Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jontor

Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64]
631
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« on: December 03, 2005, 03:21:47 PM »
What abou the question about the drug taken by physicians to lower cholesterol or something like that.  I put something like no pre-existing heart conditions. 

that's what i went with too

I went with that too

632
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 03, 2005, 03:17:35 PM »
Is the rock concert Exeprimenta/.

633
Studying for the LSAT / Re: someone IM to discuss DEC LSAT
« on: December 03, 2005, 02:55:00 PM »
Mine is Tuskyjay (aim)

634
Studying for the LSAT / POST MORTEM Anyone got two Logic Games Sections?
« on: December 03, 2005, 02:53:33 PM »
I got two logic games section and the second one started with with a company uses 0,1,2,3,4 to identify thier product label or something like that....I have no clue what the game was talking about ..I'm hoping is the experimental sectionanybody gpt this one two

635
Studying for the LSAT / Re: very difficult LG..
« on: November 25, 2005, 07:54:08 PM »
take a look at prep test 44 LG 13-17

"The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does either the site
visited first or that visited fourth."

==It should be translated to " 1 > both 3 and 4."

otherwise, you would be bombed in cracking this game.
Kralf:
In LSAT "if it doesn't can't" and "it doesn't must" then it "could"  don't bring in too much common sense into LSAT ...goodluck

636
Studying for the LSAT / Re: very difficult LG..
« on: November 25, 2005, 07:31:50 PM »
strictly speaking, under no circumstance should this sentence be interpreted as "A is more than Both B and C".
It means "A>B, or A>C, or A>BUC." Your interpretation is only one out of three possible suffient conditions, and is much narrower than it logically is.

A>BUC translates into A > B + C but that is not what it says A can be greater than B or greater than C or greater than both B and C but it never says that A is greater than B and C added together which is what the B union C there will be saying

637
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Roll Call. Dec test takers
« on: November 24, 2005, 08:57:32 AM »
First Timer, taking december '05 at New Bedford Massachusetts

638
Studying for the LSAT / Re: What's your study schedule like ? Here's mine
« on: November 21, 2005, 12:16:44 PM »
I plan on taking an additional 10- 12 more before the exam dont kow if this will backfire any tots on that?

639
Studying for the LSAT / Re: October 2000 Prep. # 32 Logical Reasoning
« on: November 21, 2005, 11:07:16 AM »
answers a and c are "TOO STRONG"

640
Studying for the LSAT / Re: What's your study schedule like ? Here's mine
« on: November 21, 2005, 08:39:53 AM »
Monreith:
How many preptest in total will you be taking prior to the exam? just curious?

Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64]