Law School Discussion

I've followed TLS and LSD. Both have been great source of information. I think as forums go, LSD has a little bit more information than TLS and maybe even a set of "experts." So I feel like there is consistent moderation and replies. However, I recently registered as a user to ask a question that wasn't being asked and very unique to me. After posting a new discussion, I realized I should have posted under an already existing TestPrep discussion. So I posted it there too. So a few hours later I get banned. Some of the 'senior citizens' thought i was employee of a test prep company. Just cause I asked "does anybody know anything about this company". Anyways, after the 48 hr ban I felt like LSD 'senior citizens' were applying their rules unfairly. They would let people write irrelevant put downs and just haggling but they'd ban me just cause they thought i worked for a company. I don't work for a company. I didn't want to squander my money on any testprep company, so I asked. Anyways. I think LSD and TLS both are important but TLS seems to be more open. Like the previous poster, they also have higher traffic. Both work for me. I think LSD can over come TLS in importance if moderations were done fairly and continuous back and forth between people could be better moderated. I mean, some discussions, I'm going down page after page before finding useful stuff. That's just my two cents. thanks for a great discussion board.

Hi Mitchell, Thanks for replying.

They only focus on LSATs. They work by email and send you personally tailored study material. They say they only use LSAC approved questions, so basically only PrepTest. They say they will go through 40 preptest for 170hrs with you. All the instructors have scored about 177. The part that makes sense to me is that they use all LSAC approved questions, however, saying all their instructors score above 177 seems so arbitrary. I mean. why not 172 like TM? I am just suspicious. Their website is.. snazzy. haha. what do you think?