Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - llsatt1

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8
Studying for the LSAT / Earlcat = Irrx
« on: January 01, 2010, 08:25:43 PM »

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT experimental
« on: December 30, 2009, 07:17:49 PM »
The order varies from test taker to test taker.  The experimental is not in the same place for everyone.

thanks for clearing that up.

Studying for the LSAT / LSAT experimental
« on: December 29, 2009, 09:12:52 PM »

Law School Admissions / typing window abnormalities
« on: December 29, 2009, 01:12:26 PM »

Job Search / Re: Can't find a job? What about going solo?
« on: December 27, 2009, 03:04:23 PM »
Follow me as I make the transition from BigLaw to solo.  Feel free to comment away, I will answer you.

Hopefully, the blog will ease some of the fears that many have about going solo.  Join me.

you should really shave.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Role Question
« on: December 22, 2009, 01:12:04 PM »
Hi guys - for some reason I was stuck on this one problem

Because humans have evolved very little since the development of agriculture, it is clear that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods, consisting mainly of raw fruits and vegetables, nuts and seeds, lean meat and seafood. Straying from this diet has often resulted in chronic illness and other physical problems. Thus, the more our diets consists of wild foods, the healthier we will be.

The claim that "humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods" plays which one of the following roles...

C- it is a phenomenon for which the main conclusion of the nutritionist's arg. is cited as an explanation

- I thought this was the answer because "humans biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods" is a phenomenon (thing) and the main conclusion states that the more our diets consist of wild foods the healthier we will be (isnt this their explanation).

D - it is an intermediate conclusion for which one claim is offered as support and which is used in turn to support the argument's main conclusion
- for this answer choice I also see how this is correct

D ended up being the right answer.

The main conclusion doesn't support/explain the statement in the's the other way around.  Just look at the flow of the argument.  The main conclusion is the last senetence and everything before it supports it.  Answer D reflects the logical flow of the stimulus.

Law School Admissions / Viruses from this site
« on: December 22, 2009, 12:58:55 PM »

General Off-Topic Board / virus
« on: December 15, 2009, 06:25:25 PM »

Don't kid yourself, that is a very decent LSAT score. GPA could be higher but, barring and heinous criminal record, I'd say you have a decedent shot at the Top 30 too.

Studying for the LSAT / February LSAT
« on: December 12, 2009, 04:18:51 PM »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8