Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - WannabeLAW

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: I Give Up
« on: February 05, 2006, 03:51:18 PM »
Hey, we all had to get an undergrad degree.

Studying for the LSAT / I Give Up
« on: February 05, 2006, 03:40:27 PM »
Someone tell me when the scores are in. I just want a 160 (LSAT fairy, grant me that wish!). Until then I have to get ready for the Fundamentals in Engineering Exam in April (it's 8 hours long). Oh, I've also got an engineering design project. I'll see y'all around. Bye.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: My Expert Opinion: The LSAT Indicates Nothing
« on: February 05, 2006, 03:11:46 PM »
"indicates nothing" is way too strong. Admit it, this is an almost impossible stance to defend.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 05, 2006, 01:01:31 PM »
One more for the post mortem. I think my score got bumped up to a 122. Woohoo!!   ;D

Studying for the LSAT / Re: logic games question
« on: February 05, 2006, 12:56:04 PM »
(C): 3rd floor. Confirmed in the post mortem

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 05, 2006, 12:51:07 PM »
I just remembered another LR question.  I don't remember the specifics (kind of like I didn't remember the specifics of the rodent question, which ended up leading to debate), but it had something to do with Poetry and Novels, and how people in the 17th century have their own private writing rooms but aren't rich enough to afford the education necessary to learn techniques for poetry or something. I'm 100% sure this is a question.

If it's not experimental then it's a valid question. I had an exp. LR and I can't pinpoint the real-deal. Anyway, it asked which one would support the reason that women wrote poetry and not novels was not influenced by money(?)

The answer I chose was that women were refused entry to schools that taught how to write novels.(I think the stimulus said writing novels required formal education).
Other answers included : More men wrote poetry than women.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 05, 2006, 12:35:55 PM »
I'm sure the answer had to do with a cold weather. If it was a weaken question, it asked to weaken the government's claim that their plan killed 90% of the rodents.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« on: February 05, 2006, 12:12:18 PM »
The rodent answer I chose said that:  the figures that the Eurpoean government cited cannot be the result of the elimination alone.

The stimulus stated:  In order to deal with the rodent popoulation, the European gove developed a new plan that got rid of 90% of the rodent popoulation (according to them).  But Europe is known to have harsh winters that the rodents most likely can't survive. 

I don't remember it being a weaken/strenthen question.  More like a what can be logically concluded question

That's what I had since the government claim could have resulted from the exceptional cold winter that was observed. (passage said rodents fare poorly in cold weather).

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Mahogany LR question
« on: February 05, 2006, 12:07:00 PM »
I don't remember the letter but I'm almost positive the answer had to do with seedlings not growing where there were mature tree. It was somewhere in the middle of the pack of answer choices; I'm pretty sure it wasn't E. Maybe B or C?

Concur. The answer about not growing with mature mahogany supported the notion that loggers, who clear a group of trees would clear trees of the same age. If you negate the answer you'd see it would directly attack this premise. And it was not E.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post Mortem - February Writing Sample (Poll)
« on: February 05, 2006, 11:55:57 AM »
I thought this question was off the beaten path the LSAT questions usually take.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14