This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Cicero
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5  7 8 9 10 11 ... 21
« on: July 26, 2010, 11:16:52 AM »
I don't think that he's saying that he's living off of dividends. If it really is dividends that's he's living on, then yeah he's full of poo. For example, I have some shares of a decent stock, and I get dividend checks every couple of months for a little under $2. It would take a lot of stock to make a decent living that way. I'm assuming that what SOP is saying is that he tries to buy stocks low and sell them when they are higher, which can earn significantly more money.
« on: July 24, 2010, 10:22:52 PM »
Sonofapickle, you dun goofed up! I back traced you and reported you to the cyber police! Seriously though, your post is pretty ridiculous (like the cyber police). Many T-3/4 grads are having trouble finding employment in the legal field, but most are not working at Chez McDo.
« on: July 24, 2010, 07:48:46 PM »
Umm...there are quite a few state schools in the top 50, such as UNC & UF, and they are both much cheaper than private schools.
« on: July 24, 2010, 01:25:22 AM »
Being a lawyer is a huge responsibility, and there should be some standardization. Law school teaches you more than how to pass the bar. The bar, while very difficult because it covers so many subjects, is supposed to be on a more basic level.
Which group of less fortunate people are you talking about? If you are talking about cost, there are some very inexpensive ABA approved law schools. There are also loans, which most of us take out in order to go to law school. If you are talking about LSAT scores, the minimum is comparable to what you will need to be able to go to graduate school (top 50-60%) and you can take the LSAT multiple times.
By the way, there are different types of pilots. A person who can fly a Cessna isn't necessarily qualified to be a commercial airline pilot or to fly a helicopter. The training is different for the different types of licenses just as the training at an online program would be somewhat different from an in-class JD. I'm not sure how an online program can effectively teach some of the things one learns in an in-class setting.
« on: July 23, 2010, 12:31:25 PM »
Wow! This thread is only 2 years old?! It has a bagillion posts and views. Most of the threads seem to be pretty dead, but this one appears to have taken on a life of its own.
« on: July 23, 2010, 01:28:18 AM »
I don't think it would hurt you or that they would see you as heartless. Based on what you wrote, it sounds like they'd think you were busy interning and researching. T-14 schools are a little different from a lot of the other schools, so maybe Morten Lund or Bike Pilot will chime in since they went to top schools.
« on: July 23, 2010, 01:24:52 AM »
If you can bring up your score 10-15 points, you should be able to get into quite a few T-4s. The minority status will help you some too. If you can't bring it up very much, you should consider applying to NCCU. NCCU specifically says that it is geared toward minority students and they tend to look past lower LSAT scores. They also happen to have really inexpensive tuition and offer both part-time & full-time options. Good luck on the LSAT!
« on: July 22, 2010, 11:47:18 PM »
Did you check the thing on LSAC saying you wanted schools to be able to see your info and contact you? I didn't allow it, so I never got any of that stuff. I know others who did get some e-mail from schools by allowing their info to be visible on LSAC. FCSL, for example, recruits people that way. They send them an e-mail telling them they are pre-accepted or something like that, and telling them that they just need to send in an application. However, I have also heard about schools that offer fee waivers and contact students to get them to apply to increase the number of students applying, so that they can reject a higher number of applicants and appear more competitive. Would you happen to be an extremely unusual minority? Or is there something extraordinary about you that W&M would know about? If not, I'm not sure why they are contacting you because they are aT30 LS and their 25%-75% LSAT is 161-166 and GPA is 3.42-3.77 (http://www.top-law-schools.com/rankings.html
). Honestly, I'm not sure what ABA LS you will be able to get into with your LSAT & GPA. Your LSAT score is more of a problem than your GPA. Have you considered retaking the LSAT?
« on: July 22, 2010, 03:31:38 PM »
There are good things about both programs. NCCU is a T-4, but it is really, really inexpensive. (I considered going there myself because of how cheap it is, but chose to go somewhere else instead.) Campbell, while T-4, is more respected than other T-4 schools in the state. It really depends on what you want to do when you graduate (such as if there is a specialty you want to focus on and 1 of those schools has a certificate in it) and how much debt you are willing to go into to be a JD. If you know some NC lawyers, maybe you could talk to them about how much of a difference going to Campbell will make and whether it is worth the extra expense.
« on: July 22, 2010, 10:19:03 AM »
What are the factors that most determine if you receive scholarship money? LSAT & GPA
Does your location, income, history affect it at all? no, unless you're a movie star or something--then it's possible it determine whether they offer one
Maybe I should clarify...I am thinking about just applying to Washburn U. for their Spring Start semester. I am wondering if I apply there and don't get the scholarship I need/want and withdraw the application, retake the LSAT and re-apply for the next fall cycle, will the original appliacation have any affect on the new application (In terms of acceptance and scholarship)?
They'll still have your old application on file when you reapply, and they will ask you if you have applied before. It would likely effect whether they accept you a second time, but I don't know from 1st hand experience. You could call the admissions office and find out.
What exactly makes an applicant 'under-represented'? Is it only race, or can it have to do with sex, veteran status, having a child, etc.?
pretty much race, though there may be some exceptions
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5  7 8 9 10 11 ... 21