11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!
« on: September 29, 2009, 10:41:09 PM »
cool...thanx
Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion
Resources
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
11
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 29, 2009, 10:41:09 PM »
cool...thanx
12
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 29, 2009, 08:08:03 PM »
Mine too but supposedly they're released earlier...
13
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 29, 2009, 06:27:18 PM »
Whats the consensus about the ACTUAL date we will get our scores?
I had a friend who took his June '08 and he said he got his back about 4-5 days prior to the "LSAC date" that was listed... Anyone know? 
14
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Do I wait and take it in December? HELP!« on: September 29, 2009, 03:43:50 PM »Yes.. The 'LSD obsessed' is actually what you think it is... Her comments are frequent and useless. But they are funny sometimes... Not at 4:16 am... Whats your excuse? 15
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 29, 2009, 01:20:29 PM »
If I remember correctly, I think there were about 2-3 difficult Formal Logic inference questions on the last LR. I don't specifically remember anything about bears or pythons but I do remember those being very time consuming... And alittle suprising..
16
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 28, 2009, 11:33:07 PM »Hey Lionel, I would definitely file a complaint. Who knows what they can really do at this point but it can't hurt and that ***hole should face some consequences. That's ridiculous... RC/LR/RC LG/LR 17
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Do I wait and take it in December? HELP!« on: September 28, 2009, 03:16:39 AM »
Yes.. The 'LSD obsessed' is actually what you think it is... Her comments are frequent and useless. But they are funny sometimes...
18
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 28, 2009, 03:13:53 AM »
I felt the last game in the LG was a pain... Seemed reasonable because the rules were formal logic but the questions were typical LSAC BS.... Lengthy stems and about 3 of them were 'CANNOT' or 'EXCEPT' questions. Its definitely a very doable game but one that requires about 10+ minutes and I only had like 9 or so... Especially frustrating because the first 3 were slam dunks....
19
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 28, 2009, 12:22:58 AM »
Diggz, I was exactly the same way. I felt panic rush over me when I noticed through the cover that RC was first. I def. anticipated having 3 RCs....I HATE these sections. I understand that having good reading skills is necessary for law school and practicing law but lets be serious. Being able to "speed read" articles about ridiculous topics doesn't prove that you'll be better at making outlines or reading briefs (IMO)... Just that you can do them a little quicker... I think the questions in this section should be the same or less than those in LR/LG. Plus, i was better at those sections anyways! Ha.
 For the logic games, I would assume (yes, this is a flawed assumption but @#!* it, I'm not in LSAT mode right now) it had to be likely that any one with 23 questions was the real one. I know it doesn't really apply since things change randomly, but in all my latest preptests (55,56,57), the logic games were only 23 questions long. And the RC was usually 28. Seriously, wth. Why put the most questions on the part where you already have to read the most. Seems unnecessarily difficult. 20
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Sept. '09 LSAT DONE...FIRST POST!« on: September 27, 2009, 11:03:12 PM »
yes... i believe the test was 101 total...
RC- 27 LG- 23 LR- 25/26 |
