your LSAT scores. So you will have to score a 162 or better on your next LSAT to make it into their median. Best case scenario is a school takes the top score, or adds more weight to top score (though I wouldn't always count on it) and so a 160s score would be awesome. If you can get your LSAT score into the mid/low 160s or higher I would def. retake it. If not, work your butt off on the soft factors (personal statement, letters of recommendation, etc.) and apply anyways. Add an addendum explaining why your score may have been lower that day - etc.

Throughout this process I would still keep LSAT on your mind and continue working on it to bring your score up. If you dont get accepted into places you want you can then retake it and apply for the next cycle - again, presuming you bring your score up into the 160s. This may also give you more time to buff up your soft factors/resume.

The above has been my take on what the avg. person would say - maybe someone else has more specifics?

Good Luck!

Studying for the LSAT / Strengthen/Weaken LR Help
« on: June 29, 2011, 02:59:44 PM »
Hi guys,

So far I am doing pretty well in the LR section getting about 80-90% accuracy at about 1:45 per question (just started studying, of course I want to get that to 100% accuracy under 1:20).

I am noticing, however, a discrepancy with my Strengthen/Weaken questions. Its taking me twice as long to get through these questions and I am averaging about 30-50% accuracy. Any tips on finding the right answer?

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Study strategy and mindset for the LSAT?
« on: June 27, 2011, 02:01:31 PM »

I started studying for the LSAT about 4 weeks ago. The first two weeks I used the PR book and then about 2 weeks ago I started the Kaplan books.

I personally have noticed that I do much better when there is a clear and distinct methodical approach that is general enough to tackle any LSAT question within the given section/question type parameter.

This being said, it seems that the Kaplan books offer much more of this "methodical" approach than the PR book (it sorta lets you figure it out for yourself.)

So the short answer: methodical approach that works every time.

Also, its so important to build - again, something that the PR book wasn't the best at. Just like a math class I like techniques to build on each other. You have to master level 1 before you master level 2 of the "methodical approach." Then when you get to level 4 you are still practicing level 1, 2 and 3. This way you do not need to re-read major sections or figure things out for yourself.

Once you have the method down in the student, then apply it to efficiency - how to get time down.

Finally, include a practice section with tips on how to self analyze (again, a method would help).

I hope that helps?

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16