Plus he is gorgeous and has nice pants.
Messages - fortook
Then say T4s and don't single out Cooley. You seemed to be distorting the facts- intentionally to make a point. That's not kool.
Ofc, by your analysis the OP should go to Stanford or no where. Looks like his choices are only T4s. While Cooley is a bad choice hands down, there are T3s and T4s that place well- Maine for example.
You there OP? What is happening here? Who could possibly care about Cooley's internal rankings- I read them for comedic purposes, but ofc I didn't take it seriously. It actually hurts their case more than anything.
Does anyone, anyone here think the way to put down Cooley is by comparing it to a T14? Really?
How about the cold employment stats? How about the attrition rate? How about alum dissatisfaction? Bar passage rates? tuition? Grading curves? All, ofc, looked at independently and objectively- not compared to the 3rd most successful school in the country. Its a weak approach.
Lets come at this from another angle: Ask the question is Mitt Romney rich? Well that all depends on who he is compared to. Is he rich compared to you or me or 99.9999999% of people: yes. Is he rich compared to Bill Gates? Is he rich compared to Mark Zuckerburg?
He is rich, but I could distort that by comparing him to the super rich.
What you are doing is the inverse: Is a homeless guy poor? Yes, but why are you trying to show that by comparing a homeless guy to Bill Gates?