Hey, we all had to get an undergrad degree.
I just remembered another LR question. I don't remember the specifics (kind of like I didn't remember the specifics of the rodent question, which ended up leading to debate), but it had something to do with Poetry and Novels, and how people in the 17th century have their own private writing rooms but aren't rich enough to afford the education necessary to learn techniques for poetry or something. I'm 100% sure this is a question.
The rodent answer I chose said that: the figures that the Eurpoean government cited cannot be the result of the elimination alone.
The stimulus stated: In order to deal with the rodent popoulation, the European gove developed a new plan that got rid of 90% of the rodent popoulation (according to them). But Europe is known to have harsh winters that the rodents most likely can't survive.
I don't remember it being a weaken/strenthen question. More like a what can be logically concluded question
I don't remember the letter but I'm almost positive the answer had to do with seedlings not growing where there were mature tree. It was somewhere in the middle of the pack of answer choices; I'm pretty sure it wasn't E. Maybe B or C?