California should bar foreign lawyers whose jurisdictions who do not offer California lawyers the chance to sit for the bar.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - legalpractitioner
General Board / Re: Help! My Supervising Attorney Wants Me to Write My Own Letter of Recommendation!« on: November 10, 2014, 11:02:26 PM »
When I get asked by a former student, I ask them for their CV and try to write them a helpful letter referencing accomplishments and skills. Takes about ten minutes tops. Asking the recipient to draft their own letter displays a certain lack of collegiality as well as defeating the entire purpose of the letter. Heck it is just plain slack IMO.
General Board / Re: Help! My Supervising Attorney Wants Me to Write My Own Letter of Recommendation!« on: November 08, 2014, 09:49:26 PM »
Sure, some of my best briefs have been inspired by others but I draw the line at asking the recipient to draft their own letter of recommendation.
General Board / Re: Help! My Supervising Attorney Wants Me to Write My Own Letter of Recommendation!« on: November 07, 2014, 06:09:14 PM »
By the way, the supervising attorney seems both ethically and legally challenged if they can't crap out a couple paragraphs in your favor on their own. Guess the loser can;t even dictate into their IPad
General Board / Re: Help! My Supervising Attorney Wants Me to Write My Own Letter of Recommendation!« on: November 07, 2014, 06:06:15 PM »
Huh? They just opened the candy jar and you don't want any? Write a glowing review. As for the lazy supervising attorney shame on them. I can only imagine their briefs are all copy and paste jobs.
FreshlyMinted, I can't decide whether you truly don't understand what we wrote or you are a very good, subtle troll. I'm hoping for the latter for you personally, even though it wouldn't be great for the board.Trolling for what? What part do you think I have wrong. I have been spot on, sorry that I have a mind of my own. I stand by what I said.
Anyone who is something, and is something essentially, possesses "eo ipso," the claim to be recognized for exactly this special thing, and for nothing more or less. Søren Kierkegaard
What I mean is that an LL.M program does not teach the skills required to be a good lawyer. They assume that you learned those skills in your JD program. LL.M programs are more like a standard master's.
That LLM won't get anyone a bar ticket. A US LLM specifically geared to foreign attorneys might along with the right credentials. On the other hand if one were wanting to go into a human rights career, it's not a bad degree at all.
However, instead of going offshore for an online degree, the reasonable thing to do is enroll at Taft or Concord and take the First Year Law Exam. I have worked with at least two other Taft graduates who have been practicing in difficult areas of the law.
FreshlyMinted, I can't decide whether you truly don't understand what we wrote or you are a very good, subtle troll. I'm hoping for the latter for you personally, even though it wouldn't be great for the board.
Yes, that would be a real online LLM from England. It does not require a previous law degree. However, unlike their LLB, I don't see how it qualifies one to be a solicitor or attorney.
The courses deal with specialized areas of the law, not basic law.
However, it does look like a great alternative to say a regionally accredited Masters in Legal Studies from Kaplan University.
But unless bar admission committees are bone stupid, it won't get anyone a bar ticket.
Bad for the profession but especially bad for the student who may have been initially deceived by Novus. But I think as far as a Novus grad practicing law, that is a moot question because I really doubt there are any.
Novus has no faculty, no accreditation, and no lawyers apparently associated with it. Except based on misrepresentation, how can that be grounds for admission into an accredited LLM program? Diploma mill degrees are never valid, that is what Touro is seeking in the way of a finding by a court. Allowing a Novus grad to take a bar would be a complete undermining of the entire system. California online grads have to take the First Year Law Exam - Novus grads nothing. Additionally, Novus is not a foreign law school. They are simply an alleged offshore corporation not recognized as a school in their home jurisdiction RMI or anywhere else. Touro will get discovery and if Novus complies, more facts will come out.
Novus is almost certainly an IBC and therefore cannot legally do business or trade in their home jurisdiction, the RMI.
The few jurisdictions that offer lawyer supervised study have no need of Novus nor would any attorney want anything to do with them IMO.