This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - llsatt1
« on: December 07, 2009, 10:12:21 PM »
that's a sweet improvement.
...........and honestly it was not as bad as I thought! Logic games were my weakest section where arguments and reasoning were my strongest. And low and behold my 5th experimental section was reasoning.
Not clear about what you mean by "5th experimental section". The experimental of any LSAT test falls within the first 3 sections. The 4th and 5th sections of the test automatically count.
But in order to understand an issue fully, it is essential to consider such evidence impartially.
I still think there's a gap there, which is where the answer choice/assumption comes in to play:
1. Understand issue fully -> consider all evidence impartially (that conflicts with your view)
2. conclusion: Take a strong position --> consider all evidence that conflicts with your view
#1 does not link to the conclusion without an assumption, which is the answer choice:
answer: anyone who does not understand the issue fully should avoid taking a strong position.
I'm confused with the wording of the question in that the reasoning conforms to the answer choice. I think it is really an assumption on which the conclusion depends.
18. Columnist: Taking a strong position on an issue makes one likely to misinterpret or ignore additional evidence that conflicts with one's stand. But in order to understand an issue fully, it is essential to consider such evidence impartially. Thus, it is best not to take a strong position on an issue unless one has already considered all important evidence conflicting with that position.
The columnist's reasoning most closely conforrms to which one of the following principles?
Answer: Anyone who does not understand an issue fully should avoid taking a strong position on it.