« on: July 17, 2012, 01:27:11 PM »
And the DC bar motion in is only by a quirk of law when the mandatory bar was set up in 1970, if it was up to the local DC bar I am sure they too would exclude online grads.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - legalpractitioner
« on: July 17, 2012, 09:31:35 AM »
Like I stated before, I'm coming out of law enforcement so if I was to practice law, I would prefer to work for the District Attorney's Office. After all, I would rather contribute by keeping criminals in jail rather than trying to keep those individuals out. The Cal-Bar school near my house is not correspondence, and a large number of their graduates are hired by the D.A.'s office. They also have a courthouse on site that is run by the Superior Court of California, so there is a lot of networking between the students of this school and the D.A.'s Office. If I couldn't get a position with the D.A.'s Office, I would open my own practice as I would not like to work for a law firm. Hence my situation, and the reason why I treading lightly and trying to weigh my opinions . . .
If you want to work for a DAs office in California, I strongly urge you to go to the best possible school you can get into. They will not hire an online grad unless you had many years of experience in criminal law as an attorney. Those are considered good jobs with full county benefits and a CALPERS pension.
A JD or a foreign equivalament like a LLB is usually the preliminary requirement for a LLM. In any event, the LLM by itself does not qualify one to practice law.
A CPA-Lawyer is not necessarily going to earn more than a non CPA Lawyer. I would make a decision based solely on enhanced earnings (if any) over a CPA and the loss of time, earnings, and costs involved in getting the JD. Finally, given the IRS crackdown on tax planners, I am not sure the old dodge of hiring a CPA-Lawyer to do tax planning and thus get attorney client privilege will be viable any longer?
« on: July 16, 2012, 10:06:11 PM »
Ever attended a California Community College? Trust me, it is not Harvard and the grads are not going to be successful in law school, online or otherwise. Someone who can't complete a BA is not going to usually have the self discipline to complete a 4 year distance learning program. Although I've met a few prison inmates who could do it but for the moral requirements.
« on: July 16, 2012, 10:02:01 PM »
It is a huge difference, but not entirely correct. There are a few states which will allow distance learning graduates to take the state bar, though they may have practice requirements before allowing them to do so. This has been discussed ad nauseam on here - do a search.
5 years practice and motion in to the DC bar but no one seems to understand that here. Iowa has a similar motion in with a few twists. Even if it is theoretically possible to take a bar in a few other states, they will make it difficult for you to qualify. Online grads are not welcome except in California and DC.
« on: July 15, 2012, 08:12:11 PM »
Things have changed since then. Did they have the Blackboard when you were going, calgal? Their videos are nothing to rave about. I didn't bother with them. Same with the CDs. But their online chats & video chats are terrific. Jeff Fleming now works for NWCU too & he comes to some of the video chats. Lots of fun There is both a text and video chat for each level. When BabyBar is coming up they put on special chats for the takers to participate in.
Fleming is or was the system that successful online students use to study for the bar sice at least the late 1980s.
« on: July 15, 2012, 08:06:32 PM »
BTW, there is a lot of talk about if someone goes to an online school they won't be able to get a job. Many threads by grads of traditional schools focus on getting a job. Can get, hope to get, can't get. A job.
Not so sure that PDs without experience and an online degree will be hired. PD is an in demand job if it has benefits.
« on: July 15, 2012, 10:28:38 AM »
... You can also take the English QLTS after two years because England has a reciprocity agreement with California, same with the Ireland QLTT. You will not be welcomed in any other state besides California and DC.
Go to law school first, pass the Cal bar, then have 2 years PQE, sign up, pay the fees, pass the exams:
« on: July 14, 2012, 10:22:19 AM »
You know what I found interesting. There is an attorney in my area that is very well known and he has a great reputation. He graduated from a tier one law school and he has been practicing law for a very long time. I was cruising around his website and noticed his son just joined his law firm. I was curious so I looked him up and it seems his son graduated from a non ABA school accredited by Cal-Bar. Being that the kid came from a family of attorney's will alot of money, but yet he didn't go the ABA . . . . . . very interesting.
If you are going to work for your Dad, as long as junior has a law license, his degree is irrelevant. But no one chooses non ABA, if they have money and ability. And choosing online is for those who either geographically can't attend a law school, can't get into one, or otherwise have issues with sitting in classes due to time contraints or disability. The only exception might be something like the external program at London University but in the US we do not have ABA law schools that also have online programs.