Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Cloud'nBolt

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
11
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 16, 2009, 09:35:31 PM »
I wish I did have proof, or at least quoted you on it at the time, like most people do.

Seriously, its like pulling teeth from a freakin chicken! Out of all these “sever problems” that you reference to, all you got is that Cal Western is LOOSING its status in the legal market.I strongly question that. Cal Western has a good name for itself in the SD community. it’s not the best if someone wanted to practice big law in another big city, but its well respected here at home.

12
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 16, 2009, 06:47:16 PM »
In the beginning, TJ Troll did contribute to the conversation by saying both schools have a large attrition rate.I latter gave him credit for that in another post. I initially challenged him on that because he combined the “Academic Attrition” with the “Other Attrition”.  His exaggerations were that they were both one in the same, and ignored the POSSIBILITY that there could have been other reasons for not making it through besides academics. Ultimately, it’s a grey area, and nothing can be said for certain, however it does warrant caution and consideration. His exaggerations and distortions of fact in other comments he made lead to holes in his argument, and without factual information to back up what he was saying, he high-tailed it out of the thread, taking his posts with him. That’s when YOU came in the picture, without skipping a beat, picking up where he left off. And to be honest, I think YOU are TJ Troll. I believe you deleted all of your post under TJ Troll because you knew that your argument contained too many holes to defend, so you cut your losses, and came back as “Reality”, essentially agreeing with yourself (TJTROLL) and picked up where you left off without the need to address my argument against you.  The poster that claimed to know 2 transfer Cal Western students and have 2 TJSL buddies was TJ Troll initially. But maybe that is just a coincidence right? Or maybe you forgot which alias you said it under?
You claim that your transferring pals would “readily admit there are sever problems at both programs that the administration has glossed over”??? All these opportunities you have had to present those problems (more than one), yet all you have contributed was high attrition rates. I question the truthfulness of your “first hand experience“, I would be pleasantly surprised if you proved me wrong and provided some of their opinions. However given your track record on providing information, Im not expecting much out of you…


13
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 16, 2009, 03:26:47 AM »
I stand behind everything that I have ever written. I have been here on this thread since the beginning, and have seen ignorant superiority complex fools like you, come and go. I deleted only the long irrelevant posts detailing HOW people like you are clowns. I figure that a reasonably intelligent person, would see the ignorance of the statements people like you make. And yes, I do believe a statement like “Nothing good ever comes out of X law school” is a very ignorant statement, especially when you have no experience in those specific law schools you chose to criticizes. You think Im “hurt” by what you say?! Hahaha  :D, I don’t think now is the time for jokes. To be honest, im actually more “concerned” that there are ignorant people such as yourself in the legal profession. And to think, I use to wonder why lawyers had such a bad reputation in society. Too bad they don’t test ignorance on the LSAT, or at least weed it out somewhere in law school.

14
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 15, 2009, 11:35:56 AM »
I said you havent contributed anything in your last 6 posts, not that you have never contributed anything at all. see below. ;)
Ninja1, PLEASE tell me how you have added anything constructive to the conversation of "Cal Western or Thomas Jefferson" in your last 6 POSTS on this thread.

TJ Troll, before he deleted his posts, contributed by saying
(1) Attrition rates are ridiculously high for both schools
(2) Admissions reps sometimes fudge information about the “Other” column of attrition rates and LASC is probably going to start cracking down in the future

My hat goes off to him for contributing to the conversation. If you could add any points (good or bad) about either schools, id love to hear them. 



Hahaha whos the new guy?! Welcome T Durden to the thread labeled “Cal Western or Thomas J…”. I see you, like many others before, have nothing constructive to add. Im sure you’ll find yourself right at home…
When I try to find a logical reason why a Tier1 or Tier2 student would be on a TIER4 discussion thread with nothing constructive to ADD, I begin to wonder about the character of these individuals. Maybe you had issues growing up, or maybe you weren’t hugged enough as a child, I don’t know. But im finding it much easy to laugh, smile and wink at you CrackerJacks than to attempt to have a real conversation. Sometimes you just cant reason with the people with issues.  :)

;)

Thank you Mathies. I, as well as im sure a lot of contemplative individuals, truly appreciate the insight


Most folks also appreciate passable spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Hey I got disablity stop repressing me!  >:(

The previous was for Cloud'nBolt, you do fine. Most of your s/g/p mistakes look like mine when I've just been drinking too much, which is totally forgivable.

how likely is it that 'ole Cloud'nBolt here would fail a hypothetical LSAT section testing the examinee's ability to choose the context-appropriate emoticon? 96%? 97%?

this thread is unbelievable.

Cloud'nBolt getting more "props" every day.  You hate to make over generalizations about people who vigorously promote and defend these schools, but why do these always end up clueless fools?  :'(

We do add something, it's just not what you want to hear.

15
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 15, 2009, 03:47:46 AM »
Seriously Reality, your like a JackN the Box, I never know when I will see your clown ass posts poppin up, For a while there, I genuinely thought you got smart, and realized that you have nothing to contribute IN COMPARING THESE TWO SCHOOLS.  At least Ninja1 gave some contribution in the beginning. Even now, while im putting your lack of your on topic contribution on blast, you will probably reply with…NOTHING NEW TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONVERSATION!  We are comparing the pros and cons of  two schools.  Not these two schools with the nation, or the world, just these two schools against each other. Something is seriously wrong with you for missing that, all I know is that you are the biggest CrackerJack of them all!

16
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 15, 2009, 12:28:38 AM »
Ninja1, im beginning to think that you are just a stubborn fool that doesn’t know when to quit or walk away.  You have turned a thread with a designed purpose in mind, into a thread where everyone is reveling your ignorance. Although exposing the CrackerJack you truly are is meagerly entertaining, im begining to feel a little bad for you.  Mostly because I believe your credibility has packed its bags and left (catching the next train to Dignified Respectability). Not that its relevant or even mature for that matter, but I agree, you are mostly composed of “poo”… ;D

17
Thomas Jefferson / Re: TJSL Entering Student 2009
« on: April 14, 2009, 02:42:36 PM »
Hi.  Today I visited the school and was quite unimpressed.  I know the building is small, parking was really crazy and the school is located near industrial buildings.  I understand that the school is moving to downtown San Diego in 2011 so that's a good thing.  Anyone else have any information on the school?

I agree that the looks of the place are not very impressive, the school was never designed to be a school at all. They were initially only office spaces back in the day, redesigned a little to be classrooms. However, what makes Thomas Jefferson really Thomas Jefferson is the faculty and students. Did you go on a tour and sit in a class? I would imagine that some people just don’t get the same vibe from the place like others do, and that’s completely understandable. “Different strokes, for different folks” as they say  8). They are moving downtown in the Spring semester of the 2010-2011 academic year, so that is something exciting to look forward to. I believe it will drastically change the schools image in San Diego in the preceding years following its completion…but only time will tell.

18
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 11, 2009, 06:34:33 PM »
I don’t consider critiquing grammar on a post, a contribution to the topic of “Cal Western or Thomas” ...sorry.
But if you wanted to add any points about either law school good or bad, id love to hear them.


It's kind of irrelevant if you think I've contributed anything to the discussion, or what you'd love to hear ("Cal Western is great!" seems to be what you're gunning for), actually.

Enjoy poo law.

If wanting to hear good or bad points comparing these law schools is NOT relevant, what WOULD be relevant?

19
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 11, 2009, 06:13:53 PM »
I don’t consider critiquing grammar on a post, a contribution to the topic of “Cal Western or Thomas” ...sorry.
But if you wanted to add any points about either law school good or bad, id love to hear them.

20
California Western / Re: Cal Western or Thomas J…
« on: April 10, 2009, 11:45:16 PM »
Ninja1, PLEASE tell me how you have added anything constructive to the conversation of "Cal Western or Thomas Jefferson" in your last 6 POSTS on this thread.

TJ Troll, before he deleted his posts, contributed by saying
(1) Attrition rates are ridiculously high for both schools
(2) Admissions reps sometimes fudge information about the “Other” column of attrition rates and LASC is probably going to start cracking down in the future

My hat goes off to him for contributing to the conversation. If you could add any points (good or bad) about either schools, id love to hear them. 



Hahaha whos the new guy?! Welcome T Durden to the thread labeled “Cal Western or Thomas J…”. I see you, like many others before, have nothing constructive to add. Im sure you’ll find yourself right at home…
When I try to find a logical reason why a Tier1 or Tier2 student would be on a TIER4 discussion thread with nothing constructive to ADD, I begin to wonder about the character of these individuals. Maybe you had issues growing up, or maybe you weren’t hugged enough as a child, I don’t know. But im finding it much easy to laugh, smile and wink at you CrackerJacks than to attempt to have a real conversation. Sometimes you just cant reason with the people with issues.  :)

;)

Thank you Mathies. I, as well as im sure a lot of contemplative individuals, truly appreciate the insight


Most folks also appreciate passable spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Hey I got disablity stop repressing me!  >:(

The previous was for Cloud'nBolt, you do fine. Most of your s/g/p mistakes look like mine when I've just been drinking too much, which is totally forgivable.

how likely is it that 'ole Cloud'nBolt here would fail a hypothetical LSAT section testing the examinee's ability to choose the context-appropriate emoticon? 96%? 97%?

this thread is unbelievable.

Cloud'nBolt getting more "props" every day.  You hate to make over generalizations about people who vigorously promote and defend these schools, but why do these always end up clueless fools?  :'(

We do add something, it's just not what you want to hear.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4