Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - kmpnj

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 57
Current Law Students / Re: Word Limits
« on: April 07, 2007, 12:17:58 AM »
Word limits, unfortunately, are a necessary evil.  I'm doing the revisions on my brief now and, probably like most super-egotistical law students, have fallen in love with what I've written.  But its good because it really forces you to choose the very best language of your argument and ditch the rest.  It forces you to edit yourself even though, of course, what you've written is perfect.

Fortunately for my class, my prof. said she'd much rather have us go 50 words over and make our argument clear than conform to the word limit and lose points for not making sense.

Online Law Schools / Re: William Howard Taft University
« on: February 07, 2007, 11:43:41 AM »
If you already work for the DOJ and you're in DC, why not just go to UDC?  Its probably cheaper, its accredited and they cater to working professionals.  Its a Tier 4, but at least its on a Tier.  I just think that its too risky to gamble all of that money on a school that's unaccredited.

Job Search / Re: Interview question
« on: February 03, 2007, 11:01:22 AM »
My biggest weakness is looking down on shitheads that ask me what my biggest weakness is...

Seriously, I got that question yesterday and I pulled "Sometimes, I expect people to care about the job as much as I do and I don't make allowances for the fact that they might have other things going on in their lives" out of my ass.

The lady smiled when I said that, so I think she liked that answer, but who the hell knows

Job Search / Re: Would PA firms be interested?
« on: February 03, 2007, 10:55:08 AM »
I'm in a similar situation.  I am 33 and in my 1L year as a career change after being a corrections officer.  My grades, overall, were ok (some great, some average), but I have had a few interviews in the Philly/NJ/Del area and have a few more set up in the next few weeks. 

Based solely on my experience over the past few weeks, I have found that every interviewer (except one, who had no interest in anything I had to say) wanted to talk about working in a jail and how I was able to go to undergrad full-time, make dean's list throughout and still work 50 hours per week in a jail.

Bottom line is should be fine either way you go.  You're background makes you interesting and, at the end of the day, most summer employers will want to talk to someone with a background that is a bit different than the usual 23-25 year old who went to law school straight from undergrad with no life experience.  As long as your grades are not in the toilet, no one will care.  I've had a total of 7 interviews and was asked about my grades ONCE.  Again, this is just my experience and, to be fair, all of these interviews were with government agencies and public interest organizations, but still only one out of seven asked me about my grades.  For you, as long as you get the interview, you'll probably be fine.

Now, how to get the interview.  I can only tell you what's been working for me.  I have been on the phone since finals ended last fall, calling different firms/gov't offices/public interest groups, and asking if I can send a resume.  What has happened is that they ask me a bit about myself (Name, where I go to school).  Then they ask me to send a resume or they tell me that they've hired enough summer interns this year.  If they say "send me a resume" then you're sending your resume to someone who is looking for YOUR resume.  I think that makes it a little bit less likely that your resume will end up in the circular file.  Also, utilize your career services office.  When I got to my school, all the 2Ls and 3Ls bitched about how bad career services was.  I have been riding their ass like the Lone Ranger and I have to say that they've been very helpful.  Basically, take advantage of all of your school's resources and you should be fine.

Good Luck

Current Law Students / Am I Screwed?
« on: January 22, 2007, 01:53:36 PM »
Just got grades today.  I got a B+ in Civ Pro, B in Property, C+ in Methods and a C in Torts.  I go to a T4 and my cumulative GPA is a 2.673 on a 2.5 curve.  Am I completely screwed or can I turn this around in the Spring? Any thoughts would, as always, be appreciated.

Current Law Students / Re: Law School Prep Courses.....lame or essential?
« on: January 18, 2007, 02:20:22 PM »
I took one right before school started in August.  I found it helpful mainly because it served as a warm-up to the real thing.  As far as imparting any great wisdom, some tips they gave I still use, some I don't.  I think the bottom line is finding what formula of study works for you, which will take time.  I will say that, if the program uses socratic method, then its useful, if you've never had it before because it takes away some of the shock value. 

Current Law Students / Re: True Horror Story
« on: January 06, 2007, 12:47:31 AM »
This is why I'm a HUGE believer in the pre-emptive strike.  I usually volunteer for about 10 minutes or so, then I'm done for the class, unless something being said is particularly interesting.

Current Law Students / Scored 1st interview...Any suggestions
« on: January 05, 2007, 08:24:25 PM »
So, I scored my 1st summer job interview with a small, med-malpractice firm for next week and was wondering if I could poach any words of wisdom from any of you who have been through the process.  What are some good questions for me to ask as opposed to what questions are not good to ask.  Basically, I want to avoid making a complete jackass out of myself, so any helpful hints would be appreciated.  Thanks.

Current Law Students / Still waiting for grades
« on: January 05, 2007, 08:21:54 PM »
I swear to God, waiting for law school grades sucks worse than waiting for LSAT scores or waiting to see if you've been accepted to law school.  Anyone else still waiting for their grades?

Current Law Students / Re: false imprisonment?
« on: December 20, 2006, 12:32:09 PM »
However, if Mike is blocking John's path to the door, then why would John have to attempt to find a reasonable way to escape.  There is no other way out, therefore, for John to escape, he has to go through Mike, if Mike is blocking the door.  If not, then yes John would probably have to at least try the door.  However, there are other factors that we do not know.  What is the size differential between Mike and John.  Clearly, if Mike looks like Ving Rames and John looks like Gary Coleman, then John could make an argument that he was in reasonable fear of physical retribution if he tried to escape, especially if there were some sort of heated confrontation which preceded being locked in the room.  Also, if its shopkeeper's privilege, then there is no good faith exception.  If the alleged shoplifter did not actually shoplift, then the shopkeeper is on the hook for FI.  Therefore I'd like to amend my original answer to a resounding maybe.  If this were an essay, I think it would probably be useful to argue both points as the facts that are given are not clear.  I would probably do the whole "It could be a false imprisonment cause of action because...; on the other hand, it might not be because..."

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 57