Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - loki13

Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 60
261
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Is ANYONE moderating this site?
« on: May 14, 2015, 01:12:12 PM »
I've done that.

As an FYI, you can't group report (if you try to report multiple spammers at one time, you get locked out). I haven't noticed that anything is done when a report is made. And it would be a lot easier if a mod simply swept through periodically- which was done recently.

*shrug* Dealing with spammers is like laundry; it's periodic maintenance.

262
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Is ANYONE moderating this site?
« on: May 13, 2015, 03:30:45 PM »
Evidence says no. And I don't think there's anyway to contact anyone.

263
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 11:54:49 AM »
opal,

At this point, I know you're looking for specificity, but I have to be general. You need to look at the terms of your medical leave of absence/medical withdrawal/whatever it was called. Did you have specific terms written down? Was it pursuant to an official policy? Were there verbal terms offered by a decision maker that you know of and can reference? Or was it a general understanding? Make sure you understand that, and comply (to the best of your ability) with any terms. Include references to said terms in your petition for readmission to show your compliance.

At this point, just make sure you're taking care of yourself, and documenting. It doesn't pay to think "three chess moves ahead." Legal options should be a last resort.* Again, if there is someone at the school that you can speak candidly with, and informally with, regarding your desire to re-enroll so that you can visit at another school, that might be a good thing. I am somewhat concerned that you'd look to have your parents have that conversation; while I know that these past experiences have been exceptionally difficult for you, the school's administration would probably feel better seeing that you can discuss these issues. 

Good luck.

*Remember that filing a lawsuit means depositions, discovery, litigation costs, etc. Not to mention time and stress. My advice as an attorney, when talking to friends, is always to avoid litigation whenever possible. It's a fun job, but a terrible life, if you know what I mean.

264
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 10:57:16 AM »
opal,

That's great info! Visiting student status is very different than a "pure" transfer. One of my good friends did that back in law school (he did his first two years with me on the East Coast, then went to Loyola-LA law as a visiting student for his third year) and it's definitely doable, but fairly rare. That said, it may be something your current school administration would be amenable to, given both your needs (continued stability, etc.) and, perhaps, their needs.

I think you will need to start with a conversation with your current school's administration (some type of Dean of Student, etc., whoever you feel comfortable talking to). It is my general understanding that you would need to be "enrolled" at your current institution (cleared) before you can visit another for your third year. Remember, though, that the administration, despite whatever disagreements you might have had with them, has an interest in your success as well, if for no other reasons than to keep their numbers up.

Good luck!

265
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 10:07:11 AM »
opal,

Thank you for the clarification! It's certainly better that it was just a school sanction.

Regarding the transfer- eh.... too many factors to consider. Your timeline makes it look like you started in 2013, and didn't quite finish your first semester of your second year. So it would be a decent option just based on time. But you- 1) have disciplinary issues at your prior school, and 2) I would assume that the same issue you had might have prevented you from being at the top of your class?

You can always try. On the plus side, enrollment numbers are way down, so if you're paying full freight somewhere, you might have more of a shot.

266
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 09:27:03 AM »
opal,

I stated that you need to make sure you have been candid in the past. If you were, then no problem.

Again, every state is different. If there are no "red flags," then most applications, in most states, tend to sail through. Yours--- won't. You have a *recent* stay order against you, as well as disciplinary action against you in law school. For these reasons, it is incredibly likely that the Bar will go through your past more thoroughly.

I added that note as a caution, as I have experience dealing with attorneys seeking admission in a different jurisdiction that have similar issues. It is rare for someone to have issues with mental illness or substance abuse as serious as yours that have caused no problems at all, and then suddenly cause such serious problems in law school. But it does happen. More often, however, they had sporadic issues prior to that, there was a question on the law school application that could have been answered one of two ways (let's say... completely candidly, or a little less candidly), and they chose less candidly. It's no big deal if they amend prior to the process (assuming it's something small).

If this doesn't apply to you, ignore it. And I will reiterate that mental illness, alone, will not be a reason to deny you the license.

267
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 09:01:07 AM »
opal,

I am not familiar with Pennsylvania. I will assume that you're planning on practicing in the state where you are re-enrolling in law school. Pennsylvania, I believe, is one of the few states that does not specifically ask about mental illness, but does have a catch-all question. In addition, it will be extremely difficult to explain the recent issues you had in law school and the order against you without full disclosure.

At this point, everything you are doing is correct. If your question is a general, "I screwed up, I have been diagnosed as bipolar, can I pass?" then my answer to you is a qualified yes.  (That's going to be a common answer you can give as a practitioner!). Mental illness, alone, will not disqualify you from any Bar so long as you show evidence that you acknowledge the problem, you are treating it, and it will not impact your ability to practice law while treated (which is a little bit of a higher bar than not a danger to yourself or others!).

However, you should be aware that your illness, *combined with your recent conduct in law school* will raise a red flag, and the bar will be reviewing your application very thoroughly. Make sure you have been candid in the past- including your original law school application (and make sure you amend, if necessary). The exact facts and issues are going to be a little complex, and I don't know that you want to get too detailed on a public forum on the internet, so I will repeat my advice to you- talk to an individual familiar with the process in Pennsylvania, confidentially. Clear the first hurdle (get back in school!) and worry about the Bar after after that. Nothing you've written will automatically disqualify you, so long as you remain candid.

268
Current Law Students / Re: Disciplinary Action in Law School--C&F?
« on: May 07, 2015, 07:10:49 AM »
opal,

There's a lot to unpack here. So let me start with the basics- you failed to provide one crucial piece of information. What state? Every state has a different bar. Some states' bars are notorious for the C&F (sometimes called moral character and fitness) determinations, some states are a little more lax. So that would help.

Next, your question is whether this will impact the determination. That's easy- yes, it will. It will impact it. The type of impact it will have is the interesting question.

Then there's the issue of re-enrolling. Here's the thing- when you re-enroll, you have to be 150% honest. Go above and beyond. Disclose everything to the law school. Why? Because what kills people with "issues" isn't just the issue, it's the candor. The bar loves that word. They don't like to screw you on the actual issues (for reasons we will discuss shortly), but they will nail you every time if you haven't been candid. Partly it's because you are required to be candid as an attorney. Partly it's because that's one area where the bar can restrict membership easily, and if you've lied or failed to disclose on a law school admission, they can go after you for that.

Now, you'll have to divide the issues into two areas- the legal issues, and the medical issues. While you present them as intertwined, and they are, they present slightly different issues. The legal issues (the stay order, the campus sanctions) are the type of issues that, but for your illness, you'd have to otherwise explain away. The mental illness issue, properly treated, also would not be enough to deny you admission.

But the mental illness issue is further complicated. IIRC, in the last few years, several state bars have come under fire because denying someone solely based on a mental illness may be considered a violation of the ADA. But this is an evolving area of the law.

Arggh... so what does this all mean?
1. Many states have some type of lawyer assistance for attorneys and/or law students who have struggled with mental illness or substance abuse. See if your state has one and contact them. They may be able to help you.
2. Be candid.
3. Be healthy!!!!!!
4. Talk to someone informally in your state who is a practitioner about your issues; maybe a professor at the law school could point you in the right direction (a PR prof?)? You may want to contact an attorney who specializes in bar admissions issues.

I don't want to write any of this to discourage you. Many attorneys have struggled with substance abuse and mental illness, and have not only been accepted by their state bar, but have successful practices. Just make sure you protect yourself.

269
Choosing the Right Law School / Re: Arizona Law
« on: May 07, 2015, 06:54:30 AM »
abdre,

I agree with what CityLaw wrote. A few additions. I personally think that lawschooltransparency.com has good stats for job placement from the NALP database in easily accessible numbers. Go to the main page and look under the tab "What We Do" and then NALP Report Database- it's sorted by school.

But this is relatively simple. Once you get past the very top schools, and you avoid the very bottom schools, it doesn't matter a great deal. All that should matter is cost and location. Personally, I would put cost first (assuming location is acceptable). You might want to check those NALP reports I mentioned and see the geographic locations that those schools place their grads at- U Ariz. places 63% of their grads in Arizona. The next biggest state, unsurprisingly, is California... at 5%. That said, if you want to practice in Arizona, that is a great school. Seriously. But if you don't want to live in Arizona, if you don't want to practice there, don't go there.

More so than almost any other profession, where you go to law school will have a giant impact on where you want to practice (outside of the T14). It isn't necessarily your destiny- for example, I went to random state law school on the East Coast, and I first practiced in California. But for most people, it is.

Cost (minimize) and location (where you want to practice). Don't overthink. No one cares if you went to the #32 school or the #62 school.

270
lawguy,

I think it would help to understand your objective? For example, different states have different weights (heh). So you can score really high on the MBE and make up for a low score on a different part of the exam. But I assumed your question was different (iow, I've already passed the bar somewhere else, can I waive in elsewhere).

What is it that you want/are looking for? Most people have some restriction on where they will live/will practice (jobs, families, houses, networks, etc.), so it's not like you can just say, "I will choose to practice in the state where I think I have the best shot at passing the bar, and/or the requirements seem the least onerous."

IMO, most states don't have very hard portions on their state bar. I've past two bars that are widely considered two of the toughest bars in the nation (and neither with reciprocity!) and it wasn't that hard. But if you're just looking for easy, it's my understanding that South Dakota isn't too rough.

Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 60