Discussion
Resources
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
61
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 19, 2009, 01:18:47 AM »
Earlcat,
Yeah I understand the ones I got correct. I have a batch of incorrect Q's I look over weekly. any other advice? 62
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 16, 2009, 05:22:09 PM »
92 raw score!!!!! october 1994! 170 - talk about a crazy difficult scale...
63
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 15, 2009, 04:58:06 PM »
June 1994 - F(*&ing 164 sigh. and no i didn't take this PT telling me i HAD to do well.
64
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 13, 2009, 05:33:52 PM »
last two PTs have been quite disappointing. PT #9 and 10.
169 on #9 160 (wtf) on #10 - was the RC in this PT particularly hard? 66
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 10, 2009, 02:43:14 PM »
Well, today I'm just reviewing the incorrect LRs from this past week and "memorizing" them. Tomorrow I'm going to take another PT. Hopefully I'll break 170+.
I'm still scared of the Sept 09 LSAT. 67
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How indicative?« on: July 10, 2009, 02:18:58 PM »
160, i redid the incorrect questions on that test and got them all correct except 1 (not counting RC)
68
Studying for the LSAT / How indicative?« on: July 10, 2009, 01:53:46 PM »
Hey all,
My June 09 score was horrible so I started studying for the re-take (Sept 09) since July 1st. I've gone through all the PT's once (all 58-i think). I looked through the LRB and made brief notes. Also I decided to re-take all the PTs out there again and try to score above 170+ with all the logical process down for LR. I took about 8 PTs timed 32 minutes per section with no experimental section and the scores were all higher than my June 09 exam. The range has been 166-170. I got 170 twice so far. Funny thing is I don't really "remember" the questions from the PTs when I'm taking them. I go through the logical process for every LR question when I'm taking the PT. Also same for LG and RC. I still got about 50 PTs to go and more incorrect LR questions and logic patterns to memorize and study but I was just wondering - if you did take the LSAT second time and improved - are these scores even slightly representative of what I might score on the Sept 09 exam. Or is it too early to tell? 69
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Advice« on: July 06, 2009, 12:26:56 AM »
Look for patterns, and focus on the question types you got wrong. Also review the questions you got right - exactly know why you got them right. Be thorough and detailed.
Time yourself on almost everything. 1:20 for each question for LR; 8:30 for a game and RC passage. 70
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT preptests« on: July 06, 2009, 12:24:23 AM »
refer to earlcat's ultimate thread.
|
