This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jonlevy
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47  49 50 51 52 53 ... 55
« on: January 05, 2012, 09:30:32 AM »
Look at the stats 47% of lawyers in private practice in California are solo, down from 54% a few years back. I suspect another 25% in private practice are small firms, 2-5 lawyers. So unless you are going to work for the government, chances are you will be in the above categories. Why not hang out a shingle? You will be no less incompetent than most attorneys. As for your cohort in law school, they are typical scared of their own shadow type, don't want to mingle with indigents, would be lawyers who would faint dead away if they had to come face to face with a real client like a crank head, child molestor, SSI applicant, or angry divorced parent.
But you can be proactive:
All law schools offer some sort of practical experience - better sign up for it and attend courts in your spare time. You'll learn more about law hanging around the court house than from some pendantic so called law professor, who has the same JD you will you have. Also memorize Black's Law Dictionary, especially archaic Latin phrases and read everything by or about Gerry Spence, Louis Nizer, F. Lee Bailey and Melvin Belli. Also when you start practicing buy a largest ostentious fake gold plated Rolex, it instills confidence in clients no matter how inexperienced and pathetic you may look.
« on: January 05, 2012, 07:42:10 AM »
This is really a foolish line of discussion in a DL forum, if you have a DL degree you are not going to work for anyone unless it's your father in law. It's a given you are going to go solo like 47% of attorneys in California.http://www.calbarjournal.com/January2012/TopHeadlines.aspx
« on: January 04, 2012, 11:08:29 PM »
However, several states HAVE set the appropriate standard that matters – YOUR ABILITY TO APPLY THE LAW
There are a lot of lame attorney out there, 99% from ABA schools. Neither quality of schools nor passing the bar really guarantees much. Law naturally attracts a lot of sociopaths. It is sort of like the Catholic priesthood. The best way to weed these baddies out would be to make all lawyers take a two year apprenticeship after law school in which they had to do public service work. Passing the bar is only an indicator that someone can pass an exam.
This has been a problem however for Centuries:
When grappled in the law's embrace,
Who first betrayed an anxious face
And fain would shield me from disgrace
Who told me I should not confess,
That he would all wrong's redress
And set me free from all distress?
When, sick in jail, I senseless lay,
Who took my watch and case away
Lest prowling thieves on me should prey
Who to my wealth tenacious clung,
And for me wagged his oily tongue,
And at my foes hot embers flung
Who told me he was dreadful smart
And knew the law-books all by heart.
And always took his client's part?
Who, in the court, with peerless pride,
My rights affirmed, my guilt denied.
And swore the State's attorney lied?
And when twelve men, in one compound,
For me a guilty verdict found,
Who came to stanch the bleeding wound
Who said my time within the wall
Would be exceeding- brief and small,
The minimum, or none at all?
And when the judge my doom proclaimed,
And three long years of exile named,
Who looked indignant and ashamed?
When, at the sheriff's stern command,
I for the train was told to stand,
Who longest shook and squeezed my hand ?
Who, when he had me safe confined,
No more concerned his crafty mind,
Nor was, for me, to grief inclined?
Who closed the mortgage on my lot,
And drove my family from my cot,
And left them homeless on the spot ?
Who, when of prison clothes I 'm stripped,
And from these walls am homeward shipped,
Will get himself immensely whipped ?
[Written by Mr. George Gilbert, who died on the 9th of June
A. D. 1890.]
« on: January 03, 2012, 08:38:44 PM »
If you can't defend your position against your classmates, in a classroom, what hope do you have in a courtroom.
A real good one because you are not cut from the mold as ABA clone.
I was being appointed to felony cases as a PD within 6 months of passing the bar with my Taft JD. On my first criminal case, I skunked the DA with a motion to dismiss for lack of venue and won at the preliminary hearing. For my first five years of practice I was present at the county law and motion calender every week handling criminal cases, family law, civil litigation and juvenile cases. I didn't need any classmates in classroom, I learned from my colleagues who actually knew a thing or two about the law. My clients were all pleased because I took the time to listen to them, no matter their social or economic status. I took the cases no one else would touch. Last week I won the first round of a case at the African Commission in Banjul, The Gambia. I may not be rich but my cases are reported by the AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, etc.
So it can be done, don't listen to naysayers like Zepp. Zepp is the face of the type of law you are unlikely to practice as a DL graduate. If you beat the odds and pass the California Bar, give something back to society, don't squander your talents trying to be like the ABA law school grad.
« on: January 03, 2012, 10:10:49 AM »
Two types of LLMs in the US - one for foreigners trying to meet ABA requirements for comparative common law, the other variety are quickie 9-12 month programs purporting to specialize in tax law, IP, etc. Some of the DL variety may not be worth much except CLE credits.
Getting a UK LLB and then a US LLM might work in a few states, others would require an active solicitor's license. Many do not allow this at all. In any event, anyone who could survive all that could surely be admitted to a ABA approved school and save all sorts of time, effort and expense.
« on: December 31, 2011, 07:37:31 PM »
I think any 9-12 month degree could be questionnable. LLMs differ from country to country, some are two year programs like a true Masters degree. if they plan on practising in the EU, I'd steer clear of a US online degree and look at University of London instead:http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk/prospective_students/postgraduate/laws/index.shtml
They may want to post this question in the LLM forum.
« on: December 31, 2011, 10:42:30 AM »
Zepp, you are trying to compare apples and peanuts here. Obviously, students who attend a DL law school are aware they can only take the California Bar. DL schools regardless of curriculum are going to attact statistical outliars and a lot of failures who have no business being in law school. A DL school at present is basically a glorified reading list, it has nothing to do with what goes on a law school. However reading for law is a traditional and proven method of passing the bar. Since students already have a undergrad degree, so if they choose to read for the bar exam, what is the problem?
The English who have been practising law a lot longer than we have, have no problem with an external LLB.http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk/prospective_students/undergraduate/panel/law/about_qld.shtml
The answer here is for the ABA mossbacks to accept online education and let the well endowed ABA schools offer external JDs. This is the 21st Century, we have the technology available to replace the "sage on the stage with the guide on the side." But it takes money and aside from Washington Posts's Concord, no one has the money to make that sort of investment in a school that can only churn out California lawyers who then get blocked by ABA Luddites at every step.
« on: December 31, 2011, 10:22:36 AM »
Just find your community. Greatly appreciate, very informative. I am looking for a postgraduate online education for foreigners. My daughter has just compete her LLM and would like to specialize in IP and Internet property.
Not clear to me what the goal is? Are you going to practice in the EU or US? Many of the US online LLMs are questionnable as far as accredidation.
« on: December 30, 2011, 08:01:14 PM »
OK, I'll turn in my law licenses, your flawless logic has convinced me of my errors...
« on: December 28, 2011, 06:58:53 PM »
I have a PhD in Political Science and am a lawyer. I practice law and am adjunct faculty. My advice is go for the tenure track job, history jobs are even scarcer than law jobs. If you don't get tenure then switch to law. While starting university salaries are low they go up after a while, you get good benefits, a pension plan, and once you get tenure chances at free travel to conferences, sabbaticals, and a reduced teaching schedule. It also is less work than law and more enjoyable. Besides why would you want to rack up more debt or take yourself out of the job market when you could be arning money?
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47  49 50 51 52 53 ... 55