Plus he is gorgeous and has nice pants.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - fortook
Then say T4s and don't single out Cooley. You seemed to be distorting the facts- intentionally to make a point. That's not kool.
Ofc, by your analysis the OP should go to Stanford or no where. Looks like his choices are only T4s. While Cooley is a bad choice hands down, there are T3s and T4s that place well- Maine for example.
You there OP? What is happening here? Who could possibly care about Cooley's internal rankings- I read them for comedic purposes, but ofc I didn't take it seriously. It actually hurts their case more than anything.
Does anyone, anyone here think the way to put down Cooley is by comparing it to a T14? Really?
How about the cold employment stats? How about the attrition rate? How about alum dissatisfaction? Bar passage rates? tuition? Grading curves? All, ofc, looked at independently and objectively- not compared to the 3rd most successful school in the country. Its a weak approach.
Lets come at this from another angle: Ask the question is Mitt Romney rich? Well that all depends on who he is compared to. Is he rich compared to you or me or 99.9999999% of people: yes. Is he rich compared to Bill Gates? Is he rich compared to Mark Zuckerburg?
He is rich, but I could distort that by comparing him to the super rich.
What you are doing is the inverse: Is a homeless guy poor? Yes, but why are you trying to show that by comparing a homeless guy to Bill Gates?