This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Cicero
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16  18 19 20 21
« on: June 21, 2010, 12:36:27 AM »
Hell, even in civil procedere they tell you that if you want to take your next door neighbor to federal court on diversity you can laugh your way across state lines and sue the next day for that even though that is the only reason you moved and that very day. Its American, love it, learn it, deal with it.
umm, you have to establish a residence and show an intent to remain there indefinitely. You can do it the day before you file the lawsuit or go there for the "purpose of creating diversity" IF you can show those things. You can't really just waltz over to the next state and file without those other things. Well, I guess you could, but I would hope the opposing counsel would call BS on it.
« on: June 21, 2010, 12:06:43 AM »
You can check with the school, but it does generally take around 12 months (but some will go ahead and let you get it a month early or so (based on personal experience), but not much earlier than that). You will usually need to show that you have have ties to the state for that long by establishing a residence (generally cannot be on campus), getting a DL, getting a voter's registration & voting, paying taxes, etc.
« on: June 20, 2010, 09:02:18 PM »
I'm not sure what you are talking about with the ads because I don't see any on my screen. If there are ads then you can use adblock plus on firefox and you won't see them.
« on: June 20, 2010, 08:51:28 PM »
Just wanted to inject a dose of reality on this solo practitioner thing. In theory this might seem like a good idea if someone can't find a job, but there would be significant costs that don't exactly make it practical or feasible. I think it would be really hard for someone with $100K+ debt to secure the additional loan needed to afford such things as WestLaw/Nexis and/or law books, a building (because who is going to hire the lawyer that takes all their meetings at his/her apartment, parents' house, Starbucks, etc.), malpractice insurance, phone service, advertising...
« on: June 20, 2010, 08:00:34 PM »
The other thing you should consider is what you have to do to keep the scholarship. Many schools put a GPA requirement on the scholarship to make it harder for students to keep it. You should find out what the curve is at the school and the GPA that you must attain to keep it and decide whether you would want to stay at that school if you lose the scholarship.
« on: June 20, 2010, 07:14:59 AM »
Yes, you can, but my point is effective representation (because you actually know what you are doing) & the phasing out of the legal profession.
« on: June 19, 2010, 10:08:59 AM »
Not knocking Cooley, just saying the opinion that Cooley is the "best" is pretty subjective.
1. Cooley isn't the largest full-time program; it is the part-time program that is large. It may be the biggest based on the shear number of part-time students, but PT is non-traditional in determining the size of the school.
2. How do you define best? I would like to think a school that is "the best" would have a much, much better bar passage rate than nearly 1/3 flunking (unless they want to take MI bar--then they have a fair chance of passing). If you want to get out of MI, look to your right, now look to your left, and 1 of those classmates or you will fail the bar exam.
3. Umm, the cost is ridiculous for a full-time student without a scholarship...not the best combo--high debt and bad bar passage rate.
4. employment after 9 mo is below 90%...again, definitely not the best, even for a T-4.
5. average salary after graduation...ouch, paying it back will hurt and you may die of old age first...so, potentially living with a large never ending looming debt over your heard for you entire life may--not part of my definition of "the best".
Perhaps, despite the above, Cooley grads will take over the legal system, but they are going to have to watch out for the other waring factions (such as Concord, etc. if the ABA starts allowing online JDs to practice). Eventually a collapse will occur, after legal anarchy occurs. Alternatively, a collapse will occur because everyone will get their online JD and represent themselves. Ahhh! Legal apocalypse!
« on: June 18, 2010, 11:05:24 AM »
To FSU (accepts 60+) from a T-4 in that state and in close proximity.
« on: June 18, 2010, 01:29:50 AM »
To which school are you referring?
« on: June 17, 2010, 09:27:32 PM »
Well, based on my experience at my school, knowing what the professor wants has more to do with how they want you to format your answer--IRAC, flowing IRAC with MOR analysis (more essay style), lots of case names and explanations, or doesn't care whether you use cases. In my experience profs don't mind telling you which format they want. It helps them to tell you because they will have to grade 70+ exams, and would rather grade one structured the way they prefer. It doesn't seem to impact how much you need to know the law. Regardless of which one they want, you need to know the law really well, and you have to know how to apply it.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16  18 19 20 21