Non ABA law students may have some effect on the cal bar pass rate but not enough to make a huge difference. California is acknowledged as a tough bar to pass.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jonlevy
« on: May 17, 2014, 08:56:23 PM »
There are some nationwide Social Security Advocacy firms that apparently do well enough to advertise a lot. They are regulated by SSA. California requires Immigration Consultants to post bond. Public Notaries such as they exists in some states also provide independent paralegal services. Given that lawyers have a lot more latitude to cheat clients and state bars are often indifferent regulators - as long as there is a need someone will provide the service. My point is that most DL law students will fail to pass the California bar but they can still work in the legal system and provide services while turning a profit equal or better than a solo practitioner if they are good enough.
No, only in Canada does the LLB require prior college; in the UK and elsewhere you go straight into the LLB from secondary school (high school). A much better way option IMO than the JD which forces you to shell out for 7 years of college! However to become a solicitor in England, you must usually complete a training contract which is also a good idea considering most new lawyers in the US learn on the job.
« on: May 17, 2014, 08:42:06 AM »
Patent Agent is a good one. With a JD, one can make some of these professions pay as well as a solo law practice. Social Security Advocates charge the same as attorneys and there are numerous lawyers who have made a good living just confining their work to Social Security. If I had a choice between a an advocate without a JD or a JD from a California registered online school, the latter might have an edge. A lot of California distance learning JDs will never pass the bar but that does not mean they are incompetent.
« on: May 16, 2014, 11:42:17 PM »
Add Immigration to the list though that can be state regulated as in California and the requirements for non lawyers can be tricky and may require both training and sponsorship.
« on: May 16, 2014, 11:40:43 PM »
Representing yourself does not count. McKenzie Friend is creating a problem in England:
There are also professional lay advocates in out of the way English jurisdictions where solicitors are scarce.
Given that many people cannot afford a lawyer in the US - even a lay advocate with some knowledge might be better than going pro per.
I agree Tax is specialized and the LLM to bar exam route questionable. There is a lot of interest in an International Law LLM but I suggest one that is focused on cross border practice as well as traditional IL. The EU now permits a lot of cross border practice so it is not uncommon to need to be familiar with comparative law. US lawyers are missing out on expanding their practices in transactional and corporate law, criminal defense, and as foreign legal experts.
If you ever do decide to offer an online International Law LLM - look me up - I have JD and PhD an am licensed in the US and three other countries. Also have been instructing IL and legal Studies at the Masters Level for a couple regionally accredited online programs since 2006 and have developed several courses over the years.
« on: April 14, 2014, 09:34:23 PM »
Since Concord unlike any other DL law School is actually a regionally accredited school same as any university through its affiliation with Kaplan, the EJD is similar to a MLS (Masters in Legal Studies). The 2 year MLS which Kaplan offers is actually a more versatile degree and is useful in government and for advancement as a paralegal. Neither one will qualify you to be a lawyer though. It is possible Concord filled its quota (though hard to believe) and had spaces in the EJD. More likely your writing and academic skills were not up to snuff according to Concord and thus they thought you a poor candidate to get past the FYLSE.