Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - compaq1984

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 29, 2009, 10:41:09 PM »
cool...thanx

12
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 29, 2009, 08:08:03 PM »
Mine too but supposedly they're released earlier...

13
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 29, 2009, 06:27:18 PM »
Whats the consensus about the ACTUAL date we will get our scores?
I had a friend who took his June '08 and he said he got his back about 4-5 days prior to the "LSAC date" that was listed... Anyone know?

 ???

14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Do I wait and take it in December? HELP!
« on: September 29, 2009, 03:43:50 PM »
Yes.. The 'LSD obsessed' is actually what you think it is... Her comments are frequent and useless. But they are funny sometimes...

julie see clear-thinking not your specialty.

Not at 4:16 am...
Whats your excuse?

15
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 29, 2009, 01:20:29 PM »
If I remember correctly, I think there were about 2-3 difficult Formal Logic inference questions on the last LR.  I don't specifically remember anything about bears or pythons but I do remember those being very time consuming... And alittle suprising..

16
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 28, 2009, 11:33:07 PM »

Hey Lionel, I would definitely file a complaint.  Who knows what they can really do at this point but it can't hurt and that ***hole should face some consequences.  That's ridiculous...

RC/LR/RC LG/LR

I had to cancel.  I felt decent about it except for the airplane LG.

The problem was my proctor.  During my first section, he kept telling me to bubble in my name, account number and all that other stuff WHILE i was working on my first section., meaning he already started the test.  I kept ignoring him but he kept interrupting me and eventually i gave up and bubbled the stuff in.  He made a few other people do the same thing.  I lost about 3-4 mins on that section, and because it was RC i didnt really have enough time to adequately complete and ready the last passage.

It really threw me off for the rest of the test.  I complained to the main guy and he told me to file a complaint with LSAC.  I'm pretty sure noting is going to happen to i just cancelled.

17
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Do I wait and take it in December? HELP!
« on: September 28, 2009, 03:16:39 AM »
Yes.. The 'LSD obsessed' is actually what you think it is... Her comments are frequent and useless.  But they are funny sometimes...

18
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 28, 2009, 03:13:53 AM »
I felt the last game in the LG was a pain... Seemed reasonable because the rules were formal logic but the questions were typical LSAC BS.... Lengthy stems and about 3 of them were 'CANNOT' or 'EXCEPT' questions.  Its definitely a very doable game but one that requires about 10+ minutes and I only had like 9 or so... Especially frustrating because the first 3 were slam dunks....   >:(

19
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 28, 2009, 12:22:58 AM »
Diggz, I was exactly the same way.  I felt panic rush over me when I noticed through the cover that RC was first.  I def. anticipated having 3 RCs....I HATE these sections.  I understand that having good reading skills is necessary for law school and practicing law but lets be serious.  Being able to "speed read" articles about ridiculous topics doesn't prove that you'll be better at making outlines or reading briefs (IMO)... Just that you can do them a little quicker... I think the questions in this section should be the same or less than those in LR/LG.  Plus, i was better at those sections anyways! Ha.  :P
For the logic games, I would assume (yes, this is a flawed assumption but @#!* it, I'm not in LSAT mode right now) it had to be likely that any one with 23 questions was the real one. I know it doesn't really apply since things change randomly, but in all my latest preptests (55,56,57), the logic games were only 23 questions long. And  the RC was usually 28. Seriously, wth. Why put the most questions on the part where you already have to read the most. Seems unnecessarily difficult.

Anyways. For the RC/LR/LR/LR/LG, I really hope that the second LR (Section 3) was the experimental. I'm just glad that one of those two was though since I did great on section 4.

I remember sitting with my LSAT testbook closed as they were reading the instructions and looking at the faint text through the front of the paper cover. At first I was like, "Yes, I think it is LR first" then I saw the faint outline of the line numbers for the paragraphs and said a little, "oh @#!* me." in my head.

My first thought after that was the chance  I might have two RC sections with one of them being experimental. :(

For me, my order of preference for what kind of experimental section I would have gotten would have been: 1.LG 2.LR 3.RC

20
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 27, 2009, 11:03:12 PM »
yes... i believe the test was 101 total...
RC- 27
LG- 23
LR- 25/26

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4